Spreadsheets · head to head
APITable vs Corteza

APITable
Spreadsheets
Open source spreadsheet database with an API first design and an embeddable widget system
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Corteza
No-Code
Apache-licensed open source low-code platform, formerly Crust, positioned against Salesforce
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: APITable records are held in the product own schema rather than as native database tables, so the practical row ceiling is a product limit and large tables should be load tested before commitment.; Corteza planet Crust is a small company of roughly a dozen or so people, so the entire commercial support capability behind Corteza is thin and a large deployment can outgrow the vendors ability to respond.
- They diverge on capability: APITable covers API first design, Corteza covers Corteza Low Code.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which APITable and Corteza actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in APITable
- API first design
- Widget SDK
- Embeddable views
- Multiple view types
- Linked records and formulas
- Self hosting
- Real time collaboration
Only in Corteza
- Corteza Low Code
- Automation and workflow
- Bundled CRM
- Case management
- Federation
- Role-based access control
- Corteza Messaging and integrations
- Self-hosted deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
APITable
- Embedding an editable table view inside a product you are building, rather than sending users to another toolnot Corteza
- An internal platform where tables are read and written mostly by code through the API and only occasionally by peoplenot Corteza
- A self hosted replacement for a per seat spreadsheet database where seat count is the cost drivernot Corteza
- Building a custom dashboard widget that sits beside the data instead of in a separate reporting toolnot Corteza
Corteza
- A European public body that needs a case management system on servers inside its own jurisdiction with an auditable licence and no per-seat vendor feenot APITable
- An NGO replacing a Salesforce donation that has run out, needing to keep the data model but remove the recurring costnot APITable
- An integrator building a regulated vertical application it intends to resell, requiring a permissive licence it can ship commerciallynot APITable
- A mid-size European company that wants one platform for internal applications and a sales pipeline without paying per seat as headcount growsnot APITable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
APITable
- Records are held in the product own schema rather than as native database tables, so the practical row ceiling is a product limit and large tables should be load tested before commitment.
- The hosted free tier caps records per space, so evaluating on the cloud version gives a misleading picture of what the software can do when self hosted.
- Automation is thin compared with the commercial alternatives, and most real workflows end up in an external automation tool.
- The self hosted deployment is heavier than a single container, so running it properly means managing several services rather than one.
- Documentation and community activity are uneven in English, and finding an answer to an operational problem can take longer than the problem itself deserves.
Corteza
- Planet Crust is a small company of roughly a dozen or so people, so the entire commercial support capability behind Corteza is thin and a large deployment can outgrow the vendors ability to respond.
- No pricing is published for Planet Crusts support, hosting or implementation services, so the true running cost of a supported deployment cannot be estimated without a sales conversation.
- The connector ecosystem is small compared with commercial low-code platforms, so integrations with common SaaS tools usually mean writing against the REST API rather than installing something.
- Hiring is hard: almost nobody has Corteza on a CV, so you are training internal developers on a niche platform and you cannot easily replace them.
- The bundled CRM is a starting point rather than a mature product, and teams that expect Salesforce-equivalent sales functionality out of the box will spend months building the gap themselves.
Pricing, plan by plan
APITable
Free- Self hosted open sourceFree
- No licence fee
- No product record cap on self hosted deployments
- Docker and Kubernetes deployment
Corteza
Free- Corteza communityFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed with no feature gating
- Low-code builder, workflow engine, CRM and case management included
- Self-hosted on your own infrastructure
- Planet Crust support and services$undefined/year
- Commercial support, hosting and implementation from Planet Crust
- Custom application development
- Training
Which should you pick?
Choose APITable if
- You need api first design.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want widget sdk.
Choose Corteza if
- You need corteza low code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want automation and workflow.
Questions people ask
- Is APITable or Corteza better?
- Neither clearly leads. APITable starts at Free and Corteza at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, APITable or Corteza?
- APITable starts at Free and Corteza at Free.
- Does APITable or Corteza run on more platforms?
- APITable runs on Web, Linux. Corteza runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Docker.
- Can I use APITable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is APITable best used for?
- APITable is most often used for embedding an editable table view inside a product you are building, rather than sending users to another tool, an internal platform where tables are read and written mostly by code through the api and only occasionally by people, a self hosted replacement for a per seat spreadsheet database where seat count is the cost driver, building a custom dashboard widget that sits beside the data instead of in a separate reporting tool. Of those, embedding an editable table view inside a product you are building, rather than sending users to another tool and an internal platform where tables are read and written mostly by code through the api and only occasionally by people are not what Corteza is typically brought in for.
- What can APITable do that Corteza cannot?
- APITable covers API first design, Widget SDK, Embeddable views, Multiple view types. Corteza covers Corteza Low Code, Automation and workflow, Bundled CRM, Case management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
APITable: What is the record limit?
The self hosted edition has no product cap, but performance is bounded by the internal schema rather than by your database. Test at your expected size.
Corteza: Is Corteza the same thing as Crust?
Yes. The project was branded Crust and renamed Corteza in 2019 when Crust Technology donated it to the Commons Conservancy.
APITable: Can I embed it in my own product?
Yes, and that is the main reason to choose it. Views embed and the widget SDK extends them.
Corteza: Who owns the code?
The Commons Conservancy, a Dutch foundation. Planet Crust in Cork is the primary developer and sells commercial services around it.
APITable: Is the hosted version representative?
No. Its free tier caps records per space, which is a commercial limit rather than a technical one.
Corteza: Is there a paid enterprise edition?
No. Corteza is Apache 2.0 with no feature gating. Planet Crust sells support, hosting and development instead of a restricted edition.
APITable: How hard is self hosting?
Harder than a single container. Plan for several services and someone to keep them running.
Corteza: Can it genuinely replace Salesforce?
For case management and a straightforward sales pipeline on a self-hosted footprint, yes. For a large sales organisation relying on AppExchange products and a mature ecosystem, no.
APITable: Does it do automations?
Lightly. Expect to pair it with an external automation tool for anything multi step.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- APITable vs Baserow
- APITable vs NocoDB
- APITable vs Teable
- APITable vs SeaTable
- APITable vs Mathesar
- APITable vs Rowy
- APITable vs Cube Software
- APITable vs Sigma Computing
- APITable vs Numbers
- APITable vs Tableau
- APITable vs Metabase
- APITable vs Looker
- APITable vs Equals
- APITable vs Coefficient
- APITable vs Appsmith
- APITable vs ToolJet
- APITable vs Zoho Creator
- APITable vs Appian
- APITable vs Momen
- APITable vs Kintone
- APITable vs Mendix
- APITable vs OutSystems
- APITable vs Noloco
- APITable vs WeWeb
- APITable vs Directual
- APITable vs Draftbit
- APITable vs Pabbly Connect
- APITable vs Stacker
- APITable vs Thunkable
- APITable vs Quickbase
- Corteza vs Baserow
- Corteza vs NocoDB
- Corteza vs Teable
- Corteza vs SeaTable
- Corteza vs Mathesar
- Corteza vs Rowy
- Corteza vs Cube Software
- Corteza vs Sigma Computing
- Corteza vs Numbers
- Corteza vs Tableau
- Corteza vs Metabase
- Corteza vs Looker
- Corteza vs Equals
- Corteza vs Coefficient
- Corteza vs Appsmith
- Corteza vs ToolJet
- Corteza vs Zoho Creator
- Corteza vs Appian
- Corteza vs Momen
- Corteza vs Kintone
- Corteza vs Mendix
- Corteza vs OutSystems
- Corteza vs Noloco
- Corteza vs WeWeb
- Corteza vs Directual
- Corteza vs Draftbit
- Corteza vs Pabbly Connect
- Corteza vs Stacker
- Corteza vs Thunkable
- Corteza vs Quickbase
