Healthcare · head to head
Aidoc vs Halaxy

Aidoc
Healthcare
FDA cleared radiology AI for triage and notification of time critical findings
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Halaxy
Healthcare
Practice management for allied health that charges nothing for the software and earns on payments
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Halaxy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aidoc the clearances are for triage and notification in the CADt category, so the software may reorder a worklist but may not deliver a diagnosis or replace a read, and business cases built on reduced radiologist workload do not survive contact with the regulatory wording.; Halaxy the software being free does not mean the platform is cheap: a clinic taking most payments by card pays roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus a fixed fee on every transaction, which on a high volume practice comfortably exceeds what a flat AUD 60 per practitioner subscription would have cost.
- They diverge on capability: Aidoc covers Triage and notification, Halaxy covers No licence fee.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aidoc and Halaxy actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aidoc
- Triage and notification
- Intracranial haemorrhage
- Pulmonary embolism
- Large vessel occlusion
- Pneumothorax on X-ray
- aiOS platform
- Clinical workflow notifications
Only in Halaxy
- No licence fee
- Integrated claiming
- Credit-based extras
- Online booking
- Clinical notes and templates
- Card payments
- Multi-practitioner diary
- Patient portal
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aidoc
- A regional stroke centre that wants large vessel occlusion flagged and the neurointervention team notified before the radiologist dictatesnot Halaxy
- A trauma centre wanting cervical spine fracture and intra abdominal free gas prioritised in an overnight queue read by one on call radiologistnot Halaxy
- An oncology imaging programme that wants incidental pulmonary embolism caught on staging CTs ordered for a different questionnot Halaxy
- A health system that has bought AI from several vendors and wants one PACS integration through aiOS rather than one integration per algorithmnot Halaxy
Halaxy
- A solo psychologist starting out who wants Medicare and private health claiming without committing to a monthly subscription before there is any incomenot Aidoc
- A physiotherapy clinic that wants patient reminders, online booking and card payments reconciled against invoices in one systemnot Aidoc
- An NDIS provider that needs claim generation and service agreement tracking built into the same record as clinical notesnot Aidoc
- A multi-location allied health group in Australia that wants one diary across sites without paying per practitioner licencesnot Aidoc
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aidoc
- The clearances are for triage and notification in the CADt category, so the software may reorder a worklist but may not deliver a diagnosis or replace a read, and business cases built on reduced radiologist workload do not survive contact with the regulatory wording.
- Triage algorithms are tuned for sensitivity, so false positives are routine, and each one interrupts a radiologist. Sites that do not measure positive predictive value in their own case mix see clinician trust erode within months.
- Pricing is per algorithm and per study volume with no published rate card, so the cost of a multi algorithm deployment escalates sharply and cannot be benchmarked before a sales conversation.
- The clinical benefit accrues to stroke, trauma and cardiology service lines while the cost usually lands in the radiology or IT budget, which makes internal funding harder than the return on investment slides suggest.
- Performance depends on scanner protocols and reconstruction settings, so results validated at one site do not transfer, and each deployment needs local validation work that is rarely budgeted for.
Halaxy
- The software being free does not mean the platform is cheap: a clinic taking most payments by card pays roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus a fixed fee on every transaction, which on a high volume practice comfortably exceeds what a flat AUD 60 per practitioner subscription would have cost.
- Credits are prepaid and consumed by ordinary daily activity including SMS reminders and Medicare claims, so running out mid-week silently stops reminders going to patients, which shows up as no-shows rather than as an error message.
- Features that competitors treat as standard, including two-way calendar sync, API access and a dedicated SMS number, are locked behind the credit subscription, so the headline free tier is thinner than it first appears.
- Claiming, funding and payment integrations are deeply Australian, so practitioners in the UK, Canada or the United States get the diary and notes but very little of the automation that makes the product worth choosing.
- Because the vendor earns on payment volume, its interests and yours diverge on card processing: switching to a cheaper acquirer breaks the automatic reconciliation that is the main operational reason to stay on the platform.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aidoc
On request- Aidoc$undefined/year
- Annual subscription priced by algorithm and by study volume
- aiOS platform integration licensed separately from individual algorithms
- Multi algorithm bundles negotiated for enterprise deployments
Halaxy
Free- HalaxyFree
- Unlimited practitioners with no subscription fee
- Diary, patient records, clinical notes and invoicing
- Online booking page
- Premium subscription$25/month
- Priced at 25 credits per month, so roughly AUD 4 to 6 depending on credit rate
- Two-way calendar sync
- White-label branding
Which should you pick?
Choose Aidoc if
- You need triage and notification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intracranial haemorrhage.
Choose Halaxy if
- You need no licence fee.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want integrated claiming.
Questions people ask
- Is Aidoc or Halaxy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aidoc starts at On request and Halaxy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aidoc or Halaxy?
- Halaxy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Aidoc and Free for Halaxy.
- Does Aidoc or Halaxy run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Halaxy for free?
- Yes. Halaxy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Aidoc starts at On request.
- What is Aidoc best used for?
- Aidoc is most often used for a regional stroke centre that wants large vessel occlusion flagged and the neurointervention team notified before the radiologist dictates, a trauma centre wanting cervical spine fracture and intra abdominal free gas prioritised in an overnight queue read by one on call radiologist, an oncology imaging programme that wants incidental pulmonary embolism caught on staging cts ordered for a different question, a health system that has bought ai from several vendors and wants one pacs integration through aios rather than one integration per algorithm. Of those, a regional stroke centre that wants large vessel occlusion flagged and the neurointervention team notified before the radiologist dictates and a trauma centre wanting cervical spine fracture and intra abdominal free gas prioritised in an overnight queue read by one on call radiologist are not what Halaxy is typically brought in for.
- What can Aidoc do that Halaxy cannot?
- Aidoc covers Triage and notification, Intracranial haemorrhage, Pulmonary embolism, Large vessel occlusion. Halaxy covers No licence fee, Integrated claiming, Credit-based extras, Online booking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aidoc: Is Aidoc FDA cleared?
Yes, it holds multiple 510(k) clearances, but they are for computer aided triage and notification. It may prioritise a worklist and notify a team. It may not provide a diagnostic interpretation or replace a radiologist read.
Halaxy: Is Halaxy genuinely free or is there a hidden subscription?
The core practice management software has no subscription fee for any number of practitioners. Halaxy earns from card processing fees, prepaid credits for SMS and claiming, and an optional premium subscription priced at 25 credits a month.
Aidoc: Does it reduce radiologist workload?
No. Every study still needs a full read. The benefit is in the order studies are read and how quickly a receiving specialty is activated, not in reading fewer studies.
Halaxy: What does it actually cost a busy clinic?
Budget for card fees of roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus 75 cents to a dollar per transaction, plus credits at about AUD 0.15 to 0.22 each for every SMS, claim and telehealth session. A clinic with heavy card volume can pay more in total than a flat-rate competitor.
Aidoc: Can I run other vendors AI through it?
Yes, that is what the aiOS platform layer is for, and for health systems with several AI vendors it is often the main reason to buy Aidoc at all.
Halaxy: Can I use it outside Australia?
Yes for the diary, notes, invoicing and booking. No for Medicare, DVA, NDIS and Australian health fund claiming, which is where most of the value sits.
Aidoc: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per algorithm and by annual study volume, and enterprise bundles are negotiated case by case.
Halaxy: Does it handle NDIS?
Yes, including NDIS claim generation, service agreements and plan management alongside clinical records.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aidoc vs Therapixel
- Aidoc vs Lunit
- Aidoc vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Aidoc vs Annalise.ai
- Aidoc vs PathAI
- Aidoc vs Ambra Health
- Aidoc vs Paige
- Aidoc vs Figure 1
- Aidoc vs UpToDate
- Aidoc vs Visage Imaging
- Aidoc vs Meru Health
- Aidoc vs Sectra
- Aidoc vs Cerner PowerWorks
- Aidoc vs ChiroTouch
- Aidoc vs Doctolib
- Aidoc vs Doximity
- Aidoc vs eClinicalWorks
- Aidoc vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Aidoc vs Jane App
- Aidoc vs SimplePractice
- Aidoc vs Cliniko
- Aidoc vs Nookal
- Aidoc vs Zanda Health
- Aidoc vs Athenahealth
- Aidoc vs NextGen Healthcare
- Aidoc vs DrChrono
- Aidoc vs WebPT
- Aidoc vs Dentrix
- Aidoc vs Kareo Clinical
- Aidoc vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Aidoc vs Doctor on Demand
- Aidoc vs Doxy.me
- Aidoc vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Aidoc vs Ginger
- Aidoc vs Koa Health
- Aidoc vs OpenMRS
- Halaxy vs Therapixel
- Halaxy vs Lunit
- Halaxy vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Halaxy vs Annalise.ai
- Halaxy vs PathAI
- Halaxy vs Ambra Health
- Halaxy vs Paige
- Halaxy vs Figure 1
- Halaxy vs UpToDate
- Halaxy vs Visage Imaging
- Halaxy vs Meru Health
- Halaxy vs Sectra
- Halaxy vs Cerner PowerWorks
- Halaxy vs ChiroTouch
- Halaxy vs Doctolib
- Halaxy vs Doximity
- Halaxy vs eClinicalWorks
- Halaxy vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Halaxy vs Jane App
- Halaxy vs SimplePractice
- Halaxy vs Cliniko
- Halaxy vs Nookal
- Halaxy vs Zanda Health
- Halaxy vs Athenahealth
- Halaxy vs NextGen Healthcare
- Halaxy vs DrChrono
- Halaxy vs WebPT
- Halaxy vs Dentrix
- Halaxy vs Kareo Clinical
- Halaxy vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Halaxy vs Doctor on Demand
- Halaxy vs Doxy.me
- Halaxy vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Halaxy vs Ginger
- Halaxy vs Koa Health
- Halaxy vs OpenMRS
