Developer Tools · head to head
Garden vs Nessus

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Nessus
Cybersecurity
The most trusted vulnerability assessment solution
- From
- $4790/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Garden has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.; Nessus nessus Professional is $4,790 for one year, with no free or low cost commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Garden covers Action graph, Nessus covers Vulnerability scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Garden and Nessus actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
Only in Nessus
- Vulnerability scanning
- Configuration auditing
- Malware detection
- Web application scanning
- Cloud scanning
- Compliance checks
- Patch auditing
- Pre-built policies
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Nessus
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Nessus
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Nessus
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Nessus
Nessus
- Vulnerability scanning for individual practitionersnot Garden
- Enterprise vulnerability managementnot Garden
- Web application security assessmentsnot Garden
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Nessus
- Nessus Professional is $4,790 for one year, with no free or low cost commercial tier
- Multi year terms are the only discount route, at $9,330.95 for two years and $13,637.54 for three
- It is a single user scanner, so team workflows mean migrating to another Tenable product
- Tenable One vulnerability management is priced separately, starting at $3,500 a year for 100 assets
Pricing, plan by plan
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Nessus
$4790/year- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- 1 year license
- Best for individual security professionals
- Nessus Professional 2-Year$9330.95/2 years
- 2 year license with discounted rate vs. annual
- Nessus Professional 3-Year$13637.54/3 years
- 3 year license with discounted rate vs. annual
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- 1 year license
- Enhanced capabilities vs. Professional
Which should you pick?
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Choose Nessus if
- You need vulnerability scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want configuration auditing.
Questions people ask
- Is Garden or Nessus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Garden starts at Free and Nessus at $4790/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Garden or Nessus?
- Garden has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Garden and $4790/year for Nessus.
- Does Garden or Nessus run on more platforms?
- Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes. Nessus runs on Desktop, Api.
- Can I use Garden for free?
- Yes. Garden has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Nessus starts at $4790/year.
- What is Garden best used for?
- Garden is most often used for a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop, an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production, giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environment, running the identical build and test definition locally and in ci so failures reproduce on a laptop. Of those, a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop and an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production are not what Nessus is typically brought in for.
- What can Garden do that Nessus cannot?
- Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds. Nessus covers Vulnerability scanning, Configuration auditing, Malware detection, Web application scanning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Garden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Nessus: What is the cheapest Nessus option?
Nessus Professional starts at $4,790 per year for a 1-year license. Multi-year commitments offer discounts, with 2-year licenses at $9,330.95 and 3-year licenses at $13,637.54.
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Nessus: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Expert?
Nessus Expert costs $6,790 per year for a 1-year license (compared to $4,790 for Professional) and includes enhanced capabilities. Multi-year rates are available at discounted prices.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Nessus: Does Nessus offer optional support or training?
Yes, Nessus offers add-on services: Advanced Support at $400/year provides 24x365 access to phone, email, community, and chat support. On-Demand Training costs $275/year for Fundamentals course access or $385/year for both Fundamentals and Advanced courses.
SourceGarden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Visual Studio
- Garden vs Warp
- Garden vs Xlinesoft
- Garden vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Garden vs GNU Emacs
- Garden vs Keil MDK
- Garden vs 1Password
- Garden vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Garden vs Norton 360
- Garden vs LastPass
- Garden vs Qualys VMDR
- Garden vs Mimecast
- Garden vs Arnica
- Garden vs Burp Suite
- Garden vs Acunetix
- Garden vs KnowBe4
- Garden vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Garden vs Omada Identity
- Garden vs Jumio
- Garden vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Garden vs LogicManager
- Garden vs Mullvad VPN
- Garden vs Private Internet Access
- Garden vs Quantexa
- Nessus vs Okteto
- Nessus vs Ansible
- Nessus vs Depot
- Nessus vs Earthly
- Nessus vs Tilt
- Nessus vs WarpBuild
- Nessus vs Nix
- Nessus vs Blacksmith
- Nessus vs Namespace
- Nessus vs ConfigCat
- Nessus vs OpsLevel
- Nessus vs Bazel
- Nessus vs Visual Studio
- Nessus vs Warp
- Nessus vs Xlinesoft
- Nessus vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Nessus vs GNU Emacs
- Nessus vs Keil MDK
- Nessus vs 1Password
- Nessus vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Nessus vs Norton 360
- Nessus vs LastPass
- Nessus vs Qualys VMDR
- Nessus vs Mimecast
- Nessus vs Arnica
- Nessus vs Burp Suite
- Nessus vs Acunetix
- Nessus vs KnowBe4
- Nessus vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Nessus vs Omada Identity
- Nessus vs Jumio
- Nessus vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Nessus vs LogicManager
- Nessus vs Mullvad VPN
- Nessus vs Private Internet Access
- Nessus vs Quantexa
