APIs · head to head
Apollo GraphQL vs Astra

Apollo GraphQL
APIs
GraphQL platform and API orchestration layer for building unified graphs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Astra
APIs
Instant payments API for push-to-card, card-to-account and FedNow transfers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Apollo GraphQL has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apollo GraphQL pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.; Astra push-to-card costs materially more per transaction than ACH, so a platform that switches all payouts to instant sees payment costs rise sharply, and the usual answer of charging the recipient for speed only works where recipients will pay.
- They diverge on capability: Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, Astra covers Instant disbursements.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo GraphQL and Astra actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apollo GraphQL | Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | web, api | API, Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo GraphQL
- Apollo Connectors
- GraphOS Router
- Schema registry
- Schema checks
- Response caching
- Audit logging
Only in Astra
- Instant disbursements
- Card to account
- Net debit mode
- FedNow and RTP transfers
- ACH transfers
- Routing logic
- SDK
- Sandbox
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo GraphQL
- Federating multiple backend services into one GraphQL APInot Astra
- Wrapping legacy REST APIs for frontend consumptionnot Astra
- Enterprise API governance with schema checks and audit logsnot Astra
- Reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of datanot Astra
Astra
- A gig or marketplace platform paying workers to their debit cards at the end of a shift rather than on a weekly ACH cyclenot Apollo GraphQL
- An insurer settling small claims instantly to a claimant debit card to remove the cheque processnot Apollo GraphQL
- A lending product disbursing approved funds in seconds so the borrower experience matches the approval decisionnot Apollo GraphQL
- A consumer fintech letting users fund a new account from an existing debit card so the balance is usable immediatelynot Apollo GraphQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo GraphQL
- Pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.
- Adopting GraphOS effectively requires buy-in to the GraphQL paradigm, which is a larger architectural shift than adding a REST gateway.
- The free plan's 1-day data retention and 60 req/min self-hosted router limit make it unsuitable for production use.
- Volume-based per-request pricing can become expensive at very high request volumes compared to flat-rate API gateways.
Astra
- Push-to-card costs materially more per transaction than ACH, so a platform that switches all payouts to instant sees payment costs rise sharply, and the usual answer of charging the recipient for speed only works where recipients will pay.
- Original Credit Transaction support is not universal across card issuers, so a proportion of payouts fall back to slower rails and you must build and explain a two speed experience rather than promising instant to everyone.
- The programme depends on Cross River Bank as sponsor, a bank with concentrated fintech exposure and a documented regulatory history, so a single supervisory action on that institution is a direct operational risk to your payouts.
- Nothing is published on pricing, and per transaction economics vary by rail and volume, so small platforms cannot estimate cost before a sales conversation and have limited leverage in it.
- FedNow reach still depends on the recipient bank participating, so instant account-to-account is not available to every recipient and the routing logic has to degrade gracefully, which is more integration work than the single API framing suggests.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo GraphQL
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support
- Developer$5/month
- $5 per million requests with volume discounts
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- Standard$undefined/month
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- 24x7x365 support with SLA
Astra
On request- Astra Payments$undefined/year
- Per transaction pricing quoted by volume and rail
- Push-to-card economics differ materially from ACH
- Net debit mode available in place of prefunding
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo GraphQL if
- You need apollo connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want graphos router.
Choose Astra if
- You need instant disbursements.
- You work on API, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want card to account.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo GraphQL or Astra better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Astra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo GraphQL or Astra?
- Apollo GraphQL has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apollo GraphQL and On request for Astra.
- Does Apollo GraphQL or Astra run on more platforms?
- Apollo GraphQL runs on web, api. Astra runs on API, Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Apollo GraphQL for free?
- Yes. Apollo GraphQL has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Astra starts at On request.
- What is Apollo GraphQL best used for?
- Apollo GraphQL is most often used for federating multiple backend services into one graphql api, wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption, enterprise api governance with schema checks and audit logs, reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of data. Of those, federating multiple backend services into one graphql api and wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption are not what Astra is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo GraphQL do that Astra cannot?
- Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, GraphOS Router, Schema registry, Schema checks. Astra covers Instant disbursements, Card to account, Net debit mode, FedNow and RTP transfers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apollo GraphQL: What does Apollo GraphQL cost?
The Free plan supports up to 3 developers at no cost. Developer plan starts at $5 per million requests with a $50 signup credit, while Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales for custom pricing.
SourceAstra: Who is the sponsor bank?
Cross River Bank. All banking and payment services run through that relationship, so the bank should be part of your diligence rather than an implementation detail.
Apollo GraphQL: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free 'Forever Free' plan supports up to 3 developers, 1-day data retention for checks and insights, and a self-hosted router capped at 60 requests per minute.
SourceAstra: Do I have to prefund payouts?
Not necessarily. Astra offers a net debit arrangement where disbursements settle against a reserve rather than a permanently funded float account, which is the main working capital argument for the product.
Apollo GraphQL: How is usage metered on paid plans?
Standard requests are billed per million operations with tiered volume discounts, starting at $5.00/million for the first 250M and dropping to $3.00/million beyond 5B, with similar tiered pricing for subscription update events.
SourceAstra: Is every payout instant?
No. Push-to-card requires the recipient card issuer to support Original Credit Transactions, and FedNow requires the recipient bank to participate. The rest fall back to ACH.
Astra: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Pricing is per transaction and varies by rail and volume, and card rails cost considerably more than ACH.
Related pages
More on Apollo GraphQL
Other head to heads
- Apollo GraphQL vs Liveblocks
- Apollo GraphQL vs GraphQL Playground
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hasura
- Apollo GraphQL vs Pusher
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ozone API
- Apollo GraphQL vs WSO2 API Manager
- Apollo GraphQL vs Boomi API Management
- Apollo GraphQL vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ably
- Apollo GraphQL vs Apigee
- Apollo GraphQL vs Lithic
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swan
- Apollo GraphQL vs Method Financial
- Apollo GraphQL vs Neonomics
- Apollo GraphQL vs Payload CMS
- Apollo GraphQL vs Portkey
- Apollo GraphQL vs Prisma
- Apollo GraphQL vs Increase
- Apollo GraphQL vs Sila
- Apollo GraphQL vs Unit
- Apollo GraphQL vs Vodeno
- Apollo GraphQL vs Griffin
- Apollo GraphQL vs Dwolla
- Apollo GraphQL vs Highnote
- Apollo GraphQL vs Treasury Prime
- Apollo GraphQL vs Column
- Apollo GraphQL vs Synctera
- Apollo GraphQL vs Gravitee
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hoppscotch
- Apollo GraphQL vs HTTPie
- Apollo GraphQL vs Janus Gateway
- Apollo GraphQL vs LiteLLM
- Astra vs Liveblocks
- Astra vs GraphQL Playground
- Astra vs Hasura
- Astra vs Pusher
- Astra vs Ozone API
- Astra vs WSO2 API Manager
- Astra vs Boomi API Management
- Astra vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Astra vs Ably
- Astra vs Apigee
- Astra vs Lithic
- Astra vs Swan
- Astra vs Method Financial
- Astra vs Neonomics
- Astra vs Payload CMS
- Astra vs Portkey
- Astra vs Prisma
- Astra vs Increase
- Astra vs Sila
- Astra vs Unit
- Astra vs Vodeno
- Astra vs Griffin
- Astra vs Dwolla
- Astra vs Highnote
- Astra vs Treasury Prime
- Astra vs Column
- Astra vs Synctera
- Astra vs Gravitee
- Astra vs Hoppscotch
- Astra vs HTTPie
- Astra vs Janus Gateway
- Astra vs LiteLLM
