Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Microsoft Outlook
Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Microsoft Outlook
Technology
Microsoft's email and calendar client, in the middle of a transition from the classic Windows application to a web-based replacement.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Microsoft Outlook microsoft is replacing the classic Win32 client with the new web-based Outlook, and the new one runs only web add-ins, not COM add-ins, so any line-of-business integration for CRM, dictation, document management or telephony must be rewritten or the desktop stays on classic until its support window closes.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Microsoft Outlook covers Exchange calendar integration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Microsoft Outlook actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Microsoft Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Technology |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Microsoft Outlook
- Exchange calendar integration
- Delegate access
- Shared mailboxes
- Rules and Quick Steps
- Retention, hold and eDiscovery
- Sensitivity labels and encryption
- Add-in platform
- Offline cached mode
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Microsoft Outlook
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Microsoft Outlook
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Microsoft Outlook
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Microsoft Outlook
Microsoft Outlook
- Organisations on Exchange Online or Exchange Server where free/busy scheduling and room booking across everyone is a daily requirementnot Blacksmith
- Executive assistants managing someone else's calendar and mailbox through delegate access, which no IMAP client supports properlynot Blacksmith
- Regulated environments that need retention policies, legal hold and eDiscovery applied to mail centrally rather than per usernot Blacksmith
- Teams handling shared inboxes such as support or accounts, where permissions and tracking matter more than the mail client itselfnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Microsoft Outlook
- Microsoft is replacing the classic Win32 client with the new web-based Outlook, and the new one runs only web add-ins, not COM add-ins, so any line-of-business integration for CRM, dictation, document management or telephony must be rewritten or the desktop stays on classic until its support window closes.
- The new client's handling of non-Microsoft accounts synchronises mail through Microsoft's cloud rather than connecting from the machine to the provider, which several organisations' data residency and handling policies do not allow, and it is not an optional behaviour.
- PST and OST files are a single-file, corruptible and effectively unshareable store, and the new client's reduced PST support means years of personal archives sitting in those files need an explicit migration plan rather than carrying forward.
- Large mailboxes turn software problems into administration ones: search index rebuilds, OST files of tens of gigabytes and the mailbox quotas of whichever plan was bought, and the usual fix is archiving policy rather than anything a user can do.
- Against IMAP or Gmail you lose most of what justifies it, including free/busy lookup, room booking, delegate access, and retention and compliance policies, because those are Exchange server features rather than client features.
- The five or six products sharing the Outlook name have materially different feature sets, so internal documentation, training and support procedures must be written per platform and a user moving between desktop, web and mobile finds the same task done differently in each.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Microsoft Outlook
Free- Outlook (Free)Free
- 15 GB mailbox storage
- 5 GB cloud storage
- Web and mobile Office app access
- Microsoft 365 Basic$1.99/month
- 100 GB mailbox storage
- 100 GB cloud storage
- Ad-free experience
- Microsoft 365 Personal$9.99/month
- 1 TB cloud storage
- Desktop Office apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, OneNote)
- Copilot with high usage limits
- Microsoft 365 Family$12.99/month
- 1-6 users
- Up to 6 TB total cloud storage (1 TB per person)
- Same apps and features as Personal
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Microsoft Outlook if
- You need exchange calendar integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want delegate access.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Microsoft Outlook better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Microsoft Outlook at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Microsoft Outlook?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Microsoft Outlook at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Microsoft Outlook run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Microsoft Outlook runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Microsoft Outlook is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Microsoft Outlook cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Microsoft Outlook covers Exchange calendar integration, Delegate access, Shared mailboxes, Rules and Quick Steps.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: What is the difference between classic Outlook and the new Outlook for Windows?
Classic is the long-standing Win32 application shipped with Microsoft 365 and Office LTSC. The new Outlook is a web-based client that replaced Windows Mail and Calendar. The most consequential difference is add-ins: the new client supports only web add-ins, not COM add-ins.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: How long will classic Outlook be supported?
Microsoft has stated support through at least 2029. That is a planning window rather than a reprieve, and organisations with COM add-in dependencies should be scoping the replacement work now.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: Can I use Outlook with Gmail or another IMAP provider?
Yes, but with reduced capability. You lose free/busy lookup, room booking, delegate access and server-side compliance policies, because those come from Exchange rather than from the client.
Microsoft Outlook: Is Outlook free?
Outlook on the web and the mobile apps are free with a Microsoft account, and the new Outlook for Windows is included with Windows 11. The classic desktop application requires a Microsoft 365 subscription or an Office perpetual licence.
Microsoft Outlook: Will my COM add-ins work in the new Outlook?
No. The new client supports only the cross-platform web add-in model. Vendors must publish a web add-in, and where they have not, the choice is to stay on classic Outlook or replace the integration.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Outlook
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Safari
- Blacksmith vs Google Chrome
- Blacksmith vs Mozilla Firefox
- Blacksmith vs Thought Machine
- Blacksmith vs Sentry
- Blacksmith vs Apache Spark
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Desktop
- Blacksmith vs MongoDB
- Blacksmith vs Asana
- Blacksmith vs Figma
- Blacksmith vs Greenhouse
- Blacksmith vs Monday.com
- Blacksmith vs Maze
- Blacksmith vs PagerDuty
- Blacksmith vs PyCharm
- Blacksmith vs Sketch
- Blacksmith vs Sublime Text
- Microsoft Outlook vs WarpBuild
- Microsoft Outlook vs Depot
- Microsoft Outlook vs Namespace
- Microsoft Outlook vs Earthly
- Microsoft Outlook vs Nx Cloud
- Microsoft Outlook vs OpsLevel
- Microsoft Outlook vs Garden
- Microsoft Outlook vs ConfigCat
- Microsoft Outlook vs Dagger
- Microsoft Outlook vs Nix
- Microsoft Outlook vs Rust
- Microsoft Outlook vs Ansible
- Microsoft Outlook vs PartyKit
- Microsoft Outlook vs PhpStorm
- Microsoft Outlook vs Pieces for Developers
- Microsoft Outlook vs RAD Studio
- Microsoft Outlook vs Refact
- Microsoft Outlook vs Safari
- Microsoft Outlook vs Google Chrome
- Microsoft Outlook vs Mozilla Firefox
- Microsoft Outlook vs Thought Machine
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sentry
- Microsoft Outlook vs Apache Spark
- Microsoft Outlook vs GitHub Desktop
- Microsoft Outlook vs MongoDB
- Microsoft Outlook vs Asana
- Microsoft Outlook vs Figma
- Microsoft Outlook vs Greenhouse
- Microsoft Outlook vs Monday.com
- Microsoft Outlook vs Maze
- Microsoft Outlook vs PagerDuty
- Microsoft Outlook vs PyCharm
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sketch
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sublime Text