Backup · head to head
Bacula Enterprise vs Portworx Backup

Portworx Backup
Backup
Kubernetes application backup with a free tier up to one terabyte
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Portworx Backup has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bacula Enterprise pricing is not published; the vendor asks for a request rather than listing rates; Portworx Backup the paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- They diverge on capability: Bacula Enterprise covers Modular architecture, Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bacula Enterprise and Portworx Backup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bacula Enterprise | Portworx Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $500/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per node hour |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | Web, Linux |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bacula Enterprise
- Modular architecture
- Plugin framework
- Deduplication
- Cloud storage
- Encryption
- Automated recovery testing
- VMware
- Hyper-V
Only in Portworx Backup
- Application-level backup
- Any CSI provider
- Cross-cluster restore
- Namespace and label selection
- Scheduled policies
- Role-based access
- Free tier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bacula Enterprise
- Enterprise backup across virtual machines, databases and containersnot Portworx Backup
- Multi-cloud and hybrid backup from one systemnot Portworx Backup
- Backup where licensing by data volume would be prohibitive, since Bacula does not charge by capacitynot Portworx Backup
- Long-retention archival for regulated environmentsnot Portworx Backup
Portworx Backup
- A platform team running Velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failuresnot Bacula Enterprise
- Protecting Kubernetes applications across EKS, GKE and on premises clusters under one policy setnot Bacula Enterprise
- Restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery testnot Bacula Enterprise
- A small team that wants real Kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budgetnot Bacula Enterprise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bacula Enterprise
- Pricing is not published; the vendor asks for a request rather than listing rates
- The differences between Enterprise and the open source Community edition are not set out on the product pages, so what the licence buys is unclear until you talk to sales
- Aimed at data centre and enterprise environments rather than small deployments
Portworx Backup
- The paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- It is licensed separately from Portworx Enterprise, so organisations that assumed storage and backup came together find a second subscription in the quote.
- The free tier caps at one terabyte of protected data, which is quickly exceeded by any database of consequence and forces a jump straight to the minimum commitment.
- Backup targets are object stores you provide, so restore egress charges from your cloud provider are outside the vendor price and appear during a recovery rather than in procurement.
- Application-consistent backup of databases still depends on correct pre and post hooks, so the product does not remove the requirement to understand and rehearse your own restore ordering.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bacula Enterprise
$500/year- Bacula Enterprise$500/year
- Unlimited data
- Plugin support
- Enterprise support
Portworx Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Up to one terabyte of protected data
- No feature restrictions
- Fully managed service
- Portworx Backup$0.2/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Unlimited protected capacity
- Any Container Storage Interface provider
Which should you pick?
Choose Bacula Enterprise if
- You need modular architecture.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want plugin framework.
Choose Portworx Backup if
- You need application-level backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want any csi provider.
Questions people ask
- Is Bacula Enterprise or Portworx Backup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bacula Enterprise starts at $500/year and Portworx Backup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bacula Enterprise or Portworx Backup?
- Portworx Backup has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $500/year for Bacula Enterprise and Free for Portworx Backup.
- Does Bacula Enterprise or Portworx Backup run on more platforms?
- Bacula Enterprise runs on Windows, Linux, Web. Portworx Backup runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Portworx Backup for free?
- Yes. Portworx Backup has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bacula Enterprise starts at $500/year.
- What is Bacula Enterprise best used for?
- Bacula Enterprise is most often used for enterprise backup across virtual machines, databases and containers, multi-cloud and hybrid backup from one system, backup where licensing by data volume would be prohibitive, since bacula does not charge by capacity, long-retention archival for regulated environments. Of those, enterprise backup across virtual machines, databases and containers and multi-cloud and hybrid backup from one system are not what Portworx Backup is typically brought in for.
- What can Bacula Enterprise do that Portworx Backup cannot?
- Bacula Enterprise covers Modular architecture, Plugin framework, Deduplication, Cloud storage. Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Any CSI provider, Cross-cluster restore, Namespace and label selection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bacula Enterprise: Does Bacula Enterprise offer a trial?
Yes. Bacula offers a trial that provides 'a streamlined version of Bacula Enterprise' with 'rapid access to an online, hosted environment'. However, no specific trial period duration is stated on the page.
SourcePortworx Backup: Is the free tier real?
Yes, up to one terabyte of protected data with no feature restrictions as a managed service. It is a usable production tier for small footprints, not a trial.
Bacula Enterprise: Is there a free trial available, or does it require contacting sales?
The trial is available directly online without needing to contact sales first. The page provides streamlined access to test the service with Global Endpoint Deduplication and cloud storage capabilities.
SourcePortworx Backup: Does it only protect Portworx volumes?
No. It works across Container Storage Interface providers, including cloud provider storage and other vendors' drivers.
Bacula Enterprise: Does Bacula charge by data volume?
No. One customer testimonial states 'we are not charged by data volume or hardware', indicating that Bacula does not use capacity-based pricing like some competitors.
SourcePortworx Backup: Is it included with Portworx Enterprise?
No. It is a separate licence at 0.20 USD per node hour with its own minimum.
Bacula Enterprise: How can I get Bacula pricing information?
Bacula directs interested parties to Request Pricing through their contact page rather than displaying rates publicly.
SourceRelated pages
More on Bacula Enterprise
More on Portworx Backup
Other head to heads
- Bacula Enterprise vs CloudAlly
- Bacula Enterprise vs Backupify
- Bacula Enterprise vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Bacula Enterprise vs Spanning Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Amanda Enterprise
- Bacula Enterprise vs Velero
- Bacula Enterprise vs Clonezilla
- Bacula Enterprise vs UrBackup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Bacula Enterprise vs Borg Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs OwnBackup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Arcserve UDP
- Bacula Enterprise vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Bacula Enterprise vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Bacula Enterprise vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Redstor
- Bacula Enterprise vs rustic
- Bacula Enterprise vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Bacula Enterprise vs Trilio
- Bacula Enterprise vs HYCU
- Bacula Enterprise vs BDRShield
- Bacula Enterprise vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Bacula Enterprise vs CloudCasa
- Bacula Enterprise vs Kopia
- Bacula Enterprise vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Datto Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs HPE StoreOnce
- Bacula Enterprise vs MSP360 Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs N-able Backup
- Portworx Backup vs CloudAlly
- Portworx Backup vs Backupify
- Portworx Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Amanda Enterprise
- Portworx Backup vs Velero
- Portworx Backup vs Clonezilla
- Portworx Backup vs UrBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Portworx Backup vs Borg Backup
- Portworx Backup vs OwnBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Arcserve UDP
- Portworx Backup vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx Backup vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Redstor
- Portworx Backup vs rustic
- Portworx Backup vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Portworx Backup vs Trilio
- Portworx Backup vs HYCU
- Portworx Backup vs BDRShield
- Portworx Backup vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx Backup vs CloudCasa
- Portworx Backup vs Kopia
- Portworx Backup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Datto Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx Backup vs N-able Backup

