File Storage · head to head
Ceph vs Jaeger
Ceph
File Storage
Open source distributed storage providing object, block and file from one cluster
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ceph ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.; Jaeger tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- They diverge on capability: Ceph covers RADOS object store, Jaeger covers Distributed trace search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ceph and Jaeger actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ceph
- RADOS object store
- RADOS Gateway
- RBD block devices
- CephFS
- CRUSH placement
- Erasure coded pools
Only in Jaeger
- Distributed trace search
- Dependency graph
- Adaptive sampling
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ceph
- Backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an S3 endpoint all need the same hardwarenot Jaeger
- Growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity serversnot Jaeger
- Research and media environments with petabytes of data and staff who can operate storagenot Jaeger
- Providing an S3 endpoint on premises with multi site replication under your own controlnot Jaeger
Jaeger
- Finding which service in a request path causes the latencynot Ceph
- Understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wikinot Ceph
- Debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patternsnot Ceph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ceph
- Ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.
- Small clusters are inefficient: three way replication means a third of raw capacity is usable, and erasure coding needs enough failure domains to be safe, so the economics only work above a certain size.
- Recovery and rebalancing generate heavy internal traffic, so a failed disk can degrade client latency across the cluster unless backfill is throttled correctly beforehand.
- Upgrades must follow a strict daemon order across monitors, managers, OSDs and gateways, and a mistake in that order on a live cluster is difficult to reverse.
- Because it is self hosted, every byte served to the internet is transit you pay for on your own links, so the free licence does not mean free egress and bandwidth planning becomes your problem rather than the providers.
Jaeger
- Tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- Storage is the real operational cost: high-volume tracing on Elasticsearch or Cassandra is a cluster to run and pay for
- Traces alone, without correlated metrics and logs, leave you switching between tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
Ceph
Free- CephFree
- Full functionality, no capacity limit
- Object, block and file interfaces
- Community support via mailing list and Slack
Jaeger
Free- JaegerFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Ceph if
- You need rados object store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want rados gateway.
Choose Jaeger if
- You need distributed trace search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want dependency graph.
Questions people ask
- Is Ceph or Jaeger better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ceph starts at Free and Jaeger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ceph or Jaeger?
- Ceph starts at Free and Jaeger at Free.
- Does Ceph or Jaeger run on more platforms?
- Ceph runs on Linux. Jaeger runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- Can I use Ceph for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ceph best used for?
- Ceph is most often used for backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an s3 endpoint all need the same hardware, growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity servers, research and media environments with petabytes of data and staff who can operate storage, providing an s3 endpoint on premises with multi site replication under your own control. Of those, backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an s3 endpoint all need the same hardware and growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity servers are not what Jaeger is typically brought in for.
- What can Ceph do that Jaeger cannot?
- Ceph covers RADOS object store, RADOS Gateway, RBD block devices, CephFS. Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Dependency graph, Adaptive sampling, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ceph: How many nodes do I need to start?
Three is the practical minimum for a replicated cluster with real fault tolerance, and most production advice starts at five once you account for maintenance windows.
Jaeger: Is Jaeger free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Costs are the storage backend you run.
Ceph: Is it faster than a SAN?
Not on single stream latency. It wins on aggregate throughput and on growing without a forklift upgrade, which is a different property from raw speed.
Jaeger: Do I use Jaeger or OpenTelemetry?
Both, usually. Instrument with OpenTelemetry and use Jaeger to store and query the traces.
Ceph: Can I buy support?
Yes. IBM sells IBM Storage Ceph and SUSE and others have offered supported builds; the upstream project itself is free.
Jaeger: Does Jaeger handle metrics and logs?
No. It is a tracing system. Metrics and logs need Prometheus, Loki or an equivalent.
Ceph: Should I use it just for S3?
If object is all you need, a dedicated object store is simpler to run. Ceph earns its complexity when you need block and file as well.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ceph vs MinIO
- Ceph vs Panzura
- Ceph vs Scality RING
- Ceph vs VAST Data
- Ceph vs Backblaze
- Ceph vs Duplicati
- Ceph vs Storj
- Ceph vs Tigris
- Ceph vs Cloudflare R2
- Ceph vs Cloudian
- Ceph vs IDrive e2
- Ceph vs TrueNAS
- Ceph vs LucidLink
- Ceph vs pCloud
- Ceph vs Sync.com
- Ceph vs Zipkin
- Ceph vs Grafana Cloud
- Ceph vs VictoriaMetrics
- Ceph vs Fastly
- Ceph vs HAProxy
- Ceph vs Anyscale
- Ceph vs Proxmox VE
- Ceph vs Rancher
- Ceph vs OpenEBS
- Ceph vs DeepInfra
- Ceph vs Go
- Ceph vs Packer
- Ceph vs Caddy
- Ceph vs Cerebrium
- Ceph vs K3s
- Jaeger vs MinIO
- Jaeger vs Panzura
- Jaeger vs Scality RING
- Jaeger vs VAST Data
- Jaeger vs Backblaze
- Jaeger vs Duplicati
- Jaeger vs Storj
- Jaeger vs Tigris
- Jaeger vs Cloudflare R2
- Jaeger vs Cloudian
- Jaeger vs IDrive e2
- Jaeger vs TrueNAS
- Jaeger vs LucidLink
- Jaeger vs pCloud
- Jaeger vs Sync.com
- Jaeger vs Zipkin
- Jaeger vs Grafana Cloud
- Jaeger vs VictoriaMetrics
- Jaeger vs Fastly
- Jaeger vs HAProxy
- Jaeger vs Anyscale
- Jaeger vs Proxmox VE
- Jaeger vs Rancher
- Jaeger vs OpenEBS
- Jaeger vs DeepInfra
- Jaeger vs Go
- Jaeger vs Packer
- Jaeger vs Caddy
- Jaeger vs Cerebrium
- Jaeger vs K3s