AI · head to head
AutoGen vs Make
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AutoGen framework now in maintenance mode, no new features planned; Make free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month
- They diverge on capability: AutoGen covers Multi-agent orchestration, Make covers Visual workflow builder.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AutoGen and Make actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AutoGen
- Multi-agent orchestration
- Message passing API
- AgentChat API
- Extensions API
- MCP server support
- AutoGen Studio
- Cross-language support
- Observable agent networks
Only in Make
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- API connectors
- Conditional logic
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AutoGen
- Building multi-agent conversational systemsnot Make
- Rapid prototyping of agent applicationsnot Make
- Research on agentic AI patterns and architecturesnot Make
- Distributed agent networks across boundariesnot Make
Make
- Automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applicationsnot AutoGen
- Building AI agents and workflow automation without extensive codingnot AutoGen
- Enterprise automation with GDPR, SOC 2 Type II compliancenot AutoGen
- Rapid deployment of automations from concept to livenot AutoGen
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AutoGen
- Framework now in maintenance mode, no new features planned
- Steeper learning curve for advanced use cases
- Microsoft recommends new projects use Agent Framework instead
- Limited to Python and .NET platforms
Make
- Free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month
- Free tier restricted to 2 active scenarios maximum
- Free tier enforces 15-minute minimum scheduling interval
- Credit-based model means costs scale with usage volume, not just features
Pricing, plan by plan
AutoGen
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT and CC-BY-4.0 licenses
- Full framework access
- Community support
Make
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Make review.
Which should you pick?
Choose AutoGen if
- You need multi-agent orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Python, .NET.
- You also want message passing api.
Choose Make if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want webhooks.
Questions people ask
- Is AutoGen or Make better?
- Neither clearly leads. AutoGen starts at Free and Make at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AutoGen or Make?
- AutoGen starts at Free and Make at Free.
- Does AutoGen or Make run on more platforms?
- AutoGen runs on Python, .NET. Make runs on Web.
- Can I use AutoGen for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is AutoGen best used for?
- AutoGen is most often used for building multi-agent conversational systems, rapid prototyping of agent applications, research on agentic ai patterns and architectures, distributed agent networks across boundaries. Of those, building multi-agent conversational systems and rapid prototyping of agent applications are not what Make is typically brought in for.
- What can AutoGen do that Make cannot?
- AutoGen covers Multi-agent orchestration, Message passing API, AgentChat API, Extensions API. Make covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, API connectors, Conditional logic.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AutoGen: Is AutoGen still actively developed?
As of March 2026, AutoGen is in maintenance mode and will not receive new features. Microsoft recommends new projects use the Microsoft Agent Framework instead.
SourceMake: How is Make priced and does the free plan expire?
Make offers a free plan with 1,000 credits per month at no cost and no time limit. The free plan includes the no-code workflow builder, access to 3,000+ apps, and customer support. Paid tiers (Core, Pro, Teams) are $9-$29/month with 10,000+ credits included.
SourceAutoGen: Can I still use AutoGen for new projects?
While AutoGen is stable and maintained for existing projects, Microsoft recommends using the Microsoft Agent Framework for new development.
SourceMake: What happens if I exceed my monthly credits?
Extra credits beyond the monthly allowance can be purchased in bundles of 1,000 or 10,000. Auto-purchasing is available for Core, Pro, and Teams plans to automatically buy additional credits when needed.
SourceAutoGen: What LLM providers does AutoGen support?
AutoGen includes extensions for OpenAI and Azure OpenAI through its Extensions API, with community support for other providers.
SourceMake: Can I save money by switching to annual billing?
Yes, annual plans offer 15% or more savings compared to monthly billing. Monthly subscriptions continue until the end of the billing month, while annual plans run for 12 months.
SourceMake: What happens to unused credits if I cancel?
Unused monthly credits expire at the end of each billing cycle. With annual subscriptions on Pro and Teams plans, credits are maintained for the full 12-month term. Users can cancel at any time and the organization converts to the free plan after the current billing cycle ends.
SourceMake: How many active scenarios can I create on the free plan versus paid plans?
The free plan is limited to 2 active scenarios and has a 15-minute minimum interval between runs. Paid plans (Core and above) offer unlimited active scenarios with the ability to schedule runs down to the minute.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- AutoGen vs Pika
- AutoGen vs Anthropic API
- AutoGen vs D-ID
- AutoGen vs Fathom
- AutoGen vs Together AI
- AutoGen vs Stable Diffusion
- AutoGen vs Arize AI
- AutoGen vs ChatGPT
- AutoGen vs Perplexity
- AutoGen vs Black Forest Labs
- AutoGen vs Cartesia
- AutoGen vs Deepgram
- AutoGen vs Galileo
- AutoGen vs Helicone
- AutoGen vs Ideogram
- AutoGen vs Jasper
- AutoGen vs LangGraph
- AutoGen vs Lindy
- AutoGen vs HubSpot CRM
- AutoGen vs Fireflies.ai
- AutoGen vs Gather
- AutoGen vs IFTTT
- AutoGen vs Otter.ai
- AutoGen vs tl;dv
- AutoGen vs Vidyard
- AutoGen vs ConnectWise
- AutoGen vs Grain
- AutoGen vs Kaseya VSA
- AutoGen vs Krisp
- AutoGen vs Mmhmm
- AutoGen vs Monday Sales CRM
- AutoGen vs Mural
- AutoGen vs N-able N-central
- AutoGen vs Pop
- AutoGen vs Slack Workflow Builder
- AutoGen vs Splashtop
- Make vs Pika
- Make vs Anthropic API
- Make vs D-ID
- Make vs Fathom
- Make vs Together AI
- Make vs Stable Diffusion
- Make vs Arize AI
- Make vs ChatGPT
- Make vs Perplexity
- Make vs Black Forest Labs
- Make vs Cartesia
- Make vs Deepgram
- Make vs Galileo
- Make vs Helicone
- Make vs Ideogram
- Make vs Jasper
- Make vs LangGraph
- Make vs Lindy
- Make vs HubSpot CRM
- Make vs Fireflies.ai
- Make vs Gather
- Make vs IFTTT
- Make vs Otter.ai
- Make vs tl;dv
- Make vs Vidyard
- Make vs ConnectWise
- Make vs Grain
- Make vs Kaseya VSA
- Make vs Krisp
- Make vs Mmhmm
- Make vs Monday Sales CRM
- Make vs Mural
- Make vs N-able N-central
- Make vs Pop
- Make vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Make vs Splashtop


