APIs · head to head
Backendless vs Paw

Backendless
APIs
Visual app development platform with REST APIs and cloud backend
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Paw
APIs
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing
- From
- $99/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Backendless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Backendless free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables; Paw no specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- They diverge on capability: Backendless covers REST API, Paw covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backendless and Paw actually diverge.
| Attribute | Backendless | Paw |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $99/one-time |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Visual builder | MacOS |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backendless
- REST API
- Real-time database
- Cloud code
- Custom integrations
- Webhooks
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Visual builder support
Only in Paw
- REST Client
- Scripting
- Dynamic Values
- Slack
- GitHub
- Custom extensions
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backendless
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Paw
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Both are used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation, microservices, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backendless
- Free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- Smaller community and integration ecosystem compared to Firebase or AWS
- Customization beyond codeless tools requires developer expertise
- Limited documentation for advanced use cases and edge cases
Paw
- No specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- Individual and volume licensing requires direct contact
- Limited details on team subscription pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Backendless
Free- FreeFree
- 50 API requests/minute
- 20 database tables
- 1 GB file storage
- Scale Variable$15/month
- Unlimited API requests/month
- 100 database tables
- 10 GB file storage
- Scale Fixed$15/month
- Same as Scale Variable
- Fixed monthly pricing
Paw
$99/one-time- Standard$99/one-time
- Full REST client
- Advanced scripting
- Extensions
- Annual License$49/yearly
- All features
- Updates
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Backendless if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Visual builder.
- You also want real-time database.
Questions people ask
- Is Backendless or Paw better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backendless starts at Free and Paw at $99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backendless or Paw?
- Backendless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Backendless and $99/one-time for Paw.
- Does Backendless or Paw run on more platforms?
- Backendless runs on Cloud, Visual builder. Paw runs on MacOS.
- Can I use Backendless for free?
- Yes. Backendless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paw starts at $99/one-time.
- What is Backendless best used for?
- Backendless is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation.
- What can Backendless do that Paw cannot?
- Backendless covers REST API, Real-time database, Cloud code, Custom integrations. Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backendless: Does Backendless have a free tier?
Backendless Free plan ($0/month) includes 50 API requests per minute, 20 database tables, 1 GB file storage, 1 visualization, 2 security roles, and basic cloud code capabilities.
SourcePaw: How much does RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) cost?
Paw offers a free tier for personal and professional use. Paid subscription plans are available on monthly and yearly billing, but specific pricing amounts are not disclosed and require direct contact with RapidAPI.
SourceBackendless: What features does the Scale plan include?
Scale plan ($15+/month) provides unlimited API requests per month, 100 database tables, 10 GB file storage, 5 visualizations, 10 custom API keys, daily backups, free SSL certificates, and 1,000 real-time connections.
SourcePaw: Is there a free version of Paw?
Yes, RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) is free for both personal and professional use.
SourceBackendless: Can I add more storage or increase API limits?
Yes, Backendless offers Function Packs ranging from $5-$399/month to increase specific limits such as storage, API requests, or security features.
SourcePaw: What features are included in the free version of Paw?
The free tier includes HTTP client capabilities for API testing, API documentation, personal sync across devices, and support for Swagger, RAML, and API Blueprint formats.
SourceBackendless: Does Backendless support offline functionality?
Backendless supports real-time sync and offline capabilities for mobile apps, allowing data to sync when connectivity is restored.
SourcePaw: What additional features do Paw team subscriptions include?
Team subscription plans include all personal features plus collaborative tools, team project access, synchronized workflows with safe data merges, and real-time notifications and updates.
SourceBackendless: Is Backendless Pro available for self-hosting?
Yes, Backendless Pro Community Edition is available under free licensing for core functionality. Managed Backendless is a paid option for self-hosted deployments with request-based pricing.
SourceBackendless: What are Backendless's integration limitations?
While Backendless supports many integrations, it has a smaller integration library compared to competitors. Finding solutions to edge cases or complex setups may require more development effort.
SourceRelated pages
More on Backendless
Other head to heads
- Backendless vs PocketBase
- Backendless vs Appwrite
- Backendless vs Hasura
- Backendless vs Parse Server
- Backendless vs Thunder Client
- Backendless vs Janus Gateway
- Backendless vs Marqeta
- Backendless vs i2c
- Backendless vs Strapi
- Backendless vs Sanity
- Backendless vs Increase
- Backendless vs Flybits
- Backendless vs Sensedia
- Backendless vs Sila
- Backendless vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Backendless vs Swagger
- Backendless vs TIBCO Mashery
- Backendless vs Zeplo
- Backendless vs Apidog
- Backendless vs REST Client VSCode
- Backendless vs Hoppscotch
- Backendless vs HTTPie
- Backendless vs Griffin
- Backendless vs KeystoneJS
- Backendless vs Basis Theory
- Backendless vs Astra
- Backendless vs Asyncapi
- Backendless vs AWS API Gateway
- Backendless vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paw vs PocketBase
- Paw vs Appwrite
- Paw vs Hasura
- Paw vs Parse Server
- Paw vs Thunder Client
- Paw vs Janus Gateway
- Paw vs Marqeta
- Paw vs i2c
- Paw vs Strapi
- Paw vs Sanity
- Paw vs Increase
- Paw vs Flybits
- Paw vs Sensedia
- Paw vs Sila
- Paw vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Paw vs Swagger
- Paw vs TIBCO Mashery
- Paw vs Zeplo
- Paw vs Apidog
- Paw vs REST Client VSCode
- Paw vs Hoppscotch
- Paw vs HTTPie
- Paw vs Griffin
- Paw vs KeystoneJS
- Paw vs Basis Theory
- Paw vs Astra
- Paw vs Asyncapi
- Paw vs AWS API Gateway
- Paw vs Microsoft Azure API Management
