Softwr

Software · head to head

Azure Monitor vs Vector

Azure Monitor logo

Azure Monitor

Software

Azure's Monitoring and Diagnostics Service

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Vector logo

Vector

Software

A Lightweight and Ultra-Fast Tool for Building Observability Pipelines

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Vector free and open source under the MPL-2.0 license, backed by an open source community with a public GitHub repo
  • They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Alerts and notifications, Vector covers Trace collection.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Vector actually diverge.

Attributes where Azure Monitor and Vector differ
AttributeAzure MonitorVector
Pricing modelusage-basedopen-source
Founded20102019

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Azure Monitor

  • Alerts and notifications
  • Custom dashboards

Only in Vector

  • Trace collection
  • Event transformation

Both cover

  • Log collection
  • Metrics collection
  • API
  • Webhooks
  • REST
  • Web support
  • Api support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Azure Monitor

  • Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Vector
  • Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Vector
  • Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Vector
  • Long-term log retention for compliancenot Vector
  • Querying operational data with KQLnot Vector

Vector

  • Log monitoringnot Azure Monitor
  • Application performancenot Azure Monitor
  • Security analyticsnot Azure Monitor
  • Troubleshootingnot Azure Monitor

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Azure Monitor

  • Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
  • Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
  • Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
  • Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
  • Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
  • The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen

Vector

  • Free and open source under the MPL-2.0 license, backed by an open source community with a public GitHub repo

Pricing, plan by plan

Azure Monitor

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Log collection
    • Metrics collection
    • Alerts and notifications

Vector

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Log collection
    • Metrics collection
    • Trace collection

Which should you pick?

Choose Azure Monitor if

  • You need alerts and notifications.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want custom dashboards.
Azure Monitor review

Choose Vector if

  • You need trace collection.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want event transformation.
Vector review

Questions people ask

Is Azure Monitor or Vector better?
Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Vector at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Vector?
Azure Monitor starts at Free and Vector at Free.
Does Azure Monitor or Vector run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Azure Monitor best used for?
Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Vector is typically brought in for.
What can Azure Monitor do that Vector cannot?
Azure Monitor covers Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Vector covers Trace collection, Event transformation. Both handle Log collection, Metrics collection, API, Webhooks.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Azure Monitor

More on Vector

Keep looking

Other head to heads