Productivity · head to head
Bluedot vs Obsidian

Bluedot
Productivity
Bot-free meeting recorder and AI note taker that runs as a browser extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Obsidian
Research
A powerful knowledge base on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bluedot cancelling ends access immediately and recordings are permanently deleted after thirty days, so the product is unsuitable as a meeting archive and any record you need to keep must be exported before the subscription lapses.; Obsidian sync is a paid add-on at $4 per month billed annually rather than part of the app
- They diverge on capability: Bluedot covers Bot-free capture, Obsidian covers Bidirectional linking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bluedot and Obsidian actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bluedot
- Bot-free capture
- Transcript-based video editing
- Custom note templates
- Record-only seat pricing
- CRM and ATS push
- Imports
- Webhooks
- SSO and SCIM
Only in Obsidian
- Bidirectional linking
- Graph view visualization
- Markdown support
- Local file storage
- Plugin ecosystem
- Custom CSS themes
- Templates
- Search and tags
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bluedot
- A sales team where prospects decline to admit recording bots but the manager still needs call notes in the CRMnot Obsidian
- A recruiter conducting interviews who wants a structured summary per candidate without a visible third party in the callnot Obsidian
- A customer success team of thirty where only four people run calls, so per-recorder pricing costs a fraction of a per-seat competitornot Obsidian
- Cutting a short clip from a long call to share internally, done by deleting text from the transcript rather than opening a video editornot Obsidian
Obsidian
- Local-first markdown note taking with no account requirednot Bluedot
- Linking notes into a personal knowledge graphnot Bluedot
- Syncing a vault across devices with end-to-end encryption on the paid add-onnot Bluedot
- Publishing a public site from a vaultnot Bluedot
- Extending the editor with community pluginsnot Bluedot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bluedot
- Cancelling ends access immediately and recordings are permanently deleted after thirty days, so the product is unsuitable as a meeting archive and any record you need to keep must be exported before the subscription lapses.
- The Basic tier at $14 records audio only and caps recordings at one hour, which excludes most workshops, training sessions and long client calls and pushes anyone with real meetings to Pro.
- The free tier gives five meetings in total rather than five a month, so it functions as an extended trial and cannot be used as a genuine free option for occasional users.
- Recording without a visible bot removes the prompt that alerts participants, but not the consent obligation in jurisdictions requiring all parties to agree, and the product design makes that omission easy to overlook.
- It is a small independent vendor in a category where Zoom, Microsoft and Google now bundle equivalent summarisation into subscriptions customers already hold, which is sustained pressure on both pricing and survival.
Obsidian
- Sync is a paid add-on at $4 per month billed annually rather than part of the app
- Publishing to the web is a further $8 per month per site
- Commercial use asks for a $50 per user per year licence, though the vendor states it is not required
- Collaboration is limited compared with a hosted notes tool, since the vault is local files first
Pricing, plan by plan
Bluedot
Free- FreeFree
- 5 meetings in total, not per month
- Chrome extension and desktop and mobile apps
- Basic integrations
- Basic$14/month
- Unlimited audio meetings
- One hour maximum per recording
- Webhook access
- Pro$20/month
- Video meetings as well as audio
- No recording duration limit
- Custom templates
- Business$32/month
- CRM and applicant tracking integrations
- SSO and SCIM
- Admin controls
Obsidian
Free- Obsidian Sync$4/month
- Sync notes across devices
- Obsidian Publish$8/month
- Turn notes into a website
Which should you pick?
Choose Bluedot if
- You need bot-free capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Chrome, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want transcript-based video editing.
Choose Obsidian if
- You need bidirectional linking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want graph view visualization.
Questions people ask
- Is Bluedot or Obsidian better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bluedot starts at Free and Obsidian at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bluedot or Obsidian?
- Bluedot starts at Free and Obsidian at Free.
- Does Bluedot or Obsidian run on more platforms?
- Bluedot runs on Web, Chrome, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Obsidian runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Bluedot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bluedot best used for?
- Bluedot is most often used for a sales team where prospects decline to admit recording bots but the manager still needs call notes in the crm, a recruiter conducting interviews who wants a structured summary per candidate without a visible third party in the call, a customer success team of thirty where only four people run calls, so per-recorder pricing costs a fraction of a per-seat competitor, cutting a short clip from a long call to share internally, done by deleting text from the transcript rather than opening a video editor. Of those, a sales team where prospects decline to admit recording bots but the manager still needs call notes in the crm and a recruiter conducting interviews who wants a structured summary per candidate without a visible third party in the call are not what Obsidian is typically brought in for.
- What can Bluedot do that Obsidian cannot?
- Bluedot covers Bot-free capture, Transcript-based video editing, Custom note templates, Record-only seat pricing. Obsidian covers Bidirectional linking, Graph view visualization, Markdown support, Local file storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bluedot: Does Bluedot join the meeting as a bot?
No. It captures through the browser extension or desktop app, so no additional participant is visible to anyone in the call.
Obsidian: Is Obsidian free?
Yes. The core Obsidian application is 100% free for personal and commercial use with no limitations. You can use unlimited vaults and every core feature without payment.
SourceBluedot: How is it priced?
Per workspace, with charges only for users who record. Free covers five meetings in total, Basic is $14, Pro is $20 and Business is $32 a month on annual billing.
Obsidian: What file format does Obsidian use?
Obsidian stores every note as a plain Markdown file. Because it uses standard Markdown instead of a proprietary format, your notes remain portable and can be edited with many other Markdown editors.
SourceBluedot: What happens to my recordings if I cancel?
Access ends at cancellation and recordings are permanently deleted after thirty days. Export anything you need to keep before you cancel.
Obsidian: Can I collaborate with others in Obsidian?
The core application does not include built-in team collaboration features. However, Obsidian offers optional add-ons and can be used with version control systems or cloud storage for collaboration.
SourceBluedot: Can I record video, not just audio?
Only from the Pro tier. Basic is audio only and limits each recording to one hour.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bluedot vs Supernormal
- Bluedot vs MeetGeek
- Bluedot vs Bear Notes
- Bluedot vs Capacities
- Bluedot vs Microsoft OneNote
- Bluedot vs Granola
- Bluedot vs Google Slides
- Bluedot vs Mimestream
- Bluedot vs Circleback
- Bluedot vs Rows
- Bluedot vs Bear
- Bluedot vs RemNote
- Bluedot vs Structured
- Bluedot vs Tana
- Bluedot vs Time Doctor
- Bluedot vs Roam Research
- Bluedot vs Elicit
- Bluedot vs Mendeley
- Bluedot vs NVivo
- Bluedot vs Paperpile
- Bluedot vs Zotero
- Bluedot vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Bluedot vs SurveyMonkey
- Bluedot vs Aurelius
- Bluedot vs Benchling
- Bluedot vs LabVantage
- Bluedot vs Sapio Sciences
- Bluedot vs Castor EDC
- Bluedot vs Chemaxon
- Bluedot vs Condens
- Bluedot vs DNAnexus
- Bluedot vs Dotmatics
- Obsidian vs Supernormal
- Obsidian vs MeetGeek
- Obsidian vs Bear Notes
- Obsidian vs Capacities
- Obsidian vs Microsoft OneNote
- Obsidian vs Granola
- Obsidian vs Google Slides
- Obsidian vs Mimestream
- Obsidian vs Circleback
- Obsidian vs Rows
- Obsidian vs Bear
- Obsidian vs RemNote
- Obsidian vs Structured
- Obsidian vs Tana
- Obsidian vs Time Doctor
- Obsidian vs Roam Research
- Obsidian vs Elicit
- Obsidian vs Mendeley
- Obsidian vs NVivo
- Obsidian vs Paperpile
- Obsidian vs Zotero
- Obsidian vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Obsidian vs SurveyMonkey
- Obsidian vs Aurelius
- Obsidian vs Benchling
- Obsidian vs LabVantage
- Obsidian vs Sapio Sciences
- Obsidian vs Castor EDC
- Obsidian vs Chemaxon
- Obsidian vs Condens
- Obsidian vs DNAnexus
- Obsidian vs Dotmatics
