APIs · head to head
Akana vs Lithic

Lithic
APIs
API-first card issuing platform with direct Visa, Mastercard and Amex network connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com; Lithic pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, Lithic covers Direct network connections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akana and Lithic actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akana
- API Lifecycle Management
- API Security
- Governance Controls
- OAuth
- SAML
- LDAP
- Active Directory
- Cloud support
Only in Lithic
- Direct network connections
- Processor Client mode
- Lithic Program Management
- Card lifecycle APIs
- Sandbox environment
- Real-time authorization controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akana
- API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Lithic
- Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Lithic
- Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Lithic
- Developer portal and API monetisationnot Lithic
- Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Lithic
Lithic
- A fintech wanting direct Visa or Mastercard network access rather than routing through a third-party processornot Akana
- A company that already holds its own issuing licence and wants API access without full programme managementnot Akana
- A neobank or expense platform wanting Lithic to manage bank and network relationships end to endnot Akana
- A product team prototyping a card programme in sandbox before committing to a launchnot Akana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akana
- Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
- Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered
Lithic
- Pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- Choosing Processor Client mode still leaves the company responsible for holding its own issuing licence and managing the regulatory relationship, which is a substantial undertaking many teams underestimate.
- As with any card infrastructure provider, an outage or network issue at Lithic becomes a direct outage for every card programme built on it, and a customer has limited visibility into root cause during an incident.
- Building a card programme on API infrastructure requires real engineering investment; it is not a plug-and-play product for a non-technical team.
- Switching card infrastructure providers after launch is a major undertaking involving card reissuance and programme migration, so the initial choice carries lasting lock-in.
Pricing, plan by plan
Akana
$2500/monthly- Professional$2500/monthly
- API Gateway
- Developer Portal
- Basic analytics
- Enterprise$5000/monthly
- Advanced governance
- Multi-cloud support
- Premium support
- Custom$undefined/monthly
- Custom solutions
- Dedicated support
- SLA guarantee
Lithic
On request- Lithic$undefined/year
- Volume and interchange-based pricing, not published
- Separate Processor Client and Program Management pricing tracks
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Akana if
- You need api lifecycle management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
- You also want api security.
Choose Lithic if
- You need direct network connections.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want processor client mode.
Questions people ask
- Is Akana or Lithic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Lithic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akana or Lithic?
- Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Lithic at On request.
- Does Akana or Lithic run on more platforms?
- Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Lithic runs on Web, API.
- What is Akana best used for?
- Akana is most often used for api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql, applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway, running the same platform on-premises, in kubernetes or across clouds, developer portal and api monetisation. Of those, api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql and applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway are not what Lithic is typically brought in for.
- What can Akana do that Lithic cannot?
- Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, OAuth. Lithic covers Direct network connections, Processor Client mode, Lithic Program Management, Card lifecycle APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akana: What does Akana API Platform include?
Akana provides mediation and integration capabilities for creating easy-to-consume API products from API code, with features for API governance, security, and operational management.
SourceLithic: Does Lithic publish pricing?
No, pricing is volume-based and requires a sales conversation.
Akana: How does Akana help secure APIs?
Akana addresses the security challenges that come with more APIs and more endpoints, providing tools for enterprise API governance and compliance management.
SourceLithic: What is the difference between Processor Client and Program Management?
Processor Client suits companies with their own issuing licence and bank relationships; Program Management is for companies wanting Lithic to coordinate those relationships on their behalf.
Lithic: Which networks does it connect to?
Visa, Mastercard and American Express directly.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akana vs Sanity
- Akana vs Appwrite
- Akana vs Hasura
- Akana vs PocketBase
- Akana vs Apigee
- Akana vs TIBCO Mashery
- Akana vs 3scale
- Akana vs WSO2 API Manager
- Akana vs Boomi API Management
- Akana vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Akana vs Kong
- Akana vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Akana vs Zimpler
- Akana vs Aiia
- Akana vs Akoya
- Akana vs Apidog
- Akana vs Astra
- Akana vs Thredd
- Akana vs Tribe Payments
- Akana vs Unit
- Akana vs Highnote
- Akana vs Vodeno
- Akana vs Swan
- Akana vs Treasury Prime
- Akana vs Marqeta
- Akana vs Synctera
- Akana vs Weavr
- Akana vs Increase
- Akana vs i2c
- Akana vs Brite Payments
- Akana vs Bruno
- Akana vs Bud Financial
- Akana vs Episode Six
- Akana vs Kong Gateway
- Lithic vs Sanity
- Lithic vs Appwrite
- Lithic vs Hasura
- Lithic vs PocketBase
- Lithic vs Apigee
- Lithic vs TIBCO Mashery
- Lithic vs 3scale
- Lithic vs WSO2 API Manager
- Lithic vs Boomi API Management
- Lithic vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Lithic vs Kong
- Lithic vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Lithic vs Zimpler
- Lithic vs Aiia
- Lithic vs Akoya
- Lithic vs Apidog
- Lithic vs Astra
- Lithic vs Thredd
- Lithic vs Tribe Payments
- Lithic vs Unit
- Lithic vs Highnote
- Lithic vs Vodeno
- Lithic vs Swan
- Lithic vs Treasury Prime
- Lithic vs Marqeta
- Lithic vs Synctera
- Lithic vs Weavr
- Lithic vs Increase
- Lithic vs i2c
- Lithic vs Brite Payments
- Lithic vs Bruno
- Lithic vs Bud Financial
- Lithic vs Episode Six
- Lithic vs Kong Gateway

