Databases · head to head
Airtable vs Noloco

Airtable
Databases
Create apps that perfectly fit your team's needs
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Noloco
No-Code
Client portals and internal tools built over data you already have
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Airtable is a cloud collaboration platform.
- Airtable starts at $20/user/mo; Noloco prices on request.
- Only Airtable lists spreadsheet-database hybrid; only Noloco lists row-level permissions.
- Where Airtable falls short: hitting a plan limit blocks adding records or attachments entirely until you upgrade, rather than degrading gracefully.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airtable and Noloco actually diverge.
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Airtable, founded for Noloco.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airtable
- Spreadsheet-database hybrid
- Custom views
- Automation
- Forms
- Integrations
- Mobile apps
- Real-time collaboration
- API access
Only in Noloco
- Row-level permissions
- Multiple data sources
- Client portals
- Workflows
- Forms and record detail pages
- White labelling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airtable
- Structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban viewsnot Noloco
- Lightweight internal tools built on shared recordsnot Noloco
- Automations between Airtable and other systemsnot Noloco
- Sharing read-only views with collaborators, who are not chargednot Noloco
- Collecting submissions through forms without paying for a seatnot Noloco
Noloco
- Giving clients a branded portal onto their own records in an Airtable basenot Airtable
- Replacing shared spreadsheets with a permissioned internal tool for an operations teamnot Airtable
- A lightweight CRM over a PostgreSQL database that already existsnot Airtable
- Partner or contractor dashboards where each party must see only its own jobs and documentsnot Airtable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airtable
- Hitting a plan limit blocks adding records or attachments entirely until you upgrade, rather than degrading gracefully
- Team is $20 per user per month and Business $45, both at the annual rate
- Automation and API usage are capped by plan
- Enterprise Scale pricing is not published
Noloco
- Pricing follows user counts, and a client portal is by definition many low-activity users, so an agency with a few hundred client logins climbs the bands quickly for people who sign in twice a month
- Limits are inherited from the data source. Airtable record ceilings, API rate limits and slow queries appear in the portal your customers use, and no setting inside Noloco can fix them
- Design control is deliberately narrow. You get a consistent application shell rather than a bespoke interface, which is fine for operations and a problem for anything marketing-led
- It is a small vendor competing directly with Airtable Interfaces and Softr, both far larger, so roadmap pace and long-term viability are legitimate procurement questions
- Output is responsive web only, with no native mobile application and no offline mode, so field staff on poor connections are not served by it
Pricing, plan by plan
Airtable
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited bases
- 1,000 records per base
- Up to 5 editors
- Team$20/user/mo
- 50,000 records per base
- Unlimited automations
- API access
- Business$45/user/mo
- 125,000 records per base
- Advanced permissions
- Priority support
- Enterprise ScaleOn request
- 500,000+ records per base
- Custom SLA
- Dedicated support
Noloco
On request- NolocoOn request
- Tiered plans differentiated by user counts, data sources and white labelling
- Trial period rather than a permanent free plan
- Higher tiers add custom domains, advanced permissions and priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Airtable if
- You need spreadsheet-database hybrid.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS.
- You also want custom views.
Questions people ask
- Is Airtable or Noloco better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airtable starts at Free and Noloco at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airtable or Noloco?
- Airtable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Airtable and On request for Noloco.
- Does Airtable or Noloco run on more platforms?
- Airtable runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS. Noloco runs on Web.
- Can I use Airtable for free?
- Yes. Airtable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Noloco starts at On request.
- What is Airtable best used for?
- Airtable is most often used for structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban views, lightweight internal tools built on shared records, automations between airtable and other systems, sharing read-only views with collaborators, who are not charged. Of those, structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban views and lightweight internal tools built on shared records are not what Noloco is typically brought in for.
- What can Airtable do that Noloco cannot?
- Airtable covers Spreadsheet-database hybrid, Custom views, Automation, Forms. Noloco covers Row-level permissions, Multiple data sources, Client portals, Workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Airtable: Is there a free Airtable plan and what does it include?
Yes, Airtable's Free plan is indefinite with unlimited bases, 1,000 records per base, up to 5 editors, 1 GB storage per base, 100 automation runs per month, and core features like Interface Designer and mobile apps.
SourceNoloco: Do I need Airtable to use it?
No. Airtable is the most common source but PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets, HubSpot and built-in Noloco tables all work.
Airtable: How does Airtable handle permissions and viewers?
Airtable charges per editor only. Read-only viewers, form submitters, and people accessing share links are free on every plan, making it cost-effective for large viewing audiences.
SourceNoloco: Can external clients log in without paying for seats?
Client and internal users are counted differently, but they are still counted, so a portal with many client logins moves you up the plan bands. Check the current band definitions before committing to a per-client model.
Airtable: What are Airtable's record limits?
Free plan has 1,000 records per base, Team plan has 50,000, Business plan has 125,000, and Enterprise Scale has 500,000+ records. Performance degrades past 100,000 records in a single base.
SourceNoloco: How is this different from Softr?
Both build portals over existing data. Noloco leans harder on permissions and multiple database sources; Softr leans on templates, speed to a first version and a bigger ecosystem.
Airtable: Can Airtable integrate with other tools like Slack?
Yes, Airtable integrates with Slack via Zapier or Make.com, allowing automation like sending Slack messages when records are created or updated. Airtable also has a native API for direct integrations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Airtable vs Grist
- Airtable vs Ninox
- Airtable vs Knack
- Airtable vs Amazon Aurora
- Airtable vs NATS
- Airtable vs Turso
- Airtable vs Apache Spark
- Airtable vs Chroma
- Airtable vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Airtable vs Cockroach Labs
- Airtable vs PostgreSQL
- Airtable vs Apache Kafka
- Airtable vs RabbitMQ
- Airtable vs ClickHouse
- Airtable vs Elasticsearch
- Airtable vs PlanetScale
- Airtable vs Redis
- Airtable vs Apache Airflow
- Airtable vs Softr
- Airtable vs Stacker
- Airtable vs AppSheet
- Airtable vs Glide
- Airtable vs Appsmith
- Airtable vs Superblocks
- Airtable vs ToolJet
- Airtable vs Whalesync
- Airtable vs Caspio
- Airtable vs Zoho Creator
- Airtable vs Appian
- Airtable vs WeWeb
- Airtable vs Adalo
- Airtable vs Bubble
- Airtable vs Kintone
- Airtable vs Mendix
- Airtable vs FlutterFlow
- Airtable vs OutSystems
- Noloco vs Grist
- Noloco vs Ninox
- Noloco vs Knack
- Noloco vs Amazon Aurora
- Noloco vs NATS
- Noloco vs Turso
- Noloco vs Apache Spark
- Noloco vs Chroma
- Noloco vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Noloco vs Cockroach Labs
- Noloco vs PostgreSQL
- Noloco vs Apache Kafka
- Noloco vs RabbitMQ
- Noloco vs ClickHouse
- Noloco vs Elasticsearch
- Noloco vs PlanetScale
- Noloco vs Redis
- Noloco vs Apache Airflow
- Noloco vs Softr
- Noloco vs Stacker
- Noloco vs AppSheet
- Noloco vs Glide
- Noloco vs Appsmith
- Noloco vs Superblocks
- Noloco vs ToolJet
- Noloco vs Whalesync
- Noloco vs Caspio
- Noloco vs Zoho Creator
- Noloco vs Appian
- Noloco vs WeWeb
- Noloco vs Adalo
- Noloco vs Bubble
- Noloco vs Kintone
- Noloco vs Mendix
- Noloco vs FlutterFlow
- Noloco vs OutSystems
