Research · head to head
Schrodinger vs SurveyMonkey

Schrodinger
Research
Physics based molecular modelling and drug discovery software, licensed by token pool
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only SurveyMonkey has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Schrodinger licences are sold as token pools rather than unlimited module access, so a department can be blocked mid campaign because colleagues are consuming concurrency, and expanding the pool is a new commercial negotiation rather than a setting.; SurveyMonkey team plans require minimum 3 users as baseline
- They diverge on capability: Schrodinger covers Maestro, SurveyMonkey covers Survey builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Schrodinger and SurveyMonkey actually diverge.
| Attribute | Schrodinger | SurveyMonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web | Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 1999 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Schrodinger
- Maestro
- Glide
- FEP+
- Desmond
- Jaguar
- LiveDesign
- Materials Science suite
Only in SurveyMonkey
- Survey builder
- Question bank
- Survey logic
- Multi-language surveys
- Mobile surveys
- Real-time results
- Data analysis tools
- Custom branding
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Schrodinger
- A medicinal chemistry programme using FEP+ to prioritise which analogues to synthesise, where avoiding a handful of wasted syntheses pays for the licencenot SurveyMonkey
- A structure based design campaign that needs docking at scale against a target with a good crystal structurenot SurveyMonkey
- A materials group modelling polymer or electrolyte properties before committing to formulation experimentsnot SurveyMonkey
- A university modelling group that qualifies for the published academic site licence and needs Maestro across a teaching and research cohortnot SurveyMonkey
SurveyMonkey
- Market research and customer surveysnot Schrodinger
- Employee feedback and engagement trackingnot Schrodinger
- Data collection and analysisnot Schrodinger
- Customer satisfaction and NPS measurementsnot Schrodinger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Schrodinger
- Licences are sold as token pools rather than unlimited module access, so a department can be blocked mid campaign because colleagues are consuming concurrency, and expanding the pool is a new commercial negotiation rather than a setting.
- Commercial pricing is not published and is negotiated against modules, cores and term, so two companies of similar size can pay very different amounts and neither can benchmark the other.
- FEP+ needs substantial GPU capacity that is not included in the licence, so the real annual cost includes cloud or on premise hardware that often rivals the software line item.
- The tools require trained computational chemists to produce trustworthy results, and an organisation without that function will generate predictions it cannot interpret or defend to its own medicinal chemists.
- Schrodinger runs its own internal drug discovery pipeline alongside selling software to discovery companies, and some prospective customers treat that dual role as a conflict when discussing proprietary targets, which slows procurement even where contractual separation exists.
SurveyMonkey
- Team plans require minimum 3 users as baseline
- Annual response limits enforced: 50,000 responses/year on Team Advantage, 100,000 on Team Premier
- Additional responses beyond annual limits charged at AED 0.50 per response
- Enterprise plan requires custom pricing and minimum 5 users
- Advanced features like multilingual surveys and phone support require Team Premier tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Schrodinger
On request- Commercial licence$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer against modules, cores and licence term
- Applications draw from a shared token pool that caps concurrency
- GPU compute for FEP+ and Desmond is a separate cost, on premise or cloud
- Academic site licence$undefined/year
- Published academic entry around 7,500 USD a year for a premium package with a token allocation
- Restricted to academic and research use, not work supporting a commercial enterprise
- Maestro generally unrestricted with tokens shared for compute heavy applications
SurveyMonkey
Free- Team Advantage$99/month
- 50,000 responses per year
- Unlimited surveys and questions
- 3 user minimum
- Team Premier$240/month
- 100,000 responses per year
- All Team Advantage features
- White label branding
Which should you pick?
Choose Schrodinger if
- You need maestro.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want glide.
Choose SurveyMonkey if
- You need survey builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want question bank.
Questions people ask
- Is Schrodinger or SurveyMonkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. Schrodinger starts at On request and SurveyMonkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Schrodinger or SurveyMonkey?
- SurveyMonkey has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Schrodinger and Free for SurveyMonkey.
- Does Schrodinger or SurveyMonkey run on more platforms?
- Schrodinger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web. SurveyMonkey runs on Web.
- Can I use SurveyMonkey for free?
- Yes. SurveyMonkey has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Schrodinger starts at On request.
- What is Schrodinger best used for?
- Schrodinger is most often used for a medicinal chemistry programme using fep+ to prioritise which analogues to synthesise, where avoiding a handful of wasted syntheses pays for the licence, a structure based design campaign that needs docking at scale against a target with a good crystal structure, a materials group modelling polymer or electrolyte properties before committing to formulation experiments, a university modelling group that qualifies for the published academic site licence and needs maestro across a teaching and research cohort. Of those, a medicinal chemistry programme using fep+ to prioritise which analogues to synthesise, where avoiding a handful of wasted syntheses pays for the licence and a structure based design campaign that needs docking at scale against a target with a good crystal structure are not what SurveyMonkey is typically brought in for.
- What can Schrodinger do that SurveyMonkey cannot?
- Schrodinger covers Maestro, Glide, FEP+, Desmond. SurveyMonkey covers Survey builder, Question bank, Survey logic, Multi-language surveys.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Schrodinger: How is Schrodinger software licensed?
Annual licences with a shared token pool. Tokens cap how much you can run at once rather than which modules you own outright.
SurveyMonkey: How much does SurveyMonkey cost?
SurveyMonkey offers team plans starting at AED 99 per user per month for Team Advantage and AED 240 per user per month for Team Premier. Both plans require a minimum of 3 users. Billing can be monthly or annual.
SourceSchrodinger: Is there published pricing?
Only for academic site licences, which start around 7,500 USD a year for a premium package. Commercial pricing is quoted.
SurveyMonkey: What are SurveyMonkey's overage fees?
SurveyMonkey charges AED 0.50 per additional response on paid plans beyond the annual limit included in each tier.
SourceSchrodinger: Do I need my own GPUs?
For FEP+ and Desmond in practice yes, or cloud GPU capacity. Compute is not included in the licence.
Schrodinger: Does Schrodinger compete with its customers?
It runs its own drug pipeline as well as selling software. It manages this through contractual separation, but buyers with sensitive targets should raise it during procurement.
Related pages
More on Schrodinger
More on SurveyMonkey
Other head to heads
- Schrodinger vs Benchling
- Schrodinger vs OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- Schrodinger vs Chemaxon
- Schrodinger vs Dotmatics
- Schrodinger vs REDCap
- Schrodinger vs Medidata Rave
- Schrodinger vs GWI
- Schrodinger vs DNAnexus
- Schrodinger vs Form Bio
- Schrodinger vs Genedata
- Schrodinger vs Paperpile
- Schrodinger vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- Schrodinger vs Florence eBinders
- Schrodinger vs Greenphire
- Schrodinger vs Labguru
- Schrodinger vs Suzy
- Schrodinger vs Zappi
- Schrodinger vs Attest
- Schrodinger vs Mouseflow
- Schrodinger vs Contentsquare
- Schrodinger vs Remesh
- Schrodinger vs SurveySparrow
- Schrodinger vs Obsidian
- Schrodinger vs Dovetail
- Schrodinger vs Valispace
- Schrodinger vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Schrodinger vs Zotero
- Schrodinger vs Mendeley
- SurveyMonkey vs Benchling
- SurveyMonkey vs OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- SurveyMonkey vs Chemaxon
- SurveyMonkey vs Dotmatics
- SurveyMonkey vs REDCap
- SurveyMonkey vs Medidata Rave
- SurveyMonkey vs GWI
- SurveyMonkey vs DNAnexus
- SurveyMonkey vs Form Bio
- SurveyMonkey vs Genedata
- SurveyMonkey vs Paperpile
- SurveyMonkey vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- SurveyMonkey vs Florence eBinders
- SurveyMonkey vs Greenphire
- SurveyMonkey vs Labguru
- SurveyMonkey vs Suzy
- SurveyMonkey vs Zappi
- SurveyMonkey vs Attest
- SurveyMonkey vs Mouseflow
- SurveyMonkey vs Contentsquare
- SurveyMonkey vs Remesh
- SurveyMonkey vs SurveySparrow
- SurveyMonkey vs Obsidian
- SurveyMonkey vs Dovetail
- SurveyMonkey vs Valispace
- SurveyMonkey vs Wolfram Mathematica
- SurveyMonkey vs Zotero
- SurveyMonkey vs Mendeley

