Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Backstage

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Backstage
Developer Tools
Open source internal developer portal framework created and open sourced by Spotify
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Backstage backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, Backstage covers Software catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Backstage actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Backstage
- Software catalogue
- Software templates
- TechDocs
- Plugin architecture
- Kubernetes plugin
- Search
- Entity ownership model
- Auth provider integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Backstage
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Backstage
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Backstage
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Backstage
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Backstage
Backstage
- An engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morningnot Arnica
- A platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, CI and security defaults already wired innot Arnica
- A company consolidating scattered READMEs and Confluence pages into docs that live beside the code and cannot silently rot unnoticednot Arnica
- A regulated business that needs an auditable register of every running service, its owner and its data classificationnot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Backstage
- Backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.
- Upstream releases move quickly and plugin APIs have broken across major versions, so a customised deployment accumulates upgrade debt and teams routinely fall months behind on versions they cannot cheaply catch up on.
- The catalogue is only as good as the YAML descriptors engineers remember to write; without enforcement the register drifts out of date, and a developer portal nobody trusts is abandoned faster than one that never existed.
- Community plugin quality varies sharply, with many unmaintained or pinned to old core versions, so the plugin that made the business case may be the one blocking your next upgrade.
- Spotify Portal, the packaged commercial route, publishes no price at all and is quoted as a custom annual subscription, so the only cost you can actually forecast up front is the self-hosted one, which is the option with the largest hidden staffing bill.
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Backstage
Free- Backstage (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Software catalogue, templates, TechDocs and search
- Full plugin ecosystem
- Spotify Portal for Backstage$undefined/year
- Packaged commercial distribution from Spotify
- Spotify premium plugins including Soundcheck and Insights
- Simplified setup and managed upgrade path
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose Backstage if
- You need software catalogue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want software templates.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Backstage better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Backstage at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Backstage?
- Arnica starts at Free and Backstage at Free.
- Does Arnica or Backstage run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Backstage runs on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Backstage is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Backstage cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. Backstage covers Software catalogue, Software templates, TechDocs, Plugin architecture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceBackstage: Is Backstage free?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The real cost is engineering time; teams commonly dedicate one to two engineers permanently to running it.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceBackstage: Do I need to write code to use it?
Yes. Configuring and extending a Backstage application is a TypeScript and React project. This is the single most common misjudgement buyers make.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceBackstage: What is Spotify Portal for Backstage?
A commercial distribution from Spotify with premium plugins and support, generally available since October 2025 and sold as a quoted annual subscription with no published price.
Backstage: Who owns the project?
Spotify created and open sourced it; it is now a CNCF project, so the upstream roadmap is not solely Spotify controlled.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Harness
- Arnica vs Cortex
- Arnica vs OpsLevel
- Arnica vs Tilt
- Arnica vs Ansible
- Arnica vs Soketi
- Arnica vs Penpot
- Arnica vs Bazel
- Arnica vs Eclipse IDE
- Arnica vs Pants Build
- Arnica vs Helix
- Arnica vs Jitsu
- Arnica vs Swagger UI
- Arnica vs Yarn
- Arnica vs Buildkite
- Backstage vs Semgrep
- Backstage vs Snyk
- Backstage vs Chainguard
- Backstage vs Tenable
- Backstage vs Doppler
- Backstage vs Aikido
- Backstage vs Endor Labs
- Backstage vs Trivy
- Backstage vs Socket
- Backstage vs Infisical
- Backstage vs Bitwarden
- Backstage vs RoboForm
- Backstage vs Sardine
- Backstage vs Semperis
- Backstage vs SentinelOne
- Backstage vs Shufti Pro
- Backstage vs Nessus
- Backstage vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Backstage vs Harness
- Backstage vs Cortex
- Backstage vs OpsLevel
- Backstage vs Tilt
- Backstage vs Ansible
- Backstage vs Soketi
- Backstage vs Penpot
- Backstage vs Bazel
- Backstage vs Eclipse IDE
- Backstage vs Pants Build
- Backstage vs Helix
- Backstage vs Jitsu
- Backstage vs Swagger UI
- Backstage vs Yarn
- Backstage vs Buildkite
