Cybersecurity · head to head
Beyond Identity vs Helix

Beyond Identity
Cybersecurity
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Helix
Developer Tools
Post-modern modal text editor for the terminal, written in Rust
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Helix has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Beyond Identity it is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.; Helix no official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.
- They diverge on capability: Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Helix covers Multiple Selections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beyond Identity and Helix actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beyond Identity | Helix |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | linux, mac, windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beyond Identity
- Device-bound credentials
- Continuous device posture
- No shared secrets
- Identity provider integration
- Secure developer signing
- Administrator policy engine
Only in Helix
- Multiple Selections
- Tree-sitter Syntax Trees
- Built-in LSP Support
- Fuzzy File Finder
- Project-wide Search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beyond Identity
- An organisation that suffered a breach through MFA push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineerednot Helix
- A software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patchesnot Helix
- A firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systemsnot Helix
- A security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on topnot Helix
Helix
- Editing code over SSH or in tmux sessionsnot Beyond Identity
- Working with syntax-aware selection and navigationnot Beyond Identity
- Getting IDE-like completion and diagnostics without plugin setupnot Beyond Identity
- Lightweight, low-resource code editing on laptopsnot Beyond Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beyond Identity
- It is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- Every device that authenticates needs the platform authenticator installed, which makes onboarding contractors, third parties and shared kiosks awkward and sometimes impossible.
- Pricing is quoted per user with no published rates, so buyers cannot benchmark it against the increasingly capable passkey support now included in identity provider base licences.
- Losing all enrolled devices requires an administrative recovery path, and organisations that design that path poorly reintroduce a social-engineering target at the helpdesk.
- Legacy applications that only speak passwords or older protocols need a federation shim or stay outside the policy, so coverage is rarely complete in an estate with old systems.
Helix
- No official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.
- Plugin ecosystem is far smaller than Vim's or Neovim's, limiting customization.
- Keybindings differ from both Vim and Kakoune, adding a learning curve for users of either.
- Configuration is more limited than Neovim's Lua-based extensibility.
Pricing, plan by plan
Beyond Identity
On request- Secure Access Platform$undefined/year
- Per-user annual subscription quoted by seat count
- Deployed alongside an existing identity provider rather than replacing it
- Device posture integrations with major EDR and MDM vendors included
Helix
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor, no paid tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Beyond Identity if
- You need device-bound credentials.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want continuous device posture.
Choose Helix if
- You need multiple selections.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on linux, mac, windows.
- You also want tree-sitter syntax trees.
Questions people ask
- Is Beyond Identity or Helix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beyond Identity starts at On request and Helix at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beyond Identity or Helix?
- Helix has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Beyond Identity and Free for Helix.
- Does Beyond Identity or Helix run on more platforms?
- Beyond Identity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. Helix runs on linux, mac, windows.
- Can I use Helix for free?
- Yes. Helix has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Beyond Identity starts at On request.
- What is Beyond Identity best used for?
- Beyond Identity is most often used for an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered, a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches, a firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systems, a security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on top. Of those, an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered and a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches are not what Helix is typically brought in for.
- What can Beyond Identity do that Helix cannot?
- Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Continuous device posture, No shared secrets, Identity provider integration. Helix covers Multiple Selections, Tree-sitter Syntax Trees, Built-in LSP Support, Fuzzy File Finder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beyond Identity: Does it replace Okta or Entra ID?
No. It sits in front of them as the authentication method. Budget for both.
Helix: Is Helix free to use?
Yes, Helix is free and open source, licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL-2.0), with no paid tiers or subscriptions.
SourceBeyond Identity: What happens when a user loses their laptop?
They authenticate from another enrolled device, or go through an administrative recovery flow. Designing that recovery well matters, because it is the weakest point.
Helix: How do I install Helix?
Install via your operating system's package manager, or download pre-built binaries from GitHub Releases; the nightly version requires building from source.
SourceBeyond Identity: Is it different from passkeys?
The credential mechanism is similar in spirit. The difference is enforcing device security posture at every authentication, which standard passkeys do not do.
Helix: Does Helix support plugins?
Not yet. Helix currently has no plugin system, though the project intends to add one eventually; it instead ships with built-in LSP and tree-sitter support out of the box.
SourceHelix: How do I configure Helix?
Helix ships with sane modern defaults requiring much less config-file fiddling than Vim, though settings can still be customized in a config.toml file.
SourceHelix: Where can I get help or support?
Support is community-driven via GitHub for code and issues, the Matrix chat for discussion, and OpenCollective for funding ongoing development.
SourceRelated pages
More on Beyond Identity
Other head to heads
- Beyond Identity vs 1Password
- Beyond Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Beyond Identity vs Transmit Security
- Beyond Identity vs Teleport
- Beyond Identity vs Authelia
- Beyond Identity vs authentik
- Beyond Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Beyond Identity vs Clerk
- Beyond Identity vs Frontegg
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Beyond Identity vs Logto
- Beyond Identity vs Ory
- Beyond Identity vs WorkOS
- Beyond Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Beyond Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Beyond Identity vs Osano
- Beyond Identity vs Proton Mail
- Beyond Identity vs Veriff
- Beyond Identity vs Notepad++
- Beyond Identity vs GNU Emacs
- Beyond Identity vs Penpot
- Beyond Identity vs Ansible
- Beyond Identity vs Frappe
- Beyond Identity vs Restate
- Beyond Identity vs Visual Studio Code
- Beyond Identity vs Rust
- Beyond Identity vs Bazel
- Beyond Identity vs Eclipse IDE
- Beyond Identity vs Pants Build
- Beyond Identity vs Jitsu
- Beyond Identity vs Prettier
- Beyond Identity vs StackBlitz
- Beyond Identity vs Steampipe
- Beyond Identity vs Tilt
- Beyond Identity vs WarpBuild
- Helix vs 1Password
- Helix vs Cisco Duo
- Helix vs Transmit Security
- Helix vs Teleport
- Helix vs Authelia
- Helix vs authentik
- Helix vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Helix vs Clerk
- Helix vs Frontegg
- Helix vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Helix vs Logto
- Helix vs Ory
- Helix vs WorkOS
- Helix vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Helix vs Milestone XProtect
- Helix vs Osano
- Helix vs Proton Mail
- Helix vs Veriff
- Helix vs Notepad++
- Helix vs GNU Emacs
- Helix vs Penpot
- Helix vs Ansible
- Helix vs Frappe
- Helix vs Restate
- Helix vs Visual Studio Code
- Helix vs Rust
- Helix vs Bazel
- Helix vs Eclipse IDE
- Helix vs Pants Build
- Helix vs Jitsu
- Helix vs Prettier
- Helix vs StackBlitz
- Helix vs Steampipe
- Helix vs Tilt
- Helix vs WarpBuild
