Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs CKAN
Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; CKAN the package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install
- They diverge on capability: Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, CKAN covers Dataset Management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and CKAN actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in CKAN
- Dataset Management
- Data Harvesting
- API Access
- Visualization
- Extensions
- DataPusher
- Harvester
- Third-party Tools
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot CKAN
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot CKAN
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot CKAN
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot CKAN
CKAN
- Publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portalnot Authy
- Self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an APInot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
CKAN
- The package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install
- Only Solr 9 and Solr 8 are supported, and from CKAN 2.10 they are the only Solr versions supported at all
- A working deployment requires PostgreSQL, Solr, Redis, nginx, supervisor and uWSGI to be installed and maintained separately
- Python 3.10 or later is required
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
CKAN
Free- Open SourceFree
- Data Management
- API Access
- Visualization
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Choose CKAN if
- You need dataset management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want data harvesting.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or CKAN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and CKAN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or CKAN?
- Authy starts at Free and CKAN at Free.
- Does Authy or CKAN run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what CKAN is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that CKAN cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation. CKAN covers Dataset Management, Data Harvesting, API Access, Visualization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
CKAN: Is CKAN open-source and what license is it available under?
Yes, CKAN is an open-source data management system built on Python and available on GitHub. The license terms are available on their GitHub repository.
SourceAuthy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
CKAN: Does CKAN offer commercial support for organizations?
Yes, CKAN offers commercial support through certified providers including Link Digital and Datopian. Support includes advisory services, application development, integration, managed hosting, and web development.
SourceAuthy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
CKAN: Who is responsible for hosting costs when running CKAN?
Organizations deploying CKAN are responsible for their own hosting infrastructure. Commercial providers like Datopian and Link Digital offer managed hosting services if organizations prefer not to self-host.
SourceAuthy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs Granicus
- Authy vs DocuWare
- Authy vs Accela
- Authy vs CivicPlus
- Authy vs Socrata
- Authy vs DataSF
- Authy vs mySidewalk
- Authy vs Laserfiche
- Authy vs IAPro
- Authy vs Bidnet Direct
- Authy vs eCode360
- Authy vs Axon Records
- Authy vs CitizenLab
- Authy vs ClearGov
- Authy vs DemandStar
- Authy vs MyRec.com
- Authy vs Legistar
- CKAN vs LastPass
- CKAN vs 1Password
- CKAN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CKAN vs Norton 360
- CKAN vs Google Authenticator
- CKAN vs Cisco Duo
- CKAN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- CKAN vs RoboForm
- CKAN vs ExpressVPN
- CKAN vs Authelia
- CKAN vs Stytch
- CKAN vs WorkOS
- CKAN vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- CKAN vs Sticky Password
- CKAN vs Surfshark
- CKAN vs Tanium
- CKAN vs Teleport
- CKAN vs Granicus
- CKAN vs DocuWare
- CKAN vs Accela
- CKAN vs CivicPlus
- CKAN vs Socrata
- CKAN vs DataSF
- CKAN vs mySidewalk
- CKAN vs Laserfiche
- CKAN vs IAPro
- CKAN vs Bidnet Direct
- CKAN vs eCode360
- CKAN vs Axon Records
- CKAN vs CitizenLab
- CKAN vs ClearGov
- CKAN vs DemandStar
- CKAN vs MyRec.com
- CKAN vs Legistar