Softwr

Software · head to head

Apache Druid vs Apache Pinot

Apache Druid logo

Apache Druid

Software

Real-time analytics database for sub-second OLAP queries

From
Free
Rated
-
Apache Pinot logo

Apache Pinot

Software

Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Apache Druid open-source offering lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features; Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
  • They diverge on capability: Apache Druid covers Real-time Ingestion, Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Apache Druid and Apache Pinot actually diverge.

Attributes where Apache Druid and Apache Pinot differ
AttributeApache DruidApache Pinot
PlatformsDocker, Kubernetes, Native deployment (Java-based)Linux, Docker, Kubernetes

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (1999).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Apache Druid

  • Real-time Ingestion
  • Sub-second Queries
  • Column-oriented Storage
  • Streaming Integration
  • Approximate Algorithms
  • Flexible Schemas
  • Time-based Partitioning
  • Hadoop

Only in Apache Pinot

  • Real-time Analytics
  • Column-oriented
  • Distributed Processing
  • SQL Support
  • Pluggable Indexing
  • Star-tree Index
  • Upsert Support
  • Presto

Both cover

  • Kafka
  • Spark
  • Superset
  • Linux support
  • Docker support
  • Kubernetes support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Apache Druid

  • Real-time analytics platforms ingesting millions of events per second from streaming sourcesnot Apache Pinot
  • Applications requiring sub-second queries over high-cardinality datasets (billions to trillions of rows)not Apache Pinot
  • Time-series and event analysis at massive scale with columnar storage efficiencynot Apache Pinot

Apache Pinot

  • Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot Apache Druid
  • User-facing dashboards inside a productnot Apache Druid
  • Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot Apache Druid
  • Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot Apache Druid

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Apache Druid

  • Open-source offering lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
  • Requires native integration with Apache Kafka or Amazon Kinesis for real-time ingestion; custom integrations need development
  • High-concurrency query support (hundreds of thousands QPS) requires significant cluster infrastructure investment

Apache Pinot

  • Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
  • Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
  • Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database

Pricing, plan by plan

Apache Druid

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Apache Druid review.

Apache Pinot

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Real-time analytics
    • SQL queries
    • Horizontal scaling

Which should you pick?

Choose Apache Druid if

  • You need real-time ingestion.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Native deployment (Java-based).
  • You also want sub-second queries.

Choose Apache Pinot if

  • You need real-time analytics.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
  • You also want column-oriented.

Questions people ask

Is Apache Druid or Apache Pinot better?
Neither clearly leads. Apache Druid starts at Free and Apache Pinot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Apache Druid or Apache Pinot?
Apache Druid starts at Free and Apache Pinot at Free.
Does Apache Druid or Apache Pinot run on more platforms?
Apache Druid runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Native deployment (Java-based). Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
Can I use Apache Druid for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Apache Druid best used for?
Apache Druid is most often used for real-time analytics platforms ingesting millions of events per second from streaming sources, applications requiring sub-second queries over high-cardinality datasets (billions to trillions of rows), time-series and event analysis at massive scale with columnar storage efficiency. Of those, real-time analytics platforms ingesting millions of events per second from streaming sources and applications requiring sub-second queries over high-cardinality datasets (billions to trillions of rows) are not what Apache Pinot is typically brought in for.
What can Apache Druid do that Apache Pinot cannot?
Apache Druid covers Real-time Ingestion, Sub-second Queries, Column-oriented Storage, Streaming Integration. Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. Both handle Kafka, Spark, Superset, Linux support.

Related pages