Manufacturing · head to head
AVEVA System Platform vs Canary Labs

AVEVA System Platform
Manufacturing
Supervisory HMI and SCADA platform, formerly sold as Wonderware System Platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Canary Labs
Databases
Industrial process historian with published per-tag pricing and no client licence fees
- From
- $3000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AVEVA System Platform wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.; Canary Labs pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.
- They diverge on capability: AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AVEVA System Platform and Canary Labs actually diverge.
| Attribute | AVEVA System Platform | Canary Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3000/year |
| Pricing model | quote | Per tag band per year |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Web |
| Category | Manufacturing | Databases |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AVEVA System Platform
- ArchestrA object model
- InTouch HMI
- AVEVA Historian
- Redundancy
- Situational awareness graphics
- OMI
- Alarm management
- Connectivity
Only in Canary Labs
- Loss-less compression
- Unlimited clients
- Store and forward
- Views service
- Sparkplug B
- Calculation engine
- Axiom
- ODBC and REST
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AVEVA System Platform
- A multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different PLC brandsnot Canary Labs
- A water utility with a decade of ArchestrA templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justifiednot Canary Labs
- A pharmaceutical line needing ISA-88 batch recipe handling above existing Rockwell and Siemens controllersnot Canary Labs
- A plant modernising legacy InTouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scriptsnot Canary Labs
Canary Labs
- A manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a PI System enterprise agreementnot AVEVA System Platform
- A water utility replacing SCADA-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next SCADA replacementnot AVEVA System Platform
- An Ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboardsnot AVEVA System Platform
- A plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an auditnot AVEVA System Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AVEVA System Platform
- Wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.
- AVEVA Flex converts licensing to a recurring subscription draw-down, so organisations that budgeted for a perpetual licence with a support percentage face a materially different cost model at renewal.
- It is Windows only, and version compatibility between System Platform, Historian and InTouch is tight, so upgrades are coordinated projects rather than incremental patches.
- The ArchestrA object model has a steep learning curve and small systems end up paying for structure they do not need, which is why integrators often deploy standalone InTouch instead.
- Licence enforcement counts I/O aggressively and unexpected tag growth during commissioning can trigger a mid-project licence purchase at list price.
Canary Labs
- Pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.
- CustomerCare at 18 percent of licence cost is effectively mandatory on perpetual licences because lapsing it removes upgrades, so the perpetual option is not really a one-time cost.
- The storage format is proprietary; getting data out at volume means the ODBC connector, an additional 2,500 USD one-time or 1,000 USD a year, or writing against the REST API.
- Canary is a small vendor with a limited partner network outside North America, so support coverage and integrator availability in Europe and Asia are thinner than for AVEVA or Ignition.
- It is a Windows-only server product with no Linux or container deployment, which complicates placing collectors in modern edge estates.
Pricing, plan by plan
AVEVA System Platform
On request- AVEVA System Platform$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, client count and platform nodes
- Sold through AVEVA Flex subscription token pool or legacy perpetual licence
- Legacy perpetual licences carry an annual customer FIRST support fee
Canary Labs
$3000/year- Subscription, 3,500 tags$3000/year
- Unlimited Axiom clients
- Unlimited Excel clients
- Support and upgrades included
- Perpetual, 3,500 tags$8730/one-time
- 7,400 USD licence plus 1,330 USD first-year CustomerCare
- CustomerCare renews at 18 percent of licence cost per year
- Unlimited clients
- Private cloud, 3,500 tags$12320/year
- Hosted by Canary
- 1,500 USD one-time setup fee per system
- Scales to around 58,684 USD per year at 60,000 tags
- Enterprise unlimited$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags
- Negotiated licensing terms
- Quoted pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose AVEVA System Platform if
- You need archestra object model.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want intouch hmi.
Choose Canary Labs if
- You need loss-less compression.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want unlimited clients.
Questions people ask
- Is AVEVA System Platform or Canary Labs better?
- Neither clearly leads. AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and Canary Labs at $3000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AVEVA System Platform or Canary Labs?
- AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and Canary Labs at $3000/year.
- Does AVEVA System Platform or Canary Labs run on more platforms?
- AVEVA System Platform runs on Windows. Canary Labs runs on Windows, Web.
- What is AVEVA System Platform best used for?
- AVEVA System Platform is most often used for a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands, a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified, a pharmaceutical line needing isa-88 batch recipe handling above existing rockwell and siemens controllers, a plant modernising legacy intouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scripts. Of those, a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands and a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified are not what Canary Labs is typically brought in for.
- What can AVEVA System Platform do that Canary Labs cannot?
- AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian, Redundancy. Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Unlimited clients, Store and forward, Views service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AVEVA System Platform: Is Wonderware still sold?
No. The brand was retired; buy AVEVA System Platform, AVEVA InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian or AVEVA Plant SCADA instead.
Canary Labs: What does Canary cost?
8,730 USD for a 3,500 tag perpetual system including first-year CustomerCare, or 3,000 USD a year on subscription.
AVEVA System Platform: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
AVEVA steers new business to Flex subscriptions. Perpetual is increasingly restricted to existing agreements and renewals.
Canary Labs: Are client licences extra?
No. Unlimited Axiom browser clients and unlimited Excel clients are included on every tier.
AVEVA System Platform: Do my old InTouch applications still run?
Yes, legacy InTouch applications are supported in System Platform, though the older graphics do not gain the newer situational-awareness features without rework.
Canary Labs: Is perpetual cheaper than subscription?
Canary states perpetual pays off after roughly three years, and after that you still pay 18 percent CustomerCare annually.
AVEVA System Platform: What is AVEVA Flex?
A subscription credit pool you draw against for any AVEVA product, which trades a fixed licence for a recurring balance you must keep topped up.
Canary Labs: Does it use lossy compression?
No. Canary stores every collected value rather than approximating the trend, which matters for regulated data retention.
Related pages
More on AVEVA System Platform
More on Canary Labs
Other head to heads
- AVEVA System Platform vs Ignition
- AVEVA System Platform vs ABB 800xA
- AVEVA System Platform vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- AVEVA System Platform vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- AVEVA System Platform vs GENESIS Version 11
- AVEVA System Platform vs COPA-DATA zenon
- AVEVA System Platform vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- AVEVA System Platform vs Seeq
- AVEVA System Platform vs SolidWorks
- AVEVA System Platform vs Materialise Magics
- AVEVA System Platform vs Aras Innovator
- AVEVA System Platform vs Propel
- AVEVA System Platform vs KCF Technologies
- AVEVA System Platform vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AVEVA System Platform vs LabVIEW
- AVEVA System Platform vs SKF Enlight Centre
- AVEVA System Platform vs Hippo CMMS
- AVEVA System Platform vs VerneMQ
- AVEVA System Platform vs EMQX
- AVEVA System Platform vs TimescaleDB
- AVEVA System Platform vs QuestDB
- AVEVA System Platform vs Solace PubSub+
- AVEVA System Platform vs Firebase Realtime Database
- AVEVA System Platform vs Apache Doris
- AVEVA System Platform vs Convex
- AVEVA System Platform vs Instaclustr
- AVEVA System Platform vs Cockroach Labs
- AVEVA System Platform vs Meilisearch
- AVEVA System Platform vs DuckDB
- AVEVA System Platform vs BigQuery
- AVEVA System Platform vs CosmosDB
- AVEVA System Platform vs DataStax
- AVEVA System Platform vs dbt
- AVEVA System Platform vs FaunaDB
- Canary Labs vs Ignition
- Canary Labs vs ABB 800xA
- Canary Labs vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Canary Labs vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Canary Labs vs GENESIS Version 11
- Canary Labs vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Canary Labs vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Canary Labs vs Seeq
- Canary Labs vs SolidWorks
- Canary Labs vs Materialise Magics
- Canary Labs vs Aras Innovator
- Canary Labs vs Propel
- Canary Labs vs KCF Technologies
- Canary Labs vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Canary Labs vs LabVIEW
- Canary Labs vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Canary Labs vs Hippo CMMS
- Canary Labs vs VerneMQ
- Canary Labs vs EMQX
- Canary Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Canary Labs vs QuestDB
- Canary Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Canary Labs vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Canary Labs vs Apache Doris
- Canary Labs vs Convex
- Canary Labs vs Instaclustr
- Canary Labs vs Cockroach Labs
- Canary Labs vs Meilisearch
- Canary Labs vs DuckDB
- Canary Labs vs BigQuery
- Canary Labs vs CosmosDB
- Canary Labs vs DataStax
- Canary Labs vs dbt
- Canary Labs vs FaunaDB
