Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Semperis

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Semperis
Cybersecurity
Identity threat detection and Active Directory forest recovery for AD, Entra ID and Okta, from a privately held US vendor.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Authelia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Semperis scope is limited to Active Directory, Entra ID and Okta, so an organisation whose critical identity lives elsewhere gets little from it, and the recovery value declines in direct proportion to how much has already moved off on-premises AD.
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Semperis covers Active Directory Forest Recovery.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Semperis actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Semperis
- Active Directory Forest Recovery
- Malware-free restore
- Replication-stream monitoring
- Automated rollback
- Attack indicator scoring
- Entra ID and Okta coverage
- Purple Knight
- Forest Druid
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Semperis
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Semperis
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Semperis
Semperis
- An organisation that cannot answer an auditor or insurer asking how long it would take to rebuild Active Directory after a destructive attacknot Authelia
- Post-incident recovery where domain controllers are compromised and restoring from system-state backup would reintroduce the attacker's footholdnot Authelia
- Continuous detection of privileged group changes and directory-level tampering that domain controller security logs missnot Authelia
- Hybrid estates where AD, Entra ID and Okta all matter and no single tool currently shows changes across the threenot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Semperis
- Scope is limited to Active Directory, Entra ID and Okta, so an organisation whose critical identity lives elsewhere gets little from it, and the recovery value declines in direct proportion to how much has already moved off on-premises AD.
- The licence buys tooling, not a proven runbook: forest recovery is only worth what your last rehearsal demonstrated, and a plan that has never been executed end to end in a lab is an untested assumption regardless of what was purchased.
- It overlaps with backup and directory management products from Quest, Veeam, Commvault and others, so the buyer must argue internally why a dedicated product is needed alongside a backup contract that already claims to protect Active Directory.
- Running Directory Services Protector well requires someone who understands AD internals, replication metadata and Tier 0 attack paths, and without that person the alerts on privileged changes are either ignored or auto-reverted in ways that break legitimate administration.
- Licensing is driven by identity object counts, so directories carrying years of stale user accounts and service principals pay for objects that should have been deleted, and the cleanup project that would reduce the bill is the one nobody has time for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Semperis
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Semperis review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Semperis if
- You need active directory forest recovery.
- You also want malware-free restore.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Semperis better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Semperis at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Semperis?
- Authelia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authelia and On request for Semperis.
- Does Authelia or Semperis run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Semperis runs on Web.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Yes. Authelia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Semperis starts at On request.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Semperis is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Semperis cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Semperis covers Active Directory Forest Recovery, Malware-free restore, Replication-stream monitoring, Automated rollback.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Semperis: Does this replace my backups?
No. It replaces the Active Directory recovery procedure specifically. You still need backups for everything else, and the point of Semperis is that a generic system-state backup of a domain controller is a poor way to recover a forest because it restores the operating system along with whatever compromised it.
Authelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Semperis: Is it useful if we are cloud-only on Entra ID?
Partly. Directory Services Protector covers Entra ID and Okta for change tracking and posture, but the forest recovery product, which is the strongest reason to buy, applies to on-premises Active Directory. A genuinely cloud-only organisation should weigh it against Microsoft's own tooling.
Authelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Semperis: Are Purple Knight and Forest Druid really free?
Yes, both are free downloads with no licence requirement, and they are widely used by organisations that are not Semperis customers. They are also, transparently, the top of the sales funnel.
Semperis: How long does forest recovery actually take?
The honest answer is whatever your rehearsal took. The vendor's case is hours instead of days, and automation genuinely removes most manual steps, but the number that matters for your board is the one from a test in your own environment.
Semperis: Does it require agents on domain controllers?
It collects directory changes from the AD replication stream, which is what lets it see changes that bypass the security log. Deployment details vary by product and version, so confirm the exact architecture against your domain controller change-control rules.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authelia vs Norton 360
- Authelia vs LastPass
- Authelia vs NICE Actimize
- Authelia vs Netwrix
- Authelia vs VMware Carbon Black
- Authelia vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Authelia vs One Identity
- Authelia vs Ping Identity
- Authelia vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Authelia vs Authy
- Authelia vs Baffle
- Authelia vs Beyond Identity
- Authelia vs BeyondTrust
- Authelia vs Burp Suite
- Authelia vs Bitdefender VPN
- Semperis vs authentik
- Semperis vs Logto
- Semperis vs Ory Kratos
- Semperis vs Frontegg
- Semperis vs Infisical
- Semperis vs Bitwarden
- Semperis vs Semgrep
- Semperis vs Trivy
- Semperis vs Chainguard
- Semperis vs Passbolt
- Semperis vs 1Password
- Semperis vs Signicat
- Semperis vs Silent Eight
- Semperis vs Socket
- Semperis vs Socure
- Semperis vs SonicWall
- Semperis vs Sophos Intercept X
- Semperis vs Ory
- Semperis vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Semperis vs Norton 360
- Semperis vs LastPass
- Semperis vs NICE Actimize
- Semperis vs Netwrix
- Semperis vs VMware Carbon Black
- Semperis vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Semperis vs One Identity
- Semperis vs Ping Identity
- Semperis vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Semperis vs Authy
- Semperis vs Baffle
- Semperis vs Beyond Identity
- Semperis vs BeyondTrust
- Semperis vs Burp Suite
- Semperis vs Bitdefender VPN
