Construction · head to head
Buildots vs Prospect

Buildots
Construction
Hard hat mounted 360 cameras and computer vision that score build progress against the BIM model
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Buildots tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.; Prospect no longer available as a standalone product; has been discontinued and replaced by other solutions
- They diverge on capability: Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Prospect covers BIM visualization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildots and Prospect actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildots
- Hard hat 360 capture
- Model to as-built comparison
- Per activity progress scoring
- Programme deviation alerts
- Delay forecasting
- Visual evidence trail
- Subcontractor performance reporting
Only in Prospect
- BIM visualization
- Real-scale viewing
- Collaboration
- Annotations
- Revit
- SketchUp
- Rhino
- Navisworks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildots
- A residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle timenot Prospect
- A hospital or data centre fit-out where MEP first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every monthnot Prospect
- A developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment applicationnot Prospect
- A contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumptionnot Prospect
Prospect
- VR Gamingnot Buildots
- AR Marketingnot Buildots
- Virtual Trainingnot Buildots
- 3D Visualizationnot Buildots
- Immersive Experiencesnot Buildots
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildots
- Tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.
- The data only arrives if someone walks the site every week with the camera, so coverage decays quietly when the site team is under pressure, exactly when the reporting is most needed.
- Pricing is per project rather than per seat and includes hardware, so a contractor cannot roll it out cheaply across a portfolio of small jobs and it is uneconomic below a certain project value.
- It reads interior fit-out and repetitive vertical work far better than structure, groundworks or external envelope, so a large fraction of a project's programme is outside what it can score.
- Making progress objective creates commercial friction with subcontractors whose valuations have historically been negotiated, and contractors who deploy it without addressing that in the subcontract get pushback rather than adoption.
Prospect
- No longer available as a standalone product; has been discontinued and replaced by other solutions
- Acquisition by The Wild in 2021 resulted in product discontinuation and transition to Workshop XR
- No ongoing development, bug fixes, or feature updates since acquisition
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildots
On request- Buildots$undefined/year
- Priced per project by size and duration
- Camera hardware included in the engagement
- Model onboarding and setup quoted separately
Prospect
$225/month- Team$350/month
- Multiuser VR collaboration
- Design review tools
- Voice communication
Which should you pick?
Choose Buildots if
- You need hard hat 360 capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want model to as-built comparison.
Choose Prospect if
- You need bim visualization.
- You work on VR Headsets (Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, Meta Quest).
- You also want real-scale viewing.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildots or Prospect better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildots starts at On request and Prospect at $225/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildots or Prospect?
- Buildots starts at On request and Prospect at $225/month.
- Does Buildots or Prospect run on more platforms?
- Buildots runs on Web, iOS, Android. Prospect runs on VR Headsets (Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, Meta Quest).
- What is Buildots best used for?
- Buildots is most often used for a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time, a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month, a developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment application, a contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumption. Of those, a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time and a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month are not what Prospect is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildots do that Prospect cannot?
- Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Model to as-built comparison, Per activity progress scoring, Programme deviation alerts. Prospect covers BIM visualization, Real-scale viewing, Collaboration, Annotations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildots: What does Buildots cost?
It is quoted per project based on size, duration and scope, with camera hardware included. Nothing is published.
Prospect: What is Prospect by IrisVR?
Prospect was an immersive VR application that converted 3D design files from Revit, Rhino, SketchUp, and Navisworks into virtual reality walkthroughs with one click. It enabled AEC teams to conduct design reviews, collaborate in VR, and present projects to clients immersively.
SourceBuildots: Do I need a BIM model?
Yes. The system scores progress by comparing captured conditions against model objects, so the model quality sets the ceiling on accuracy.
Prospect: Is Prospect still available?
No. Prospect by IrisVR was acquired by The Wild in February 2021 and has been discontinued. Autodesk Workshop XR is now the recommended successor for AEC teams migrating from Prospect.
SourceBuildots: What kind of projects suit it?
Repetitive vertical work with heavy interior fit-out. Civil, groundworks and external envelope are poorly covered.
Prospect: How was Prospect priced?
Prospect's Team plan cost approximately $350 per workstation per month when billed annually. Earlier pricing information from 2020 showed starting prices around $225. Custom enterprise pricing was available.
SourceBuildots: Who does the site walks?
Your own site team, typically once or twice a week. There is no Buildots operator on site.
Prospect: What VR headsets did Prospect support?
Prospect was compatible with major VR headsets including Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, and later Meta Quest. Support depended on the runtime and connection method available.
SourceProspect: What was Prospect's biggest advantage?
Prospect's one-click conversion from native design files (Revit, Rhino, SketchUp) into immersive VR experiences was its primary value proposition, enabling non-VR specialists to easily create compelling design reviews and client presentations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Buildots vs Openspace
- Buildots vs Procore
- Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Buildots vs Dalux
- Buildots vs RIB CostX
- Buildots vs Autodesk Revit
- Buildots vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Buildots vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Buildots vs Togal.AI
- Buildots vs BricsCAD BIM
- Buildots vs Cubit Estimating
- Buildots vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Buildots vs Viewpoint Vista
- Buildots vs Briq
- Buildots vs Buildertrend
- Buildots vs ConstructConnect
- Buildots vs BuildingConnected
- Buildots vs Cone
- Buildots vs Subskribe
- Buildots vs GetAccept
- Buildots vs HelloSign
- Buildots vs Microsoft Dynamics 365
- Buildots vs Responsive
- Buildots vs Bidsketch
- Buildots vs Dubsado
- Buildots vs HoneyBook
- Buildots vs Nutshell
- Buildots vs 17hats
- Buildots vs Indy
- Buildots vs Moxie
- Buildots vs Nusii
- Buildots vs Paperbell
- Buildots vs Prospero
- Buildots vs Quoter
- Prospect vs Openspace
- Prospect vs Procore
- Prospect vs Reconstruct
- Prospect vs Dalux
- Prospect vs RIB CostX
- Prospect vs Autodesk Revit
- Prospect vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Prospect vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Prospect vs Togal.AI
- Prospect vs BricsCAD BIM
- Prospect vs Cubit Estimating
- Prospect vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Prospect vs Viewpoint Vista
- Prospect vs Briq
- Prospect vs Buildertrend
- Prospect vs ConstructConnect
- Prospect vs BuildingConnected
- Prospect vs Cone
- Prospect vs Subskribe
- Prospect vs GetAccept
- Prospect vs HelloSign
- Prospect vs Microsoft Dynamics 365
- Prospect vs Responsive
- Prospect vs Bidsketch
- Prospect vs Dubsado
- Prospect vs HoneyBook
- Prospect vs Nutshell
- Prospect vs 17hats
- Prospect vs Indy
- Prospect vs Moxie
- Prospect vs Nusii
- Prospect vs Paperbell
- Prospect vs Prospero
- Prospect vs Quoter

