Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Arnica

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Arnica covers AI SAST.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Arnica actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Arnica
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Arnica
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Arnica
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot authentik
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot authentik
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot authentik
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot authentik
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Arnica better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Arnica at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Arnica?
- authentik starts at Free and Arnica at Free.
- Does authentik or Arnica run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Arnica is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Arnica cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- Arnica vs 1Password
- Arnica vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Arnica vs Norton 360
- Arnica vs LastPass
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs Brave Browser
- Arnica vs Clerk
- Arnica vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Arnica vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Arnica vs Mullvad VPN
- Arnica vs OneTrust
- Arnica vs Private Internet Access
- Arnica vs Proton Mail
- Arnica vs Tuta
- Arnica vs Akeyless
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Frontegg
