Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs OpenTelemetry

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OpenTelemetry
Cloud
Vendor-neutral standard for traces, metrics and logs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; OpenTelemetry genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and OpenTelemetry actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authelia | OpenTelemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in OpenTelemetry
- Vendor-neutral SDKs
- Collector
- Three signals
- Auto-instrumentation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot OpenTelemetry
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot OpenTelemetry
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot OpenTelemetry
OpenTelemetry
- Instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor laternot Authelia
- Standardising telemetry across services written in different languagesnot Authelia
- Routing and filtering telemetry centrally to control observability spendnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
OpenTelemetry
- Genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right
- Language SDKs mature at different rates, so a polyglot estate gets uneven support
- It produces and moves telemetry but does not store or visualise it, so a backend is still required and still billed
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
OpenTelemetry
Free- OpenTelemetryFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose OpenTelemetry if
- You need vendor-neutral sdks.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want collector.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or OpenTelemetry better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and OpenTelemetry at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or OpenTelemetry?
- Authelia starts at Free and OpenTelemetry at Free.
- Does Authelia or OpenTelemetry run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. OpenTelemetry runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what OpenTelemetry is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that OpenTelemetry cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs, Collector, Three signals, Auto-instrumentation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
OpenTelemetry: Is OpenTelemetry free?
Yes, open source under the CNCF. What you pay for is the backend you export to.
Authelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
OpenTelemetry: Does OpenTelemetry replace Datadog or Grafana?
No. It replaces their proprietary agents and instrumentation libraries. You still need a backend to store and query the data.
Authelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
OpenTelemetry: Why adopt a vendor-neutral standard?
Because instrumentation is the expensive part. Once code emits OTel, changing observability vendor is a collector config change instead of re-instrumenting every service.
Related pages
More on OpenTelemetry
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Zipkin
- Authelia vs Grafana Cloud
- Authelia vs VictoriaMetrics
- Authelia vs OpenEBS
- Authelia vs Fly.io
- Authelia vs Cerebrium
- Authelia vs Northflank
- Authelia vs Oracle Cloud
- Authelia vs Porter
- Authelia vs Serverless Framework
- Authelia vs CapRover
- Authelia vs Coolify
- Authelia vs IBM Cloud
- Authelia vs Koyeb
- Authelia vs Microsoft Azure
- Authelia vs Nitric
- Authelia vs Nomad
- OpenTelemetry vs authentik
- OpenTelemetry vs Logto
- OpenTelemetry vs Ory Kratos
- OpenTelemetry vs Frontegg
- OpenTelemetry vs Infisical
- OpenTelemetry vs Bitwarden
- OpenTelemetry vs Semgrep
- OpenTelemetry vs Trivy
- OpenTelemetry vs Chainguard
- OpenTelemetry vs Passbolt
- OpenTelemetry vs 1Password
- OpenTelemetry vs Signicat
- OpenTelemetry vs Silent Eight
- OpenTelemetry vs Socket
- OpenTelemetry vs Socure
- OpenTelemetry vs SonicWall
- OpenTelemetry vs Sophos Intercept X
- OpenTelemetry vs Ory
- OpenTelemetry vs Zipkin
- OpenTelemetry vs Grafana Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs VictoriaMetrics
- OpenTelemetry vs OpenEBS
- OpenTelemetry vs Fly.io
- OpenTelemetry vs Cerebrium
- OpenTelemetry vs Northflank
- OpenTelemetry vs Oracle Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Porter
- OpenTelemetry vs Serverless Framework
- OpenTelemetry vs CapRover
- OpenTelemetry vs Coolify
- OpenTelemetry vs IBM Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Koyeb
- OpenTelemetry vs Microsoft Azure
- OpenTelemetry vs Nitric
- OpenTelemetry vs Nomad
