Cybersecurity · head to head
Burp Suite vs Garden

Burp Suite
Cybersecurity
The leading toolkit for web security testing
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Burp Suite the automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools; Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- They diverge on capability: Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Garden covers Action graph.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Burp Suite and Garden actually diverge.
| Attribute | Burp Suite | Garden |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Desktop, Api | Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2004 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Burp Suite
- Web vulnerability scanner
- Proxy interceptor
- Intruder
- Repeater
- Sequencer
- Decoder
- Comparer
- Logger
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Burp Suite
- Manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxynot Garden
- Automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the Professional editionnot Garden
- Extending testing with community-built BApp extensionsnot Garden
- Enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through Burp DASTnot Garden
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Burp Suite
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Burp Suite
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Burp Suite
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Burp Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Burp Suite
- The automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools
- BApp Store extensions require the Professional edition
- DAST and the agentic testing product are separate enterprise offerings with no published price
- Professional is licensed per user per year rather than perpetually
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Pricing, plan by plan
Burp Suite
Free- Community EditionFree
- Essential manual tools
- Proxy
- Repeater
- Professional$449/year
- All Community features
- Burp Scanner
- Advanced manual tools
- Enterprise$6995/year
- CI/CD integration
- Scheduled scans
- Role-based access
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Which should you pick?
Choose Burp Suite if
- You need web vulnerability scanner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want proxy interceptor.
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Burp Suite or Garden better?
- Neither clearly leads. Burp Suite starts at Free and Garden at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Burp Suite or Garden?
- Burp Suite starts at Free and Garden at Free.
- Does Burp Suite or Garden run on more platforms?
- Burp Suite runs on Desktop, Api. Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Burp Suite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Burp Suite best used for?
- Burp Suite is most often used for manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy, automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition, extending testing with community-built bapp extensions, enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through burp dast. Of those, manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxy and automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the professional edition are not what Garden is typically brought in for.
- What can Burp Suite do that Garden cannot?
- Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Proxy interceptor, Intruder, Repeater. Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Burp Suite: Does Burp Suite offer a free version?
Yes, Burp Suite Community Edition is available free and supports manual testing. The page does not provide specific details on additional paid editions or their pricing.
SourceGarden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Burp Suite: What features are available in the free edition?
Burp Suite Community Edition supports manual security testing, though specific feature limitations compared to paid editions are not detailed on this page. Visit individual product pages for detailed tier comparisons.
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Burp Suite: Are paid versions of Burp Suite available?
Yes, PortSwigger offers Burp Suite Professional and Burp Suite DAST as paid products, though specific pricing and feature details are not available on the main product page.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Garden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Burp Suite vs 1Password
- Burp Suite vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Burp Suite vs Norton 360
- Burp Suite vs LastPass
- Burp Suite vs Metasploit
- Burp Suite vs Acunetix
- Burp Suite vs OWASP ZAP
- Burp Suite vs Nessus
- Burp Suite vs BigID
- Burp Suite vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Burp Suite vs LogicManager
- Burp Suite vs Mullvad VPN
- Burp Suite vs Private Internet Access
- Burp Suite vs Quantexa
- Burp Suite vs Termly
- Burp Suite vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Burp Suite vs Tenable Nessus
- Burp Suite vs Okteto
- Burp Suite vs Ansible
- Burp Suite vs Depot
- Burp Suite vs Earthly
- Burp Suite vs Tilt
- Burp Suite vs WarpBuild
- Burp Suite vs Nix
- Burp Suite vs Blacksmith
- Burp Suite vs Namespace
- Burp Suite vs ConfigCat
- Burp Suite vs OpsLevel
- Burp Suite vs Bazel
- Burp Suite vs Visual Studio
- Burp Suite vs Warp
- Burp Suite vs Xlinesoft
- Burp Suite vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Burp Suite vs GNU Emacs
- Burp Suite vs Keil MDK
- Garden vs 1Password
- Garden vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Garden vs Norton 360
- Garden vs LastPass
- Garden vs Metasploit
- Garden vs Acunetix
- Garden vs OWASP ZAP
- Garden vs Nessus
- Garden vs BigID
- Garden vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Garden vs LogicManager
- Garden vs Mullvad VPN
- Garden vs Private Internet Access
- Garden vs Quantexa
- Garden vs Termly
- Garden vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Garden vs Tenable Nessus
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Visual Studio
- Garden vs Warp
- Garden vs Xlinesoft
- Garden vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Garden vs GNU Emacs
- Garden vs Keil MDK
