Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Vanta

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Vanta
Cybersecurity
Compliance automation platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001 and similar frameworks.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Authelia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Vanta no published pricing for any tier; all plans require requesting a demo and contacting sales
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Vanta actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Vanta
Nothing recorded that Authelia does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Vanta
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Vanta
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Vanta
Vanta
- SaaS and fintech companies needing rapid SOC 2 certification for enterprise salesnot Authelia
- Healthcare organisations automating HIPAA compliance managementnot Authelia
- European companies managing GDPR and privacy compliancenot Authelia
- Organisations implementing ISO 27001 and other security standardsnot Authelia
- Companies conducting vendor security assessments and managing third-party risknot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Vanta
- No published pricing for any tier; all plans require requesting a demo and contacting sales
- Essentials tier limited to one compliance framework; organisations needing multiple frameworks must upgrade to higher tiers
- Plus and Professional tiers feature unclear differentiation; specific pricing and included questionnaires not published
- Enterprise pricing fully custom; no transparency on costs or what features are included
- AI questionnaire automation capped at 25 annually in Plus tier, only 144 annually in Professional tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Vanta
On request- Essentials$undefined/variable
- One compliance framework
- Vanta AI Agent features
- Automated evidence collection
- Plus$undefined/variable
- All Essentials features
- Enhanced AI Agent capabilities
- AI-powered questionnaire automation (25 annually)
- Professional$undefined/variable
- All Plus features
- 144 questionnaires annually (marked 'Most Popular')
- Risk management tools
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Fully customisable package
- Flexible, scalable, advanced compliance
- Tailored to sophisticated GRC requirements
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Vanta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Vanta at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Vanta?
- Authelia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authelia and On request for Vanta.
- Does Authelia or Vanta run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Vanta runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Yes. Authelia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Vanta starts at On request.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Vanta is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Vanta cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Vanta: How many compliance frameworks does Vanta support?
Vanta supports 35+ compliance frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR and custom frameworks.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Vanta: Does Vanta automate questionnaires?
Yes. Vanta's AI Agent can automate questionnaire completion, with the number of annually supported questionnaires varying by plan (25 in Plus tier, 144 in Professional tier).
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Vanta: How many integrations does Vanta support?
Vanta integrates with 300+ pre-built system connections and supports over 90% automation of compliance tasks through these integrations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Norton 360
- Authelia vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authelia vs LastPass
- Authelia vs Drata
- Authelia vs OneTrust
- Authelia vs NICE Actimize
- Authelia vs Transcend
- Authelia vs ThetaRay
- Authelia vs Omada Identity
- Authelia vs Resolver
- Authelia vs Saviynt
- Authelia vs Metasploit
- Authelia vs MetricStream
- Authelia vs Microsoft Defender
- Authelia vs Mimecast
- Authelia vs Motorola Vigilant
- Authelia vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Vanta vs authentik
- Vanta vs Logto
- Vanta vs Ory Kratos
- Vanta vs Frontegg
- Vanta vs Infisical
- Vanta vs Bitwarden
- Vanta vs Semgrep
- Vanta vs Trivy
- Vanta vs Chainguard
- Vanta vs Passbolt
- Vanta vs 1Password
- Vanta vs Signicat
- Vanta vs Silent Eight
- Vanta vs Socket
- Vanta vs Socure
- Vanta vs SonicWall
- Vanta vs Sophos Intercept X
- Vanta vs Ory
- Vanta vs Norton 360
- Vanta vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Vanta vs LastPass
- Vanta vs Drata
- Vanta vs OneTrust
- Vanta vs NICE Actimize
- Vanta vs Transcend
- Vanta vs ThetaRay
- Vanta vs Omada Identity
- Vanta vs Resolver
- Vanta vs Saviynt
- Vanta vs Metasploit
- Vanta vs MetricStream
- Vanta vs Microsoft Defender
- Vanta vs Mimecast
- Vanta vs Motorola Vigilant
- Vanta vs Microsoft Sentinel
