Cloud · head to head
Caddy vs Chainguard

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer; Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- They diverge on capability: Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Chainguard covers Hardened container images.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Caddy and Chainguard actually diverge.
| Attribute | Caddy | Chainguard |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Licensing by artifact type and team size |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker | Cloud, Container, VM |
| Category | Cloud | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot Chainguard
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot Chainguard
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot Chainguard
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Caddy
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Caddy
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Caddy
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Caddy
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Caddy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Pricing, plan by plan
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Which should you pick?
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Questions people ask
- Is Caddy or Chainguard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Caddy starts at Free and Chainguard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Caddy or Chainguard?
- Caddy starts at Free and Chainguard at Free.
- Does Caddy or Chainguard run on more platforms?
- Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM.
- Can I use Caddy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Caddy best used for?
- Caddy is most often used for sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before, small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants, reverse proxying internal services with tls without a certificate workflow. Of those, sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before and small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants are not what Chainguard is typically brought in for.
- What can Caddy do that Chainguard cannot?
- Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary. Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Caddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceCaddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceCaddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Caddy vs HAProxy
- Caddy vs Packer
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Portworx
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Rancher
- Caddy vs Porter
- Caddy vs Flux
- Caddy vs Contabo
- Caddy vs Coolify
- Caddy vs Crossplane
- Caddy vs Dokku
- Caddy vs Encore
- Caddy vs Vagrant
- Caddy vs Buildah
- Caddy vs Kustomize
- Caddy vs Skopeo
- Caddy vs containerd
- Caddy vs Snyk
- Caddy vs Trivy
- Caddy vs Doppler
- Caddy vs Infisical
- Caddy vs Grype
- Caddy vs Arnica
- Caddy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Caddy vs Bitwarden
- Caddy vs Semgrep
- Caddy vs Authelia
- Caddy vs Endor Labs
- Caddy vs Tenable
- Caddy vs Hanwha Vision
- Caddy vs Idira
- Caddy vs IVPN
- Caddy vs Logto
- Caddy vs Malwarebytes
- Caddy vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs HAProxy
- Chainguard vs Packer
- Chainguard vs Pulumi
- Chainguard vs Portworx
- Chainguard vs Podman
- Chainguard vs Rancher
- Chainguard vs Porter
- Chainguard vs Flux
- Chainguard vs Contabo
- Chainguard vs Coolify
- Chainguard vs Crossplane
- Chainguard vs Dokku
- Chainguard vs Encore
- Chainguard vs Vagrant
- Chainguard vs Buildah
- Chainguard vs Kustomize
- Chainguard vs Skopeo
- Chainguard vs containerd
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

