Cybersecurity · head to head
Burp Suite vs Cosign

Cosign
Cybersecurity
Signs and verifies container images and artifacts, with or without managing keys
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Burp Suite the automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools; Cosign keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.
- They diverge on capability: Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Cosign covers Keyless signing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Burp Suite and Cosign actually diverge.
| Attribute | Burp Suite | Cosign |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Desktop, Api | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 2004 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Burp Suite
- Web vulnerability scanner
- Proxy interceptor
- Intruder
- Repeater
- Sequencer
- Decoder
- Comparer
- Logger
Only in Cosign
- Keyless signing
- Key and KMS signing
- Registry-native storage
- In-toto attestations
- Offline verification
- Trusted root and signing config
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Burp Suite
- Manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxynot Cosign
- Automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the Professional editionnot Cosign
- Extending testing with community-built BApp extensionsnot Cosign
- Enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through Burp DASTnot Cosign
Cosign
- Signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keysnot Burp Suite
- Attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenancenot Burp Suite
- Meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifactsnot Burp Suite
- Verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registrynot Burp Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Burp Suite
- The automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools
- BApp Store extensions require the Professional edition
- DAST and the agentic testing product are separate enterprise offerings with no published price
- Professional is licensed per user per year rather than perpetually
Cosign
- Keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.
- A signature proves who signed, never whether they should have. The documentation is explicit that Sigstore cannot determine authorisation, so every consumer must write and maintain their own identity and issuer policy or verification means nothing.
- Nothing is enforced without an admission controller. Signing changes what you can prove, not what runs, and the official policy controller has a small maintainer base for a component sitting in a cluster admission path.
- Upgrades break pipelines. Version 3 changed defaults, version 4 is announced as removing legacy functionality and roughly half the command line flags, and two official client libraries still lacked support for the new log format as of mid 2026.
- Signatures do not expire. An artifact signed before a maintainer account was compromised and one signed after are indistinguishable unless somebody is actively monitoring the transparency log, and almost nobody is.
Pricing, plan by plan
Burp Suite
Free- Community EditionFree
- Essential manual tools
- Proxy
- Repeater
- Professional$449/year
- All Community features
- Burp Scanner
- Advanced manual tools
- Enterprise$6995/year
- CI/CD integration
- Scheduled scans
- Role-based access
Cosign
Free- CosignFree
- Apache-2.0
- Public Sigstore infrastructure free to use
- No usage limits published
Which should you pick?
Choose Burp Suite if
- You need web vulnerability scanner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want proxy interceptor.
Choose Cosign if
- You need keyless signing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want key and kms signing.
Questions people ask
- Is Burp Suite or Cosign better?
- Neither clearly leads. Burp Suite starts at Free and Cosign at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Burp Suite or Cosign?
- Burp Suite starts at Free and Cosign at Free.
- Does Burp Suite or Cosign run on more platforms?
- Burp Suite runs on Desktop, Api. Cosign runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Burp Suite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Burp Suite best used for?
- Burp Suite is most often used for manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy, automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition, extending testing with community-built bapp extensions, enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through burp dast. Of those, manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy and automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition are not what Cosign is typically brought in for.
- What can Burp Suite do that Cosign cannot?
- Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Proxy interceptor, Intruder, Repeater. Cosign covers Keyless signing, Key and KMS signing, Registry-native storage, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Burp Suite: Does Burp Suite offer a free version?
Yes, Burp Suite Community Edition is available free and supports manual testing. The page does not provide specific details on additional paid editions or their pricing.
SourceCosign: Does Cosign tell me if an image is vulnerable?
No. It has no vulnerability knowledge whatsoever. It can carry an SBOM as a signed attestation but never reads it. Pair it with a scanner.
Burp Suite: What features are available in the free edition?
Burp Suite Community Edition supports manual security testing, though specific feature limitations compared to paid editions are not detailed on this page. Visit individual product pages for detailed tier comparisons.
SourceCosign: Is signing alone enough?
No. Verification is a command somebody runs. Without an admission controller enforcing it, an unsigned image still runs.
Burp Suite: Are paid versions of Burp Suite available?
Yes, PortSwigger offers Burp Suite Professional and Burp Suite DAST as paid products, though specific pricing and feature details are not available on the main product page.
SourceCosign: What does a bare cosign verify actually prove?
Very little. Without a pinned certificate identity and OIDC issuer, it accepts a valid signature from any identity at all.
Cosign: What is the risk of keyless signing?
Your OIDC provider becomes the root of trust. Compromise of that account yields genuine, verifiable signatures, so account security is the control that matters.
Cosign: Should we expect breaking changes?
Yes. Version 4 is announced to remove roughly half the flags, and a post-quantum migration is named as a further breaking change after that.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Burp Suite vs 1Password
- Burp Suite vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Burp Suite vs Norton 360
- Burp Suite vs LastPass
- Burp Suite vs Metasploit
- Burp Suite vs Acunetix
- Burp Suite vs OWASP ZAP
- Burp Suite vs Nessus
- Burp Suite vs BigID
- Burp Suite vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Burp Suite vs LogicManager
- Burp Suite vs Mullvad VPN
- Burp Suite vs Private Internet Access
- Burp Suite vs Quantexa
- Burp Suite vs Termly
- Burp Suite vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Burp Suite vs Tenable Nessus
- Burp Suite vs Sigstore
- Burp Suite vs Syft
- Burp Suite vs Chainguard
- Burp Suite vs HashiCorp Vault
- Burp Suite vs Infisical
- Burp Suite vs Wireshark
- Burp Suite vs Bitwarden
- Burp Suite vs Semgrep
- Burp Suite vs Trivy
- Burp Suite vs authentik
- Burp Suite vs Microsoft Intune
- Burp Suite vs Netwrix
- Burp Suite vs NordVPN
- Burp Suite vs Omada Identity
- Burp Suite vs Ory
- Burp Suite vs ProtonVPN
- Burp Suite vs Grype
- Cosign vs 1Password
- Cosign vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cosign vs Norton 360
- Cosign vs LastPass
- Cosign vs Metasploit
- Cosign vs Acunetix
- Cosign vs OWASP ZAP
- Cosign vs Nessus
- Cosign vs BigID
- Cosign vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Cosign vs LogicManager
- Cosign vs Mullvad VPN
- Cosign vs Private Internet Access
- Cosign vs Quantexa
- Cosign vs Termly
- Cosign vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Cosign vs Tenable Nessus
- Cosign vs Sigstore
- Cosign vs Syft
- Cosign vs Chainguard
- Cosign vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cosign vs Infisical
- Cosign vs Wireshark
- Cosign vs Bitwarden
- Cosign vs Semgrep
- Cosign vs Trivy
- Cosign vs authentik
- Cosign vs Microsoft Intune
- Cosign vs Netwrix
- Cosign vs NordVPN
- Cosign vs Omada Identity
- Cosign vs Ory
- Cosign vs ProtonVPN
- Cosign vs Grype

