Cybersecurity · head to head
Private Internet Access vs Syft
Private Internet Access
Cybersecurity
Long-standing VPN service with a large server network and flexible multi-year plans
- From
- $11.99/month
- Rated
- -

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Private Internet Access monthly plan is priced noticeably higher than the discounted multi-year commitments, penalizing short-term users.; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: Private Internet Access covers Split tunneling, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Private Internet Access and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | Private Internet Access | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $11.99/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | windows, mac, linux, ios, android | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Private Internet Access
- Split tunneling
- Kill switch
- Ad and tracker blocking
- Dedicated IP add-on
- Bundled antivirus add-on
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Private Internet Access
- Encrypting traffic on public Wi-Fi with a kill switchnot Syft
- Blocking ads and trackers network-wide via MACEnot Syft
- Maintaining a consistent connection identity with a dedicated IP add-onnot Syft
- Committing to a long-term plan for a lower effective monthly ratenot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Private Internet Access
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Private Internet Access
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Private Internet Access
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Private Internet Access
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Private Internet Access
- Monthly plan is priced noticeably higher than the discounted multi-year commitments, penalizing short-term users.
- Dedicated IP and antivirus are paid add-ons rather than included features.
- Headquartered in a jurisdiction whose privacy reputation some competitors market against, despite audited no-logs claims.
- App interface is less streamlined than some higher-priced premium VPN competitors.
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Private Internet Access
$11.99/month- Monthly$11.99/month
- Billed month to month
- Full server network access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
- 1-Year$3.1/month
- Billed annually at $37.19
- Full server network access
- 2-Year$2.19/month
- Lowest advertised rate, billed every 2 years
- Full server network access
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Private Internet Access if
- You need split tunneling.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want kill switch.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Private Internet Access or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Private Internet Access starts at $11.99/month and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Private Internet Access or Syft?
- Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $11.99/month for Private Internet Access and Free for Syft.
- Does Private Internet Access or Syft run on more platforms?
- Private Internet Access runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Syft for free?
- Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Private Internet Access starts at $11.99/month.
- What is Private Internet Access best used for?
- Private Internet Access is most often used for encrypting traffic on public wi-fi with a kill switch, blocking ads and trackers network-wide via mace, maintaining a consistent connection identity with a dedicated ip add-on, committing to a long-term plan for a lower effective monthly rate. Of those, encrypting traffic on public wi-fi with a kill switch and blocking ads and trackers network-wide via mace are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Private Internet Access do that Syft cannot?
- Private Internet Access covers Split tunneling, Kill switch, Ad and tracker blocking, Dedicated IP add-on. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on Private Internet Access
Other head to heads
- Private Internet Access vs Mullvad VPN
- Private Internet Access vs Windscribe
- Private Internet Access vs IVPN
- Private Internet Access vs TunnelBear
- Private Internet Access vs Avast One
- Private Internet Access vs CyberGhost VPN
- Private Internet Access vs NordVPN
- Private Internet Access vs ProtonVPN
- Private Internet Access vs Enpass
- Private Internet Access vs Surfshark
- Private Internet Access vs BigID
- Private Internet Access vs Infisical
- Private Internet Access vs JumpCloud
- Private Internet Access vs McAfee Total Protection
- Private Internet Access vs NICE Actimize
- Private Internet Access vs Semgrep
- Private Internet Access vs Spot AI
- Private Internet Access vs ExpressVPN
- Private Internet Access vs Cosign
- Private Internet Access vs Sigstore
- Private Internet Access vs Trivy
- Private Internet Access vs Chainguard
- Private Internet Access vs Metasploit
- Private Internet Access vs Wireshark
- Private Internet Access vs Legit Security
- Private Internet Access vs OWASP ZAP
- Private Internet Access vs HashiCorp Vault
- Private Internet Access vs Bitwarden
- Private Internet Access vs Tenable Nessus
- Private Internet Access vs Transmit Security
- Private Internet Access vs TrustArc
- Private Internet Access vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Private Internet Access vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Mullvad VPN
- Syft vs Windscribe
- Syft vs IVPN
- Syft vs TunnelBear
- Syft vs Avast One
- Syft vs CyberGhost VPN
- Syft vs NordVPN
- Syft vs ProtonVPN
- Syft vs Enpass
- Syft vs Surfshark
- Syft vs BigID
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs JumpCloud
- Syft vs McAfee Total Protection
- Syft vs NICE Actimize
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Spot AI
- Syft vs ExpressVPN
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black
