Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Rollup

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Rollup
Web Development
JavaScript module bundler built for libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Rollup slower than the Go and Rust bundlers that followed it, since it is written in JavaScript
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Rollup covers Tree shaking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Rollup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Rollup |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Rollup
- Tree shaking
- Clean output
- Multiple output formats
- Plugin API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Rollup
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Rollup
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Rollup
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Rollup
Rollup
- Publishing a JavaScript library in several module formatsnot Blacksmith
- Builds where output size and cleanliness matter more than build speednot Blacksmith
- Producing ES module output for consumers who will bundle it themselvesnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Rollup
- Slower than the Go and Rust bundlers that followed it, since it is written in JavaScript
- Application concerns like dev servers and hot reloading are not its job, so app builds need Vite on top
- Configuration for non-trivial applications gets verbose compared with tools that assume more
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Rollup
Free- RollupFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Rollup if
- You need tree shaking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want clean output.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Rollup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Rollup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Rollup?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Rollup at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Rollup run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Rollup runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Rollup is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Rollup cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Rollup covers Tree shaking, Clean output, Multiple output formats, Plugin API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceRollup: Is Rollup free?
Yes, open source under the MIT licence.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceRollup: Rollup or webpack?
Rollup is the usual choice for libraries thanks to cleaner output and better tree shaking. webpack remains stronger for complex applications with heavy asset handling.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceRollup: Do I need Rollup if I use Vite?
Not directly. Vite uses Rollup for production builds, so you already benefit from it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs esbuild
- Blacksmith vs Turbopack
- Blacksmith vs MySQL
- Blacksmith vs Docusaurus
- Blacksmith vs MUI
- Blacksmith vs Bootstrap
- Blacksmith vs Radix UI
- Blacksmith vs shadcn/ui
- Blacksmith vs Chakra UI
- Blacksmith vs Apache HTTP Server
- Blacksmith vs Drupal
- Blacksmith vs Lit
- Blacksmith vs NestJS
- Blacksmith vs Nuxt
- Blacksmith vs PHP
- Blacksmith vs Preact
- Blacksmith vs Qwik
- Blacksmith vs Ruby on Rails
- Rollup vs WarpBuild
- Rollup vs Depot
- Rollup vs Namespace
- Rollup vs Earthly
- Rollup vs Nx Cloud
- Rollup vs OpsLevel
- Rollup vs Garden
- Rollup vs ConfigCat
- Rollup vs Dagger
- Rollup vs Nix
- Rollup vs Rust
- Rollup vs Ansible
- Rollup vs PartyKit
- Rollup vs PhpStorm
- Rollup vs Pieces for Developers
- Rollup vs RAD Studio
- Rollup vs Refact
- Rollup vs esbuild
- Rollup vs Turbopack
- Rollup vs MySQL
- Rollup vs Docusaurus
- Rollup vs MUI
- Rollup vs Bootstrap
- Rollup vs Radix UI
- Rollup vs shadcn/ui
- Rollup vs Chakra UI
- Rollup vs Apache HTTP Server
- Rollup vs Drupal
- Rollup vs Lit
- Rollup vs NestJS
- Rollup vs Nuxt
- Rollup vs PHP
- Rollup vs Preact
- Rollup vs Qwik
- Rollup vs Ruby on Rails
