APIs · head to head
Asyncapi vs Steampipe

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Asyncapi complex to implement and debug asynchronous operations due to their non-linear and concurrent nature; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- They diverge on capability: Asyncapi covers API Specification, Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Asyncapi and Steampipe actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Asyncapi
- API Specification
- Code generation
- Documentation
- Multiple messaging protocols
- Code generators
- Specification support
- Tools support
- CLI support
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Asyncapi
- API Developmentnot Steampipe
- API Gatewaynot Steampipe
- API Testingnot Steampipe
- API Documentationnot Steampipe
- Microservicesnot Steampipe
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Asyncapi
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Asyncapi
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Asyncapi
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Asyncapi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Asyncapi
- Complex to implement and debug asynchronous operations due to their non-linear and concurrent nature
- Keeping AsyncAPI documents up to date is challenging as systems evolve
- Tracing and debugging asynchronous operations is more difficult than synchronous request-response patterns
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Pricing, plan by plan
Asyncapi
Free- Open SourceFree
- AsyncAPI specification
- Tools
- Community support
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Asyncapi if
- You need api specification.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE Extensions.
- You also want code generation.
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Questions people ask
- Is Asyncapi or Steampipe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Asyncapi starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Asyncapi or Steampipe?
- Asyncapi starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
- Does Asyncapi or Steampipe run on more platforms?
- Asyncapi runs on Web, CLI, IDE Extensions. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Asyncapi for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Asyncapi best used for?
- Asyncapi is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
- What can Asyncapi do that Steampipe cannot?
- Asyncapi covers API Specification, Code generation, Documentation, Multiple messaging protocols. Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Asyncapi: What is AsyncAPI used for?
AsyncAPI is an open-source specification for defining and documenting asynchronous APIs, message-driven systems, and event-driven architectures. It serves the same purpose for async APIs as OpenAPI does for REST APIs, providing standardized documentation, code generation, and tooling.
SourceSteampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
Asyncapi: Is AsyncAPI free to use?
Yes, AsyncAPI is completely free and open-source. It is hosted by the Linux Foundation and supported by community contributions and sponsorships from companies like Postman, IBM, IQVIA Technology, and Solace.
SourceSteampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
Asyncapi: What protocols and technologies does AsyncAPI support?
AsyncAPI supports multiple protocols and technologies including Kafka, RabbitMQ, MQTT, Socket.IO, AWS EventBridge, and others. It provides language support for JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, and PHP.
SourceSteampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Asyncapi: Does AsyncAPI have IDE support?
Yes, AsyncAPI has IDE extensions available for VSCode and IntelliJ, along with CLI utilities and GitHub Actions integration for developers.
SourceSteampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Asyncapi vs Hasura
- Asyncapi vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Asyncapi vs Gravitee
- Asyncapi vs PocketBase
- Asyncapi vs Janus Gateway
- Asyncapi vs Directus
- Asyncapi vs Appwrite
- Asyncapi vs Bruno
- Asyncapi vs Kong Gateway
- Asyncapi vs Convoy
- Asyncapi vs Parse Server
- Asyncapi vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Asyncapi vs Neonomics
- Asyncapi vs Payload CMS
- Asyncapi vs Portkey
- Asyncapi vs Prisma
- Asyncapi vs RapidAPI
- Asyncapi vs Kong
- Asyncapi vs Atlantis
- Asyncapi vs Jitsu
- Asyncapi vs Frappe
- Asyncapi vs Visual Studio Code
- Asyncapi vs Penpot
- Asyncapi vs GNU Emacs
- Asyncapi vs Bazel
- Asyncapi vs Eclipse IDE
- Asyncapi vs Pants Build
- Asyncapi vs Swagger UI
- Asyncapi vs Ansible
- Asyncapi vs Helix
- Asyncapi vs JFrog Artifactory
- Asyncapi vs Namespace
- Asyncapi vs Nix
- Asyncapi vs Nixpacks
- Asyncapi vs Octopus Deploy
- Asyncapi vs Okteto
- Steampipe vs Hasura
- Steampipe vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Steampipe vs Gravitee
- Steampipe vs PocketBase
- Steampipe vs Janus Gateway
- Steampipe vs Directus
- Steampipe vs Appwrite
- Steampipe vs Bruno
- Steampipe vs Kong Gateway
- Steampipe vs Convoy
- Steampipe vs Parse Server
- Steampipe vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Steampipe vs Neonomics
- Steampipe vs Payload CMS
- Steampipe vs Portkey
- Steampipe vs Prisma
- Steampipe vs RapidAPI
- Steampipe vs Kong
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs JFrog Artifactory
- Steampipe vs Namespace
- Steampipe vs Nix
- Steampipe vs Nixpacks
- Steampipe vs Octopus Deploy
- Steampipe vs Okteto

