Developer Tools · head to head
Garden vs Pulumi

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Pulumi
Cloud
Modern infrastructure as code using programming languages
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.; Pulumi the free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- They diverge on capability: Garden covers Action graph, Pulumi covers Multi-language support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Garden and Pulumi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
Only in Pulumi
- Multi-language support
- Multi-cloud
- State management
- Secrets management
- RBAC
- Stacks
- Automation API
- Policy as Code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Pulumi
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Pulumi
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Pulumi
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Pulumi
Pulumi
- Infrastructure as codenot Garden
- Cloud resource provisioningnot Garden
- DevOps automationnot Garden
- Multi-cloud managementnot Garden
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Pulumi
- The free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- The Team plan is $40 per month base including 40 credits, and caps the organisation at 10 users
- SAML/SSO, RBAC, audit logs and drift detection require the Enterprise plan at $400 per month base
- The per-resource rate rises from $0.1825 per resource per month on Team to $0.365 on Enterprise, so upgrading raises the unit price as well as the base fee
- Managed secrets are billed separately at $0.50 per secret per month on Team and $0.75 on Enterprise
- Self-hosting, SCIM user sync, audit log export and 24x7 support are only in Business Critical, which is custom priced with no published rate
- Team includes up to 500 resources and Enterprise up to 2,000, with everything beyond billed on demand as credits
Pricing, plan by plan
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Pulumi
Free- IndividualFree
- 1 user
- Unlimited projects/stacks
- 500 workflow minutes monthly
- Team$40/month
- Up to 10 users
- Secure collaboration
- CI/CD integration
- Enterprise$400/month
- Unlimited users
- SAML/SSO
- RBAC
- Business Critical$null/custom
- Self-hosting
- Advanced compliance
- SCIM integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Choose Pulumi if
- You need multi-language support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want multi-cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is Garden or Pulumi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Garden starts at Free and Pulumi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Garden or Pulumi?
- Garden starts at Free and Pulumi at Free.
- Does Garden or Pulumi run on more platforms?
- Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes. Pulumi runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- Can I use Garden for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Garden best used for?
- Garden is most often used for a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop, an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production, giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environment, running the identical build and test definition locally and in ci so failures reproduce on a laptop. Of those, a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop and an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production are not what Pulumi is typically brought in for.
- What can Garden do that Pulumi cannot?
- Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds. Pulumi covers Multi-language support, Multi-cloud, State management, Secrets management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Garden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Pulumi: How much does Pulumi cost?
Pulumi offers a free Individual tier forever, Team plan at $40/month with 40 credits, and Enterprise at $400/month with 400 credits. Credit usage varies by resource type and workflow needs.
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Pulumi: What is included in the Pulumi free tier?
The free Individual tier includes 1 user, unlimited projects/stacks, 500 workflow minutes monthly, and 5 million Neo tokens free.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Pulumi: How are Pulumi credits charged?
1 Pulumi Credit equals $1 USD. Credits are drawn from a shared pool. IaC resources cost $0.1825/month per resource on Team and $0.365 on Enterprise; ESC secrets cost $0.50-$0.75/month; workflow minutes cost $0.01 each.
SourceGarden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Pulumi: Does Pulumi offer volume discounts?
Yes, the Enterprise tier ($400/month) includes volume discounts and is designed for approximately 2,000 IaC resources.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Webpack
- Garden vs Vite
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Daytona
- Garden vs Eclipse IDE
- Garden vs SST
- Garden vs Terragrunt
- Garden vs Serverless Framework
- Garden vs Nitric
- Garden vs Encore
- Garden vs Neon
- Garden vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Garden vs DigitalOcean
- Garden vs Grafana Cloud
- Garden vs Crossplane
- Garden vs Rancher
- Garden vs Packer
- Garden vs Oracle Cloud
- Garden vs Orca Security
- Garden vs Porter
- Garden vs Rook
- Pulumi vs Okteto
- Pulumi vs Depot
- Pulumi vs Earthly
- Pulumi vs Ansible
- Pulumi vs WarpBuild
- Pulumi vs Nix
- Pulumi vs Blacksmith
- Pulumi vs Tilt
- Pulumi vs Namespace
- Pulumi vs ConfigCat
- Pulumi vs OpsLevel
- Pulumi vs Webpack
- Pulumi vs Vite
- Pulumi vs Bazel
- Pulumi vs Daytona
- Pulumi vs Eclipse IDE
- Pulumi vs SST
- Pulumi vs Terragrunt
- Pulumi vs Serverless Framework
- Pulumi vs Nitric
- Pulumi vs Encore
- Pulumi vs Neon
- Pulumi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Pulumi vs DigitalOcean
- Pulumi vs Grafana Cloud
- Pulumi vs Crossplane
- Pulumi vs Rancher
- Pulumi vs Packer
- Pulumi vs Oracle Cloud
- Pulumi vs Orca Security
- Pulumi vs Porter
- Pulumi vs Rook
