Softwr

Testing · head to head

Applitools vs Tricentis Tosca

Applitools logo

Applitools

Testing

AI-based visual regression testing, priced on component and page checkpoint volume

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Tricentis Tosca logo

Tricentis Tosca

Testing

Model based test automation for enterprise applications, with deep SAP and mainframe coverage

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Applitools the entry tier alone costs 667 US dollars a month on annual billing, a genuinely high floor compared to Percy's tiers or a plain screenshot-diffing open source approach.; Tricentis Tosca licensing is quoted per workstation at enterprise figures, so the tool only pays back where testing headcount is already large; a team of five will not recover the cost.
  • They diverge on capability: Applitools covers Visual AI comparison, Tricentis Tosca covers Model based test design.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Applitools and Tricentis Tosca actually diverge.

Attributes where Applitools and Tricentis Tosca differ
AttributeApplitoolsTricentis Tosca
Pricing modelPer month by checkpoint volumequote
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWindows, Web

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Applitools

  • Visual AI comparison
  • Storybook component testing
  • Figma design comparison
  • Cross-browser and device visual testing
  • Accessibility testing
  • NLP-based test authoring

Only in Tricentis Tosca

  • Model based test design
  • SAP coverage
  • Risk based test selection
  • API and message layer testing
  • Test data management
  • Distributed execution

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Applitools

  • A team that abandoned pixel-diffing visual regression testing because of false-positive fatigue and wants a lower-noise alternativenot Tricentis Tosca
  • A design system team wanting component-level visual testing against Storybook rather than only full-page checksnot Tricentis Tosca
  • An organisation wanting automated verification that shipped UI matches its Figma source designnot Tricentis Tosca
  • A team wanting NLP-based visual test authoring to reduce the coding overhead of writing visual test scripts, available at Professional tiernot Tricentis Tosca

Tricentis Tosca

  • Regression testing an SAP estate through an S/4HANA migration where thousands of transactions must be verifiednot Applitools
  • A regulated organisation that needs auditable evidence of what was tested before each releasenot Applitools
  • Testing a mixed estate of browser, Windows desktop and mainframe applications from one suitenot Applitools
  • A test centre of excellence with dozens of testers where per screen maintenance beats per test maintenancenot Applitools

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Applitools

  • The entry tier alone costs 667 US dollars a month on annual billing, a genuinely high floor compared to Percy's tiers or a plain screenshot-diffing open source approach.
  • Professional and Enterprise tiers, which hold the more advanced authoring and unlimited execution features, are quote-only, removing pricing transparency exactly where a large buyer most needs it.
  • Visual AI still occasionally flags false positives on genuinely novel layouts or animation-heavy interfaces, so a baseline review process is still needed, not eliminated.
  • Checkpoint-based pricing means cost is directly tied to test suite size and coverage breadth, so expanding visual test coverage has a direct, compounding cost impact unlike time-based or seat-based pricing models.
  • Teams migrating from a simpler pixel-diffing tool face real setup and baseline migration work to establish Applitools baselines correctly across a large existing UI.

Tricentis Tosca

  • Licensing is quoted per workstation at enterprise figures, so the tool only pays back where testing headcount is already large; a team of five will not recover the cost.
  • Building the initial application model takes months and is usually done with paid consultants, meaning value arrives long after the invoice does.
  • The authoring environment is Windows only and heavy, which sits awkwardly in organisations whose engineers work on macOS or Linux.
  • Tricentis has assembled its portfolio through acquisitions, so products sold together vary in how deeply they are integrated and a buyer should verify the joins rather than the diagram.
  • Skills are specific to Tosca and not transferable, so recruiting testers means hiring for a niche tool and losing a trained one hurts more than losing a Selenium engineer.

Pricing, plan by plan

Applitools

On request
  • Starter$667/month
    • Billed annually
    • 100,000 component checkpoints or 1,000 page checkpoints
    • Visual AI, Storybook and Figma integration, accessibility testing
  • Professional$undefined/month
    • Custom quote, starting around 150 active pages or 1,500 components
    • Unlimited executions, NLP-based test authoring
    • Priority support with a dedicated Slack channel
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Custom quote, starting around 350 active pages or 1,500 components
    • SSO and dedicated or private cloud
    • Custom SLAs and a weekly account manager

Tricentis Tosca

On request
  • Tricentis Tosca$undefined/year
    • Quoted per workstation licence with separate execution agents and module packs
    • Implementation is normally sold with partner services, which typically exceed first year licence cost

Which should you pick?

Choose Applitools if

  • You need visual ai comparison.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want storybook component testing.
Applitools review

Choose Tricentis Tosca if

  • You need model based test design.
  • You work on Windows, Web.
  • You also want sap coverage.
Tricentis Tosca review

Questions people ask

Is Applitools or Tricentis Tosca better?
Neither clearly leads. Applitools starts at On request and Tricentis Tosca at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Applitools or Tricentis Tosca?
Applitools starts at On request and Tricentis Tosca at On request.
Does Applitools or Tricentis Tosca run on more platforms?
Applitools runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tricentis Tosca runs on Windows, Web.
What is Applitools best used for?
Applitools is most often used for a team that abandoned pixel-diffing visual regression testing because of false-positive fatigue and wants a lower-noise alternative, a design system team wanting component-level visual testing against storybook rather than only full-page checks, an organisation wanting automated verification that shipped ui matches its figma source design, a team wanting nlp-based visual test authoring to reduce the coding overhead of writing visual test scripts, available at professional tier. Of those, a team that abandoned pixel-diffing visual regression testing because of false-positive fatigue and wants a lower-noise alternative and a design system team wanting component-level visual testing against storybook rather than only full-page checks are not what Tricentis Tosca is typically brought in for.
What can Applitools do that Tricentis Tosca cannot?
Applitools covers Visual AI comparison, Storybook component testing, Figma design comparison, Cross-browser and device visual testing. Tricentis Tosca covers Model based test design, SAP coverage, Risk based test selection, API and message layer testing.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Applitools: How is Applitools priced?

By checkpoint volume, component or page-level screenshot comparisons, with the entry Starter tier at 667 US dollars a month for 100,000 component or 1,000 page checkpoints.

Tricentis Tosca: Is Tosca scriptless?

Test assembly is scriptless, but non trivial estates still need TQL queries and custom modules, which is programming under another name.

Applitools: How is it different from Percy?

Applitools uses an AI-based perceptual comparison model designed to reduce false positives from rendering noise; Percy is generally pixel-diffing based and lower cost per screenshot.

Tricentis Tosca: Why does it dominate SAP testing?

It holds SAP certification, covers SAP GUI and Fiori at transaction level, and is sold through the same integrators that run SAP programmes.

Applitools: Does it test individual components or only full pages?

Both; Storybook integration allows component-level visual testing in addition to full-page checks.

Tricentis Tosca: Can it replace Selenium for a web only product?

It can, but the economics do not work. Model based testing pays off across large heterogeneous estates, not one web application.

Share

Related pages

More on Applitools

More on Tricentis Tosca

Keep looking

Other head to heads