Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Coolify

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Coolify
Cloud
Open source self-hosted platform that deploys applications and databases to servers you already own
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Coolify commit history since June 2026 shows one maintainer at 73 commits and a second at 15 with nobody else above one, and the same two people also ship four other coolLabs products, so the project depends on a very small number of individuals.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Coolify covers Git push deployments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Coolify actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Coolify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Coolify
- Git push deployments
- One-click services
- Automatic certificates
- Managed databases
- Docker Compose support
- Notifications
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Coolify
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Coolify
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Coolify
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Coolify
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Coolify
Coolify
- Replacing a managed platform bill with a single Hetzner or DigitalOcean instance running a dozen small applicationsnot Chainguard
- An agency hosting many low-traffic client sites on shared servers with certificates handled automaticallynot Chainguard
- Self-hosting analytics, databases and internal tools from the one-click catalogue without writing Compose filesnot Chainguard
- Deploying inside a country or jurisdiction where no managed platform operates a regionnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Coolify
- Commit history since June 2026 shows one maintainer at 73 commits and a second at 15 with nobody else above one, and the same two people also ship four other coolLabs products, so the project depends on a very small number of individuals.
- Multi-server support is documented as experimental, load balancer configuration is manual, every server must share the same CPU architecture, and moving images between hosts requires you to run your own Docker registry.
- In self-hosted mode the Coolify machine holds every SSH key and secret with no documented high availability, so the dashboard host is a single point of failure that the paid Cloud tier fixes and self-hosting does not.
- Scheduled S3 backups cover PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and MongoDB only, so application persistent volumes are your responsibility and a restore is untested unless you test it yourself.
- Release cadence is fast enough that six patch versions shipped inside ten days in August 2026 against several hundred open issues, and because instances can update themselves a regression can reach a production host before you have read the changelog.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Coolify
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0, no features held back
- Unlimited servers, applications and users
- You run, update and back up the dashboard yourself
- Cloud$5/month
- Connects 2 servers, then 3 US dollars a month per extra server
- Managed and updated Coolify dashboard with high availability
- Managed backups of the Coolify instance itself
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Coolify if
- You need git push deployments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want one-click services.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Coolify better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Coolify at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Coolify?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Coolify at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Coolify run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Coolify runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Coolify is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Coolify cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Coolify covers Git push deployments, One-click services, Automatic certificates, Managed databases.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceCoolify: Is anything held back for the paid tier?
No. Coolify Cloud hosts, updates and backs up the dashboard and gives it high availability. Every feature that touches your applications is in the Apache-2.0 build you can run yourself.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceCoolify: What does Coolify Cloud cost?
Five US dollars a month connects two servers, and each additional server is three dollars a month, with 20 per cent off for annual billing. You still supply and pay for the servers themselves.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceCoolify: Does it back up my application data?
It backs up PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and MongoDB to S3 on a schedule. Application persistent volumes are not covered, so anything stored outside a managed database needs your own backup plan.
Coolify: Can I run it across several servers?
Yes, but the documentation calls multi-server experimental. Load balancing is not configured for you, all nodes must share a CPU architecture, and you need to run your own Docker registry.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Render
- Chainguard vs Railway
- Chainguard vs Heroku
- Chainguard vs CapRover
- Chainguard vs Dokku
- Chainguard vs Fly.io
- Chainguard vs Qovery
- Chainguard vs Porter
- Chainguard vs Zeabur
- Chainguard vs Northflank
- Chainguard vs SST
- Chainguard vs Encore
- Chainguard vs HAProxy
- Chainguard vs IBM Cloud
- Chainguard vs kind
- Chainguard vs Koyeb
- Chainguard vs Kustomize
- Chainguard vs Linkerd
- Coolify vs Snyk
- Coolify vs Trivy
- Coolify vs Doppler
- Coolify vs Infisical
- Coolify vs Grype
- Coolify vs Arnica
- Coolify vs HashiCorp Vault
- Coolify vs Bitwarden
- Coolify vs Semgrep
- Coolify vs Authelia
- Coolify vs Endor Labs
- Coolify vs Tenable
- Coolify vs Hanwha Vision
- Coolify vs Idira
- Coolify vs IVPN
- Coolify vs Logto
- Coolify vs Malwarebytes
- Coolify vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Coolify vs Render
- Coolify vs Railway
- Coolify vs Heroku
- Coolify vs CapRover
- Coolify vs Dokku
- Coolify vs Fly.io
- Coolify vs Qovery
- Coolify vs Porter
- Coolify vs Zeabur
- Coolify vs Northflank
- Coolify vs SST
- Coolify vs Encore
- Coolify vs HAProxy
- Coolify vs IBM Cloud
- Coolify vs kind
- Coolify vs Koyeb
- Coolify vs Kustomize
- Coolify vs Linkerd
