Databases · head to head
Canary Labs vs Zilliz

Canary Labs
Databases
Industrial process historian with published per-tag pricing and no client licence fees
- From
- $3000/year
- Rated
- -

Zilliz
Databases
Managed vector database and vector lakebase for AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Zilliz has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Canary Labs pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.; Zilliz pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
- They diverge on capability: Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Zilliz covers Vector indexing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Canary Labs and Zilliz actually diverge.
| Attribute | Canary Labs | Zilliz |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Per tag band per year | contact-sales |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Founded | Unknown | 2017 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Canary Labs
- Loss-less compression
- Unlimited clients
- Store and forward
- Views service
- Sparkplug B
- Calculation engine
- Axiom
- ODBC and REST
Only in Zilliz
- Vector indexing
- Distributed architecture
- SQL interface
- Tensor support
- Real-time search
- Cloud-native
- Open-source compatible
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Canary Labs
- A manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a PI System enterprise agreementnot Zilliz
- A water utility replacing SCADA-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next SCADA replacementnot Zilliz
- An Ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboardsnot Zilliz
- A plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an auditnot Zilliz
Zilliz
- Build retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systemsnot Canary Labs
- Implement semantic search over documentsnot Canary Labs
- Create multimodal search with text and imagesnot Canary Labs
- Power recommendation engines with vector similaritynot Canary Labs
- Enable similarity search on user embeddingsnot Canary Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Canary Labs
- Pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.
- CustomerCare at 18 percent of licence cost is effectively mandatory on perpetual licences because lapsing it removes upgrades, so the perpetual option is not really a one-time cost.
- The storage format is proprietary; getting data out at volume means the ODBC connector, an additional 2,500 USD one-time or 1,000 USD a year, or writing against the REST API.
- Canary is a small vendor with a limited partner network outside North America, so support coverage and integrator availability in Europe and Asia are thinner than for AVEVA or Ignition.
- It is a Windows-only server product with no Linux or container deployment, which complicates placing collectors in modern edge estates.
Zilliz
- Pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
- Operational complexity for self-hosted Milvus deployments
- Learning curve for those unfamiliar with vector databases
- Limited built-in analytics compared to some alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Canary Labs
$3000/year- Subscription, 3,500 tags$3000/year
- Unlimited Axiom clients
- Unlimited Excel clients
- Support and upgrades included
- Perpetual, 3,500 tags$8730/one-time
- 7,400 USD licence plus 1,330 USD first-year CustomerCare
- CustomerCare renews at 18 percent of licence cost per year
- Unlimited clients
- Private cloud, 3,500 tags$12320/year
- Hosted by Canary
- 1,500 USD one-time setup fee per system
- Scales to around 58,684 USD per year at 60,000 tags
- Enterprise unlimited$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags
- Negotiated licensing terms
- Quoted pricing
Zilliz
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Zilliz review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Canary Labs if
- You need loss-less compression.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want unlimited clients.
Choose Zilliz if
- You need vector indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want distributed architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is Canary Labs or Zilliz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year and Zilliz at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Canary Labs or Zilliz?
- Zilliz has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3000/year for Canary Labs and Free for Zilliz.
- Does Canary Labs or Zilliz run on more platforms?
- Canary Labs runs on Windows, Web. Zilliz runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Zilliz for free?
- Yes. Zilliz has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year.
- What is Canary Labs best used for?
- Canary Labs is most often used for a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement, a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement, an ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboards, a plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an audit. Of those, a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement and a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement are not what Zilliz is typically brought in for.
- What can Canary Labs do that Zilliz cannot?
- Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Unlimited clients, Store and forward, Views service. Zilliz covers Vector indexing, Distributed architecture, SQL interface, Tensor support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Canary Labs: What does Canary cost?
8,730 USD for a 3,500 tag perpetual system including first-year CustomerCare, or 3,000 USD a year on subscription.
Zilliz: What is the difference between Milvus and Zilliz Cloud?
Milvus is the open-source vector database that you can self-host. Zilliz Cloud is the fully managed service built on Milvus that removes operational overhead and handles scaling automatically.
SourceCanary Labs: Are client licences extra?
No. Unlimited Axiom browser clients and unlimited Excel clients are included on every tier.
Zilliz: How many vectors can Zilliz handle?
Milvus and Zilliz Cloud can store and search billions of vectors through their distributed architecture that separates storage and compute layers.
SourceCanary Labs: Is perpetual cheaper than subscription?
Canary states perpetual pays off after roughly three years, and after that you still pay 18 percent CustomerCare annually.
Zilliz: Is Milvus open-source?
Yes, Milvus is open-source under the Apache License 2.0 and is part of the LF AI & Data Foundation.
SourceCanary Labs: Does it use lossy compression?
No. Canary stores every collected value rather than approximating the trend, which matters for regulated data retention.
Zilliz: What pricing does Zilliz Cloud offer?
Zilliz Cloud pricing is not publicly listed and requires contacting their team to discuss your specific scale and use case requirements.
SourceRelated pages
More on Canary Labs
Other head to heads
- Canary Labs vs VerneMQ
- Canary Labs vs EMQX
- Canary Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Canary Labs vs QuestDB
- Canary Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Canary Labs vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Canary Labs vs Apache Doris
- Canary Labs vs Convex
- Canary Labs vs Instaclustr
- Canary Labs vs Cockroach Labs
- Canary Labs vs Meilisearch
- Canary Labs vs DuckDB
- Canary Labs vs BigQuery
- Canary Labs vs CosmosDB
- Canary Labs vs DataStax
- Canary Labs vs dbt
- Canary Labs vs FaunaDB
- Canary Labs vs Qdrant
- Canary Labs vs Vespa
- Canary Labs vs Marqo
- Canary Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Canary Labs vs Typesense
- Canary Labs vs Materialize
- Canary Labs vs OpenSearch
- Canary Labs vs Apache Solr
- Canary Labs vs Readyset
- Canary Labs vs SurrealDB
- Canary Labs vs StarRocks
- Canary Labs vs Teradata
- Canary Labs vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Canary Labs vs Timeplus
- Canary Labs vs turbopuffer
- Zilliz vs VerneMQ
- Zilliz vs EMQX
- Zilliz vs TimescaleDB
- Zilliz vs QuestDB
- Zilliz vs Solace PubSub+
- Zilliz vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Zilliz vs Apache Doris
- Zilliz vs Convex
- Zilliz vs Instaclustr
- Zilliz vs Cockroach Labs
- Zilliz vs Meilisearch
- Zilliz vs DuckDB
- Zilliz vs BigQuery
- Zilliz vs CosmosDB
- Zilliz vs DataStax
- Zilliz vs dbt
- Zilliz vs FaunaDB
- Zilliz vs Qdrant
- Zilliz vs Vespa
- Zilliz vs Marqo
- Zilliz vs Elasticsearch
- Zilliz vs Typesense
- Zilliz vs Materialize
- Zilliz vs OpenSearch
- Zilliz vs Apache Solr
- Zilliz vs Readyset
- Zilliz vs SurrealDB
- Zilliz vs StarRocks
- Zilliz vs Teradata
- Zilliz vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Zilliz vs Timeplus
- Zilliz vs turbopuffer
