Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Snyk

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Snyk free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Snyk actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Snyk does not also cover.
Only in Snyk
- Open source security
- Code security (SAST)
- Container security
- IaC security
- License compliance
- Fix PRs
- Priority scoring
- Developer IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Snyk
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Snyk
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Snyk
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Snyk
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Snyk
Snyk
- Vulnerability scanningnot Keycloak
- Application securitynot Keycloak
- Infrastructure as Code securitynot Keycloak
- Container securitynot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Snyk
- Free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- Free and Team plans count only contributing developers making commits within 90 days; public contributions do not count
- Enterprise plan requires custom pricing and sales contact
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Snyk
Free- FreeFree
- SCA scanning
- SAST scanning
- IaC and Container scanning
- Team$25/month
- 1000 Code tests
- 100 projects
- Jira integration
- Ignite$105/month
- Unlimited tests
- Unlimited projects
- Custom security rules
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Zero-day prevention
- Unified AppSec control
- Full SDLC automation
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Snyk if
- You need open source security.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- You also want code security (sast).
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Snyk better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Snyk at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Snyk?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Snyk at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Snyk run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Snyk runs on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Snyk is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Snyk cannot?
- Snyk covers Open source security, Code security (SAST), Container security, IaC security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceSnyk: How much does Snyk cost?
Snyk offers a free plan with limited tests, Team plan at $25/month per contributing developer, Ignite at $1260/year, and custom Enterprise pricing. Contributing developers are those who made commits to private repos within the last 90 days.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceSnyk: What does Snyk's Team plan include?
The Team plan at $25/month includes 1000 Code tests, up to 100 projects, Jira integration, next business day support, and all features from the free plan including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceSnyk: Is there a free version of Snyk?
Yes, Snyk offers a free plan with full platform access including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning. The free tier includes 200 Open Source tests, 100 Code tests, 300 IaC tests, 100 Container tests, and up to 5 projects.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs Brave Browser
- Keycloak vs Clerk
- Keycloak vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Keycloak vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Keycloak vs Mullvad VPN
- Keycloak vs OneTrust
- Keycloak vs Private Internet Access
- Keycloak vs Proton Mail
- Keycloak vs Tuta
- Keycloak vs Akeyless
- Keycloak vs Doppler
- Keycloak vs Frontegg
- Keycloak vs Infisical
- Snyk vs Visual Studio Code
- Snyk vs ESLint
- Snyk vs pnpm
- Snyk vs Turborepo
- Snyk vs GitHub Copilot
- Snyk vs Penpot
- Snyk vs Rust
- Snyk vs CLion
- Snyk vs GNAT Pro
- Snyk vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Snyk vs GNU Emacs
- Snyk vs Keil MDK
- Snyk vs Vite
- Snyk vs Bazel
- Snyk vs CodeSandbox
- Snyk vs Eclipse IDE
- Snyk vs Moonrepo
- Snyk vs Nx Cloud
- Snyk vs 1Password
- Snyk vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Snyk vs Norton 360
- Snyk vs LastPass
- Snyk vs Bitwarden
- Snyk vs Brave Browser
- Snyk vs Clerk
- Snyk vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Snyk vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Snyk vs Mullvad VPN
- Snyk vs OneTrust
- Snyk vs Private Internet Access
- Snyk vs Proton Mail
- Snyk vs Tuta
- Snyk vs Akeyless
- Snyk vs Doppler
- Snyk vs Frontegg
- Snyk vs Infisical

