Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs Rhombus Systems

Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Rhombus Systems
Cybersecurity
Cloud-managed cameras, sensors and access control with a per-camera annual licence
- From
- $149/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Authy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; Rhombus Systems the per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- They diverge on capability: Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and Rhombus Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authy | Rhombus Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $149/year |
| Pricing model | free | Per camera per year licence plus hardware |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in Rhombus Systems
- On-camera storage
- No NVR or server
- AI search
- Access control
- Environmental sensors
- Unlimited users
- Ten year hardware warranty
- Optional cloud archiving
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot Rhombus Systems
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot Rhombus Systems
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot Rhombus Systems
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot Rhombus Systems
Rhombus Systems
- A school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local IT at each sitenot Authy
- A clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trailnot Authy
- A logistics operator that wants to search for a specific vehicle across sites without scrubbing footagenot Authy
- An office estate replacing ageing NVRs where nobody remains who knows how to maintain themnot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
Rhombus Systems
- The per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- Cameras must be Rhombus, so there is no reuse of existing IP cameras and migrating away means replacing every device rather than changing software.
- Cloud archiving is priced separately by retention and stream count, and long retention on multisensor cameras runs into five figures per camera, which can dwarf everything else in the quote.
- On-camera storage is the default retention, so a camera physically stolen or destroyed takes its unarchived footage with it unless cloud archiving was paid for on that camera.
- Analytics and integrations are good for mid-market needs but shallower than a dedicated enterprise VMS with a large third-party ecosystem, so specialist requirements like advanced LPR or forensic search hit limits.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
Rhombus Systems
$149/year- Professional$149/year
- Per camera per year
- Cloud console and management
- On-camera storage retention
- Enterprise$199/year
- Per camera per year
- Everything in Professional
- Flexible cloud archiving options
- Cloud archiving$undefined/year
- Priced separately by retention period and stream count
- Multisensor cameras cost several times a single sensor camera
- Long retention on multisensor models can reach five figures per camera
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Choose Rhombus Systems if
- You need on-camera storage.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no nvr or server.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or Rhombus Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and Rhombus Systems at $149/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or Rhombus Systems?
- Authy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authy and $149/year for Rhombus Systems.
- Does Authy or Rhombus Systems run on more platforms?
- Authy runs on Web. Rhombus Systems runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Yes. Authy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Rhombus Systems starts at $149/year.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what Rhombus Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that Rhombus Systems cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation. Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage, No NVR or server, AI search, Access control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
Rhombus Systems: Do I need an NVR or a server?
No. Cameras record on board and connect directly to the cloud console, which is the main operational reason organisations pick it.
Authy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
Rhombus Systems: What does the licence cost?
Roughly $149 per camera per year for Professional and about $199 for Enterprise, typically sold in one, three, five or ten year terms.
Authy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
Rhombus Systems: Is cloud storage included?
No. On-camera storage is the default. Cloud archiving is a separate charge priced by retention duration and number of streams.
Authy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
Rhombus Systems: Can I use my existing cameras?
No. The platform works only with Rhombus hardware, which is the trade-off for the zero-server architecture.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
More on Rhombus Systems
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs Spot AI
- Authy vs Salient CompleteView
- Authy vs Milestone XProtect
- Authy vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Authy vs DTiQ
- Authy vs Motorola Vigilant
- Authy vs Genetec Security Center
- Authy vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Authy vs Camio
- Authy vs Dahua Technology
- Authy vs March Networks
- Authy vs Envysion
- Authy vs Avast One
- Authy vs Chainguard
- Authy vs Cosign
- Authy vs CyberGhost VPN
- Authy vs Descope
- Rhombus Systems vs LastPass
- Rhombus Systems vs 1Password
- Rhombus Systems vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Rhombus Systems vs Norton 360
- Rhombus Systems vs Google Authenticator
- Rhombus Systems vs Cisco Duo
- Rhombus Systems vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Rhombus Systems vs RoboForm
- Rhombus Systems vs ExpressVPN
- Rhombus Systems vs Authelia
- Rhombus Systems vs Stytch
- Rhombus Systems vs WorkOS
- Rhombus Systems vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Rhombus Systems vs Sticky Password
- Rhombus Systems vs Surfshark
- Rhombus Systems vs Tanium
- Rhombus Systems vs Teleport
- Rhombus Systems vs Spot AI
- Rhombus Systems vs Salient CompleteView
- Rhombus Systems vs Milestone XProtect
- Rhombus Systems vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Rhombus Systems vs DTiQ
- Rhombus Systems vs Motorola Vigilant
- Rhombus Systems vs Genetec Security Center
- Rhombus Systems vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Camio
- Rhombus Systems vs Dahua Technology
- Rhombus Systems vs March Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Envysion
- Rhombus Systems vs Avast One
- Rhombus Systems vs Chainguard
- Rhombus Systems vs Cosign
- Rhombus Systems vs CyberGhost VPN
- Rhombus Systems vs Descope
