Softwr

Software · head to head

Asset Panda vs Razorpay

Asset Panda logo

Asset Panda

Software

Flexible asset tracking platform

From
On request
Rated
-
R

Razorpay

Software

Accept, process and disburse payments with India's leading payments platform

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Asset Panda pricing is not published; the vendor asks for a demo or a quote; Razorpay international card payments cost up to 3% per transaction versus 2% domestically, per razorpay.com/pricing (Aug 2026), and an 18% GST is added on top of the platform fee

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Asset Panda and Razorpay actually diverge.

Attributes where Asset Panda and Razorpay differ
AttributeAsset PandaRazorpay
Pricing modelsubscriptiontransaction
PlatformsWeb, Mobile app, Cloud-basedWeb
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Asset Panda

  • Custom workflows
  • Asset lifecycle
  • Maintenance tracking
  • GPS tracking
  • Salesforce
  • ServiceNow
  • Zendesk
  • Active Directory

Only in Razorpay

Nothing recorded that Asset Panda does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Asset Panda

  • IT asset and device tracking through their lifecyclenot Razorpay
  • Equipment and tool tracking across sitesnot Razorpay
  • Scheduled inspections and maintenance workflowsnot Razorpay
  • Fleet and facilities managementnot Razorpay
  • Audit readiness and compliance reportingnot Razorpay

Razorpay

No use cases recorded yet. See the Razorpay review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Asset Panda

  • Pricing is not published; the vendor asks for a demo or a quote

Razorpay

  • International card payments cost up to 3% per transaction versus 2% domestically, per razorpay.com/pricing (Aug 2026), and an 18% GST is added on top of the platform fee
  • Instant refunds cost between Rs. 7.99 and Rs. 14.99 per refund on top of the transaction fee, per Razorpay's own pricing page; standard refunds are free but instant ones are not

Pricing, plan by plan

Asset Panda

On request
  • Standard$50/month
    • 500 assets
    • 5 users
    • Standard support
  • Professional$100/month
    • 2500 assets
    • 15 users
    • Priority support
  • Enterprise$200/month
    • Unlimited assets
    • Unlimited users
    • Dedicated support

Razorpay

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Razorpay review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Asset Panda if

  • You need custom workflows.
  • You work on Web, Mobile app, Cloud-based.
  • You also want asset lifecycle.

Choose Razorpay if

Nothing in the data separates Razorpay from Asset Panda on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Questions people ask

Is Asset Panda or Razorpay better?
Neither clearly leads. Asset Panda starts at On request and Razorpay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Asset Panda or Razorpay?
Asset Panda starts at On request and Razorpay at On request.
Does Asset Panda or Razorpay run on more platforms?
Asset Panda runs on Web, Mobile app, Cloud-based. Razorpay runs on Web.
What is Asset Panda best used for?
Asset Panda is most often used for it asset and device tracking through their lifecycle, equipment and tool tracking across sites, scheduled inspections and maintenance workflows, fleet and facilities management. Of those, it asset and device tracking through their lifecycle and equipment and tool tracking across sites are not what Razorpay is typically brought in for.
What can Asset Panda do that Razorpay cannot?
Asset Panda covers Custom workflows, Asset lifecycle, Maintenance tracking, GPS tracking.
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads