APIs · head to head
Apollo GraphQL vs LiteLLM

Apollo GraphQL
APIs
GraphQL platform and API orchestration layer for building unified graphs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apollo GraphQL pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.; LiteLLM enterprise pricing based on annual request capacity and deployment architecture, sized via direct sales
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo GraphQL and LiteLLM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apollo GraphQL | LiteLLM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | web, api | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo GraphQL
- Apollo Connectors
- GraphOS Router
- Schema registry
- Schema checks
- Response caching
- Audit logging
Only in LiteLLM
Nothing recorded that Apollo GraphQL does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo GraphQL
- Federating multiple backend services into one GraphQL APInot LiteLLM
- Wrapping legacy REST APIs for frontend consumptionnot LiteLLM
- Enterprise API governance with schema checks and audit logsnot LiteLLM
- Reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of datanot LiteLLM
LiteLLM
- Accessing 140+ LLM providers through single APInot Apollo GraphQL
- Implementing cost-based routing for advanced AI tasksnot Apollo GraphQL
- Deploying new LLM models usually within a daynot Apollo GraphQL
- Switching backend models with config changes onlynot Apollo GraphQL
- Maintaining consistent access across 100+ endpointsnot Apollo GraphQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo GraphQL
- Pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.
- Adopting GraphOS effectively requires buy-in to the GraphQL paradigm, which is a larger architectural shift than adding a REST gateway.
- The free plan's 1-day data retention and 60 req/min self-hosted router limit make it unsuitable for production use.
- Volume-based per-request pricing can become expensive at very high request volumes compared to flat-rate API gateways.
LiteLLM
- Enterprise pricing based on annual request capacity and deployment architecture, sized via direct sales
- Not per-token based pricing for Enterprise tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo GraphQL
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support
- Developer$5/month
- $5 per million requests with volume discounts
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- Standard$undefined/month
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- 24x7x365 support with SLA
LiteLLM
Free- Open SourceFree
- 100+ providers
- One OpenAI API
- Virtual keys
- Enterprise$null/mo
- All Open Source features
- SSO + SCIM
- OIDC/JWT authentication
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo GraphQL if
- You need apollo connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want graphos router.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo GraphQL or LiteLLM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and LiteLLM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo GraphQL or LiteLLM?
- Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and LiteLLM at Free.
- Does Apollo GraphQL or LiteLLM run on more platforms?
- Apollo GraphQL runs on web, api. LiteLLM runs on Web.
- Can I use Apollo GraphQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apollo GraphQL best used for?
- Apollo GraphQL is most often used for federating multiple backend services into one graphql api, wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption, enterprise api governance with schema checks and audit logs, reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of data. Of those, federating multiple backend services into one graphql api and wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption are not what LiteLLM is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo GraphQL do that LiteLLM cannot?
- Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, GraphOS Router, Schema registry, Schema checks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apollo GraphQL: What does Apollo GraphQL cost?
The Free plan supports up to 3 developers at no cost. Developer plan starts at $5 per million requests with a $50 signup credit, while Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales for custom pricing.
SourceLiteLLM: Is LiteLLM free to use?
Yes, LiteLLM's open-source version is free forever and requires no credit card. Self-host in minutes with support for 100+ LLM providers.
SourceApollo GraphQL: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free 'Forever Free' plan supports up to 3 developers, 1-day data retention for checks and insights, and a self-hosted router capped at 60 requests per minute.
SourceLiteLLM: What does LiteLLM's Enterprise plan cost?
Enterprise pricing is custom and annual, sized based on your annual gateway request capacity, deployment architecture, and support needs. Not charged per token.
SourceApollo GraphQL: How is usage metered on paid plans?
Standard requests are billed per million operations with tiered volume discounts, starting at $5.00/million for the first 250M and dropping to $3.00/million beyond 5B, with similar tiered pricing for subscription update events.
SourceLiteLLM: Is there a free trial for Enterprise?
Yes, a 30-day Enterprise trial key is available via email with no credit card required.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apollo GraphQL
Other head to heads
- Apollo GraphQL vs Liveblocks
- Apollo GraphQL vs GraphQL Playground
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hasura
- Apollo GraphQL vs Pusher
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ozone API
- Apollo GraphQL vs WSO2 API Manager
- Apollo GraphQL vs Boomi API Management
- Apollo GraphQL vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ably
- Apollo GraphQL vs Apigee
- Apollo GraphQL vs Lithic
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swan
- Apollo GraphQL vs Method Financial
- Apollo GraphQL vs Neonomics
- Apollo GraphQL vs Payload CMS
- Apollo GraphQL vs Portkey
- Apollo GraphQL vs Prisma
- Apollo GraphQL vs Appwrite
- Apollo GraphQL vs PocketBase
- Apollo GraphQL vs Sanity
- Apollo GraphQL vs Kong Gateway
- Apollo GraphQL vs Convoy
- Apollo GraphQL vs Tyk
- Apollo GraphQL vs Volt
- Apollo GraphQL vs Formance
- Apollo GraphQL vs Janus Gateway
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hoppscotch
- Apollo GraphQL vs HTTPie
- Apollo GraphQL vs Kong
- LiteLLM vs Liveblocks
- LiteLLM vs GraphQL Playground
- LiteLLM vs Hasura
- LiteLLM vs Pusher
- LiteLLM vs Ozone API
- LiteLLM vs WSO2 API Manager
- LiteLLM vs Boomi API Management
- LiteLLM vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- LiteLLM vs Ably
- LiteLLM vs Apigee
- LiteLLM vs Lithic
- LiteLLM vs Swan
- LiteLLM vs Method Financial
- LiteLLM vs Neonomics
- LiteLLM vs Payload CMS
- LiteLLM vs Portkey
- LiteLLM vs Prisma
- LiteLLM vs Appwrite
- LiteLLM vs PocketBase
- LiteLLM vs Sanity
- LiteLLM vs Kong Gateway
- LiteLLM vs Convoy
- LiteLLM vs Tyk
- LiteLLM vs Volt
- LiteLLM vs Formance
- LiteLLM vs Janus Gateway
- LiteLLM vs Hoppscotch
- LiteLLM vs HTTPie
- LiteLLM vs Kong

