Healthcare · head to head
Halaxy vs PathAI

Halaxy
Healthcare
Practice management for allied health that charges nothing for the software and earns on payments
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PathAI
Healthcare
Digital pathology image management with an FDA cleared platform for primary diagnosis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Halaxy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Halaxy the software being free does not mean the platform is cheap: a clinic taking most payments by card pays roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus a fixed fee on every transaction, which on a high volume practice comfortably exceeds what a flat AUD 60 per practitioner subscription would have cost.; PathAI aISight is labelled research use only and cannot be used for primary diagnosis; only AISight Dx carries the FDA clearance and CE-IVD mark, and laboratories regularly buy the wrong configuration and discover they cannot sign out on it.
- They diverge on capability: Halaxy covers No licence fee, PathAI covers AISight image management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Halaxy and PathAI actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Halaxy
- No licence fee
- Integrated claiming
- Credit-based extras
- Online booking
- Clinical notes and templates
- Card payments
- Multi-practitioner diary
- Patient portal
Only in PathAI
- AISight image management
- AISight Dx
- Scanner interoperability
- Case and worklist management
- AI algorithm deployment
- Biopharmaceutical research tooling
- LIS integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Halaxy
- A solo psychologist starting out who wants Medicare and private health claiming without committing to a monthly subscription before there is any incomenot PathAI
- A physiotherapy clinic that wants patient reminders, online booking and card payments reconciled against invoices in one systemnot PathAI
- An NDIS provider that needs claim generation and service agreement tracking built into the same record as clinical notesnot PathAI
- A multi-location allied health group in Australia that wants one diary across sites without paying per practitioner licencesnot PathAI
PathAI
- An academic medical centre going digital for primary diagnosis that needs the FDA cleared AISight Dx configuration rather than the research labelled versionnot Halaxy
- A reference laboratory consolidating subspecialty sign out across sites so a specialist pathologist can read cases from any locationnot Halaxy
- A pharmaceutical company needing consistent quantitative scoring of trial biopsies across many sites and readersnot Halaxy
- A laboratory with a mixed scanner estate that needs one image management layer rather than each scanner vendor viewernot Halaxy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Halaxy
- The software being free does not mean the platform is cheap: a clinic taking most payments by card pays roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus a fixed fee on every transaction, which on a high volume practice comfortably exceeds what a flat AUD 60 per practitioner subscription would have cost.
- Credits are prepaid and consumed by ordinary daily activity including SMS reminders and Medicare claims, so running out mid-week silently stops reminders going to patients, which shows up as no-shows rather than as an error message.
- Features that competitors treat as standard, including two-way calendar sync, API access and a dedicated SMS number, are locked behind the credit subscription, so the headline free tier is thinner than it first appears.
- Claiming, funding and payment integrations are deeply Australian, so practitioners in the UK, Canada or the United States get the diary and notes but very little of the automation that makes the product worth choosing.
- Because the vendor earns on payment volume, its interests and yours diverge on card processing: switching to a cheaper acquirer breaks the automatic reconciliation that is the main operational reason to stay on the platform.
PathAI
- AISight is labelled research use only and cannot be used for primary diagnosis; only AISight Dx carries the FDA clearance and CE-IVD mark, and laboratories regularly buy the wrong configuration and discover they cannot sign out on it.
- The software licence is usually the smallest line in a digital pathology project, behind scanners, storage and network capacity, so a business case built around the software cost understates the real investment by a wide margin.
- Whole slide images are very large, so a laboratory that does not model storage growth and retention policy from the start faces storage costs that grow faster than case volume and dominate the renewal.
- Clinical validation is required per subspecialty rather than once for the platform, which means dermatopathology, gastrointestinal and breast each need their own concordance study and pathologist time before go live.
- PathAI competes against pathology incumbents that also sell the scanners, and a laboratory buying an independent image management layer takes on the integration risk between scanner vendor and software vendor itself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Halaxy
Free- HalaxyFree
- Unlimited practitioners with no subscription fee
- Diary, patient records, clinical notes and invoicing
- Online booking page
- Premium subscription$25/month
- Priced at 25 credits per month, so roughly AUD 4 to 6 depending on credit rate
- Two-way calendar sync
- White-label branding
PathAI
On request- AISight$undefined/year
- Priced by annual slide or case volume and by pathologist seats
- AISight Dx, the clinically cleared configuration, quoted separately from research use AISight
- Image storage priced by capacity and retention policy
Which should you pick?
Choose Halaxy if
- You need no licence fee.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want integrated claiming.
Questions people ask
- Is Halaxy or PathAI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Halaxy starts at Free and PathAI at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Halaxy or PathAI?
- Halaxy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Halaxy and On request for PathAI.
- Does Halaxy or PathAI run on more platforms?
- Halaxy runs on Web, iOS, Android. PathAI runs on Web.
- Can I use Halaxy for free?
- Yes. Halaxy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PathAI starts at On request.
- What is Halaxy best used for?
- Halaxy is most often used for a solo psychologist starting out who wants medicare and private health claiming without committing to a monthly subscription before there is any income, a physiotherapy clinic that wants patient reminders, online booking and card payments reconciled against invoices in one system, an ndis provider that needs claim generation and service agreement tracking built into the same record as clinical notes, a multi-location allied health group in australia that wants one diary across sites without paying per practitioner licences. Of those, a solo psychologist starting out who wants medicare and private health claiming without committing to a monthly subscription before there is any income and a physiotherapy clinic that wants patient reminders, online booking and card payments reconciled against invoices in one system are not what PathAI is typically brought in for.
- What can Halaxy do that PathAI cannot?
- Halaxy covers No licence fee, Integrated claiming, Credit-based extras, Online booking. PathAI covers AISight image management, AISight Dx, Scanner interoperability, Case and worklist management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Halaxy: Is Halaxy genuinely free or is there a hidden subscription?
The core practice management software has no subscription fee for any number of practitioners. Halaxy earns from card processing fees, prepaid credits for SMS and claiming, and an optional premium subscription priced at 25 credits a month.
PathAI: What is the difference between AISight and AISight Dx?
AISight is for research use only and not for clinical diagnostic use. AISight Dx received FDA 510(k) clearance in June 2025 for primary diagnosis and is CE-IVD marked in the EEA, UK and Switzerland. Only the Dx configuration can be used to sign out cases.
Halaxy: What does it actually cost a busy clinic?
Budget for card fees of roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus 75 cents to a dollar per transaction, plus credits at about AUD 0.15 to 0.22 each for every SMS, claim and telehealth session. A clinic with heavy card volume can pay more in total than a flat-rate competitor.
PathAI: Can we use our existing scanners?
Yes. AISight is designed to ingest images from multiple whole slide scanner vendors, which is one of the main reasons laboratories choose an independent image management layer.
Halaxy: Can I use it outside Australia?
Yes for the diary, notes, invoicing and booking. No for Medicare, DVA, NDIS and Australian health fund claiming, which is where most of the value sits.
PathAI: Do the AI algorithms carry the same clearance as the platform?
No. The platform clearance covers image management for primary diagnosis. Individual algorithms have their own labelling, and many are research use only. Check each one separately.
Halaxy: Does it handle NDIS?
Yes, including NDIS claim generation, service agreements and plan management alongside clinical records.
PathAI: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by slide or case volume, pathologist seats and storage, with the clinically cleared configuration priced separately.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Halaxy vs Jane App
- Halaxy vs SimplePractice
- Halaxy vs Cliniko
- Halaxy vs Nookal
- Halaxy vs Zanda Health
- Halaxy vs Athenahealth
- Halaxy vs NextGen Healthcare
- Halaxy vs DrChrono
- Halaxy vs WebPT
- Halaxy vs Dentrix
- Halaxy vs Kareo Clinical
- Halaxy vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Halaxy vs Doctor on Demand
- Halaxy vs Doxy.me
- Halaxy vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Halaxy vs Ginger
- Halaxy vs Koa Health
- Halaxy vs OpenMRS
- Halaxy vs Techcyte
- Halaxy vs Ambra Health
- Halaxy vs Paige
- Halaxy vs Sysmex
- Halaxy vs Sectra
- Halaxy vs Lunit
- Halaxy vs Aidoc
- Halaxy vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Halaxy vs Therapixel
- Halaxy vs Gleamer
- Halaxy vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Halaxy vs Annalise.ai
- Halaxy vs Quantum Health
- Halaxy vs TherapyNotes
- Halaxy vs Zocdoc
- Halaxy vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- PathAI vs Jane App
- PathAI vs SimplePractice
- PathAI vs Cliniko
- PathAI vs Nookal
- PathAI vs Zanda Health
- PathAI vs Athenahealth
- PathAI vs NextGen Healthcare
- PathAI vs DrChrono
- PathAI vs WebPT
- PathAI vs Dentrix
- PathAI vs Kareo Clinical
- PathAI vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- PathAI vs Doctor on Demand
- PathAI vs Doxy.me
- PathAI vs Fujifilm Synapse
- PathAI vs Ginger
- PathAI vs Koa Health
- PathAI vs OpenMRS
- PathAI vs Techcyte
- PathAI vs Ambra Health
- PathAI vs Paige
- PathAI vs Sysmex
- PathAI vs Sectra
- PathAI vs Lunit
- PathAI vs Aidoc
- PathAI vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- PathAI vs Therapixel
- PathAI vs Gleamer
- PathAI vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- PathAI vs Annalise.ai
- PathAI vs Quantum Health
- PathAI vs TherapyNotes
- PathAI vs Zocdoc
- PathAI vs Allscripts Professional EHR
