Cybersecurity · head to head
Burp Suite vs Syft

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Burp Suite the automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Burp Suite and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | Burp Suite | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Desktop, Api | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 2004 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Burp Suite
- Web vulnerability scanner
- Proxy interceptor
- Intruder
- Repeater
- Sequencer
- Decoder
- Comparer
- Logger
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Burp Suite
- Manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxynot Syft
- Automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the Professional editionnot Syft
- Extending testing with community-built BApp extensionsnot Syft
- Enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through Burp DASTnot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Burp Suite
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Burp Suite
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Burp Suite
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Burp Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Burp Suite
- The automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools
- BApp Store extensions require the Professional edition
- DAST and the agentic testing product are separate enterprise offerings with no published price
- Professional is licensed per user per year rather than perpetually
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Burp Suite
Free- Community EditionFree
- Essential manual tools
- Proxy
- Repeater
- Professional$449/year
- All Community features
- Burp Scanner
- Advanced manual tools
- Enterprise$6995/year
- CI/CD integration
- Scheduled scans
- Role-based access
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Burp Suite if
- You need web vulnerability scanner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want proxy interceptor.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Burp Suite or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Burp Suite starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Burp Suite or Syft?
- Burp Suite starts at Free and Syft at Free.
- Does Burp Suite or Syft run on more platforms?
- Burp Suite runs on Desktop, Api. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Burp Suite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Burp Suite best used for?
- Burp Suite is most often used for manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy, automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition, extending testing with community-built bapp extensions, enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through burp dast. Of those, manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy and automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Burp Suite do that Syft cannot?
- Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Proxy interceptor, Intruder, Repeater. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Burp Suite: Does Burp Suite offer a free version?
Yes, Burp Suite Community Edition is available free and supports manual testing. The page does not provide specific details on additional paid editions or their pricing.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Burp Suite: What features are available in the free edition?
Burp Suite Community Edition supports manual security testing, though specific feature limitations compared to paid editions are not detailed on this page. Visit individual product pages for detailed tier comparisons.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Burp Suite: Are paid versions of Burp Suite available?
Yes, PortSwigger offers Burp Suite Professional and Burp Suite DAST as paid products, though specific pricing and feature details are not available on the main product page.
SourceSyft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Burp Suite vs 1Password
- Burp Suite vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Burp Suite vs Norton 360
- Burp Suite vs LastPass
- Burp Suite vs Metasploit
- Burp Suite vs Acunetix
- Burp Suite vs OWASP ZAP
- Burp Suite vs Nessus
- Burp Suite vs BigID
- Burp Suite vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Burp Suite vs LogicManager
- Burp Suite vs Mullvad VPN
- Burp Suite vs Private Internet Access
- Burp Suite vs Quantexa
- Burp Suite vs Termly
- Burp Suite vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Burp Suite vs Tenable Nessus
- Burp Suite vs Cosign
- Burp Suite vs Sigstore
- Burp Suite vs Trivy
- Burp Suite vs Chainguard
- Burp Suite vs Wireshark
- Burp Suite vs Semgrep
- Burp Suite vs Legit Security
- Burp Suite vs HashiCorp Vault
- Burp Suite vs Bitwarden
- Burp Suite vs Infisical
- Burp Suite vs Transmit Security
- Burp Suite vs TrustArc
- Burp Suite vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Burp Suite vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs 1Password
- Syft vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Syft vs Norton 360
- Syft vs LastPass
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Acunetix
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs Nessus
- Syft vs BigID
- Syft vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Syft vs LogicManager
- Syft vs Mullvad VPN
- Syft vs Private Internet Access
- Syft vs Quantexa
- Syft vs Termly
- Syft vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black

