Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Dokku

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Dokku
Cloud
Single-server platform that accepts a git push and runs Heroku buildpacks on Docker
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Dokku one maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Dokku covers Git push deploy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Dokku actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Dokku |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Dokku
- Git push deploy
- Heroku buildpacks
- Datastore plugins
- Automatic certificates
- Zero downtime deploys
- Pluggable schedulers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Dokku
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Dokku
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Dokku
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Dokku
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Dokku
Dokku
- Running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with Heroku style deploymentnot Chainguard
- Moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic hasnot Chainguard
- A consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team Kubernetesnot Chainguard
- Keeping a legacy Procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stacknot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Dokku
- One maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.
- Dokku Pro asks 849 US dollars for a lifetime licence from a project with no disclosed legal entity behind the promise and no published refund terms, while the product is still described as in development at early bird pricing.
- Dokku is single-server by design, and the k3s scheduler that provides multi-node support is missing log retrieval, process inspection and content-based health checks, with a post-run hook the documentation says does not consistently fire.
- Supported operating systems are limited to Ubuntu 22.04 or 24.04 and Debian 11 or later, so organisations standardised on Red Hat, Rocky or Alma Linux cannot run it on their approved base image.
- Backups are separate commands per datastore plugin that you schedule yourself, with no unified snapshot, no point-in-time recovery and no tested restore path, so verifying that a restore works is entirely your responsibility.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Dokku
Free- DokkuFree
- MIT licensed, no usage limits
- Command line and SSH only
- All datastore and certificate plugins
- Dokku Pro$849/one-time
- Lifetime licence with free upgrades and no subscription
- Covers 1 production and 2 pre-production servers
- Web dashboard and JSON REST API
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Dokku if
- You need git push deploy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want heroku buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Dokku better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Dokku at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Dokku?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Dokku at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Dokku run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Dokku runs on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Dokku is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Dokku cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Dokku covers Git push deploy, Heroku buildpacks, Datastore plugins, Automatic certificates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceDokku: Is Dokku still maintained?
Yes. Version 0.38.27 shipped in August 2026 with roughly six releases in the preceding two months. The caveat is that one maintainer writes nearly all of it.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceDokku: What does Dokku Pro give me over the free edition?
A web dashboard, a JSON REST API, git push over HTTPS, browser log tailing, team management and email support from the maintainers. It costs 849 US dollars once for one production and two pre-production servers.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceDokku: Can Dokku run across multiple servers?
Only through the k3s or Nomad schedulers. The k3s path is missing several commands and health check types, and the older Kubernetes scheduler is deprecated and no longer developed.
Dokku: Will my Heroku application run on it unchanged?
Usually. Dokku runs the same buildpacks and reads a Procfile, so the application layer normally moves across. Add-ons, scaling behaviour and backups are the parts you have to rebuild.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Fly.io
- Chainguard vs Render
- Chainguard vs Heroku
- Chainguard vs Coolify
- Chainguard vs CapRover
- Chainguard vs Qovery
- Chainguard vs Porter
- Chainguard vs Railway
- Chainguard vs Northflank
- Chainguard vs Podman
- Chainguard vs Portworx
- Chainguard vs minikube
- Chainguard vs Scaleway
- Chainguard vs SST
- Chainguard vs Tencent Cloud
- Chainguard vs Terragrunt
- Chainguard vs Skopeo
- Dokku vs Snyk
- Dokku vs Trivy
- Dokku vs Doppler
- Dokku vs Infisical
- Dokku vs Grype
- Dokku vs Arnica
- Dokku vs HashiCorp Vault
- Dokku vs Bitwarden
- Dokku vs Semgrep
- Dokku vs Authelia
- Dokku vs Endor Labs
- Dokku vs Tenable
- Dokku vs Hanwha Vision
- Dokku vs Idira
- Dokku vs IVPN
- Dokku vs Logto
- Dokku vs Malwarebytes
- Dokku vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Dokku vs Fly.io
- Dokku vs Render
- Dokku vs Heroku
- Dokku vs Coolify
- Dokku vs CapRover
- Dokku vs Qovery
- Dokku vs Porter
- Dokku vs Railway
- Dokku vs Northflank
- Dokku vs Podman
- Dokku vs Portworx
- Dokku vs minikube
- Dokku vs Scaleway
- Dokku vs SST
- Dokku vs Tencent Cloud
- Dokku vs Terragrunt
- Dokku vs Skopeo
