Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Keycloak

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Arnica does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Keycloak
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Keycloak
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Keycloak
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Keycloak
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Arnica
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Arnica
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Arnica
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Arnica
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Keycloak?
- Arnica starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Arnica or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Keycloak cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceArnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceArnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Penpot
- Arnica vs Soketi
- Arnica vs Ansible
- Arnica vs Atlantis
- Arnica vs Vite
- Arnica vs Depot
- Arnica vs Pants Build
- Arnica vs Buildkite
- Arnica vs Coder
- Arnica vs Jitsu
- Arnica vs Bitbucket
- Arnica vs Sweep
- Arnica vs Azure DevOps
- Arnica vs Backstage
- Arnica vs Claude Code
- Arnica vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Arnica vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Semgrep
- Keycloak vs Snyk
- Keycloak vs Chainguard
- Keycloak vs Tenable
- Keycloak vs Doppler
- Keycloak vs Aikido
- Keycloak vs Endor Labs
- Keycloak vs Trivy
- Keycloak vs Socket
- Keycloak vs Infisical
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs RoboForm
- Keycloak vs Sardine
- Keycloak vs Semperis
- Keycloak vs SentinelOne
- Keycloak vs Shufti Pro
- Keycloak vs Nessus
- Keycloak vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
