Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs GitHub Desktop

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

GitHub Desktop
Technology
A free, open source Git client from GitHub for Windows and macOS that covers common workflows rather than all of Git.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; GitHub Desktop there is no official Linux build; the application ships for Windows and macOS only, and the community fork at shiftkey/desktop that packages it for Linux is maintained separately and lags official releases, so a mixed-OS team cannot standardise on one client.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, GitHub Desktop covers Line-level staging.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and GitHub Desktop actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | GitHub Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | free |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Windows, Macos |
| Category | Developer Tools | Technology |
| Founded | Unknown | 2008 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in GitHub Desktop
- Line-level staging
- Branch and merge UI
- Pull request integration
- Enterprise authentication
- Squash and reorder
- Drag cherry-pick
- Co-author attribution
- Editor and shell handoff
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot GitHub Desktop
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot GitHub Desktop
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot GitHub Desktop
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop
- Onboarding designers or technical writers who need to commit to a docs or assets repository without learning the command linenot Blacksmith
- A new engineer's first weeks, where seeing the diff and the branch state visually prevents the common early mistakesnot Blacksmith
- Reviewing a colleague's pull request branch locally with a readable diff before approving itnot Blacksmith
- Small teams standardised entirely on GitHub who want SSO-backed authentication to work without managing personal access tokens by handnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
GitHub Desktop
- There is no official Linux build; the application ships for Windows and macOS only, and the community fork at shiftkey/desktop that packages it for Linux is maintained separately and lags official releases, so a mixed-OS team cannot standardise on one client.
- Submodules are effectively unsupported: the app shows a submodule change as an opaque single line and gives you no way to initialise, update or navigate into it, so any repository using them needs the terminal anyway.
- History rewriting is limited to squashing and reordering local commits by drag and drop; interactive rebase, fixup chains, editing an old commit's contents and bisect are all absent, which is exactly the set of operations a beginner needs help with most.
- Pull request features only exist for GitHub remotes, so a team on GitLab or Bitbucket gets a plain Git client with an empty pull request pane and no review or checks view at all.
- Commit signing with a key that requires a passphrase generally fails, because the app cannot surface the pinentry prompt, and the resulting error message does not say that is the cause.
- GitHub staffs it lightly compared with its web and CI products, so long-standing feature requests and bugs sit open for years; if you file an issue you should plan around it rather than expect a fix.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
GitHub Desktop
Free- FreeFree
- Git repository management
- GitHub integration
- Visual diff tools
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose GitHub Desktop if
- You need line-level staging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos.
- You also want branch and merge ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or GitHub Desktop better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and GitHub Desktop at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or GitHub Desktop?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and GitHub Desktop at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or GitHub Desktop run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. GitHub Desktop runs on Windows, Macos.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what GitHub Desktop is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that GitHub Desktop cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. GitHub Desktop covers Line-level staging, Branch and merge UI, Pull request integration, Enterprise authentication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceGitHub Desktop: Is there a Linux version?
Not an official one. GitHub ships Windows and macOS builds only. A community fork, shiftkey/desktop, produces Linux packages, but it is maintained by volunteers and trails the official releases.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceGitHub Desktop: Does it work with GitLab or Bitbucket?
For plain Git operations, yes: you can clone, commit, push and pull against any remote. The pull request, review and checks features only work against GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceGitHub Desktop: What does it cost?
Nothing. It is free and the source is published under the MIT licence, and it is separate from any GitHub plan you may or may not pay for.
GitHub Desktop: Will it handle submodules?
No. Submodule changes appear as an unreadable single-line diff and there are no controls for initialising or updating them. Repositories that use submodules need the command line.
GitHub Desktop: Do I still need to learn Git?
For everyday work, no. For recovery, yes. Anything beyond the curated set of operations, including interactive rebase and reflog recovery, happens in the terminal, so a team using it should have at least one person who knows Git properly.
GitHub Desktop: Does it work with GitHub Enterprise Server?
Yes. It signs in to GitHub Enterprise Server and GitHub Enterprise Cloud as well as GitHub.com, and it honours organisations that enforce SAML single sign-on.
Related pages
More on GitHub Desktop
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Asana
- Blacksmith vs ClickUp
- Blacksmith vs Figma
- Blacksmith vs Linear
- Blacksmith vs Monday.com
- Blacksmith vs Dropbox
- Blacksmith vs Excalidraw
- Blacksmith vs Notion
- Blacksmith vs GitLab
- Blacksmith vs Coda
- Blacksmith vs Postman
- Blacksmith vs Whimsical
- Blacksmith vs Shortcut
- Blacksmith vs Site24x7
- Blacksmith vs StatusCake
- Blacksmith vs Storybook
- Blacksmith vs WebStorm
- Blacksmith vs Zabbix Cloud
- GitHub Desktop vs WarpBuild
- GitHub Desktop vs Depot
- GitHub Desktop vs Namespace
- GitHub Desktop vs Earthly
- GitHub Desktop vs Nx Cloud
- GitHub Desktop vs OpsLevel
- GitHub Desktop vs Garden
- GitHub Desktop vs ConfigCat
- GitHub Desktop vs Dagger
- GitHub Desktop vs Nix
- GitHub Desktop vs Rust
- GitHub Desktop vs Ansible
- GitHub Desktop vs PartyKit
- GitHub Desktop vs PhpStorm
- GitHub Desktop vs Pieces for Developers
- GitHub Desktop vs RAD Studio
- GitHub Desktop vs Refact
- GitHub Desktop vs Asana
- GitHub Desktop vs ClickUp
- GitHub Desktop vs Figma
- GitHub Desktop vs Linear
- GitHub Desktop vs Monday.com
- GitHub Desktop vs Dropbox
- GitHub Desktop vs Excalidraw
- GitHub Desktop vs Notion
- GitHub Desktop vs GitLab
- GitHub Desktop vs Coda
- GitHub Desktop vs Postman
- GitHub Desktop vs Whimsical
- GitHub Desktop vs Shortcut
- GitHub Desktop vs Site24x7
- GitHub Desktop vs StatusCake
- GitHub Desktop vs Storybook
- GitHub Desktop vs WebStorm
- GitHub Desktop vs Zabbix Cloud
