Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs containerd

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

containerd
Cloud
Industry-standard container runtime, and the engine inside Docker
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; containerd not a developer-facing tool: there is no build command and the CLI is deliberately minimal, so it needs companions like nerdctl or Buildah
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, containerd covers Full container lifecycle.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and containerd actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | containerd |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in containerd
- Full container lifecycle
- CRI support
- OCI compliant
- Snapshotter plugins
- Namespaces
- Stable API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot containerd
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot containerd
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot containerd
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot containerd
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot containerd
containerd
- Running the container runtime under a Kubernetes cluster after the Docker shim removalnot Chainguard
- Building a platform or PaaS that needs to execute containersnot Chainguard
- Reducing the moving parts on nodes that only ever run Kubernetes workloadsnot Chainguard
- Embedding container execution inside another productnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
containerd
- Not a developer-facing tool: there is no build command and the CLI is deliberately minimal, so it needs companions like nerdctl or Buildah
- Debugging is lower-level than Docker, and error messages assume knowledge of the runtime internals
- Documentation is aimed at platform engineers, so newcomers usually find Docker or Podman material more useful
- No image building at all — that is out of scope by design
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
containerd
Free- containerdFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose containerd if
- You need full container lifecycle.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows.
- You also want cri support.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or containerd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and containerd at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or containerd?
- Chainguard starts at Free and containerd at Free.
- Does Chainguard or containerd run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. containerd runs on Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what containerd is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that containerd cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. containerd covers Full container lifecycle, CRI support, OCI compliant, Snapshotter plugins.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
Sourcecontainerd: Is containerd free?
Yes. It is an open-source CNCF graduated project with no licence fee.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
Sourcecontainerd: Do I need containerd if I use Docker?
You already have it. Docker uses containerd underneath to run containers; it is not an alternative you install separately.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
Sourcecontainerd: Why did Kubernetes drop Docker for containerd?
Kubernetes talks to runtimes through the Container Runtime Interface. Docker did not speak CRI natively and needed a shim, so Kubernetes removed the shim and talks to containerd directly, which Docker was already using anyway.
containerd: Can containerd build images?
No. Image building is deliberately out of scope. Tools such as Buildah, BuildKit or Docker handle that.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Podman
- Chainguard vs K3s
- Chainguard vs Crossplane
- Chainguard vs OpenEBS
- Chainguard vs DigitalOcean
- Chainguard vs Portworx
- Chainguard vs Northflank
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Azure
- Chainguard vs Qovery
- Chainguard vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Chainguard vs Vultr
- Chainguard vs Akamai
- Chainguard vs Alibaba Cloud
- Chainguard vs CapRover
- Chainguard vs Chef
- Chainguard vs Buildah
- Chainguard vs Skopeo
- containerd vs Snyk
- containerd vs Trivy
- containerd vs Doppler
- containerd vs Infisical
- containerd vs Grype
- containerd vs Arnica
- containerd vs HashiCorp Vault
- containerd vs Bitwarden
- containerd vs Semgrep
- containerd vs Authelia
- containerd vs Endor Labs
- containerd vs Tenable
- containerd vs Hanwha Vision
- containerd vs Idira
- containerd vs IVPN
- containerd vs Logto
- containerd vs Malwarebytes
- containerd vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- containerd vs Podman
- containerd vs K3s
- containerd vs Crossplane
- containerd vs OpenEBS
- containerd vs DigitalOcean
- containerd vs Portworx
- containerd vs Northflank
- containerd vs Microsoft Azure
- containerd vs Qovery
- containerd vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- containerd vs Vultr
- containerd vs Akamai
- containerd vs Alibaba Cloud
- containerd vs CapRover
- containerd vs Chef
- containerd vs Buildah
- containerd vs Skopeo
