Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs Pix4D

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Pix4D has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; Pix4D split into separate products by job, so PIX4Dreact at $55 a month, PIX4Dfields at $111, PIX4Dmatic at $125 and PIX4Dmapper at $333 are different purchases rather than tiers
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Pix4D covers Photogrammetry.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and Pix4D actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | Pix4D |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web |
| Category | Maps | Aviation |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in Pix4D
- Photogrammetry
- 3D modeling
- Point clouds
- Orthomosaics
- DSM/DTM generation
- CAD software
- GIS platforms
- BIM tools
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot Pix4D
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot Pix4D
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot Pix4D
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot Pix4D
Pix4D
- Photogrammetry from drone imagery into orthomosaics and point cloudsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Survey-grade 2D maps and 3D models with PIX4Dmappernot Agisoft Metashape
- Rapid 2D mapping for emergency response with PIX4Dreactnot Agisoft Metashape
- Multispectral crop analysis with PIX4Dfieldsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Large-scale processing with LiDAR integration through PIX4Dmaticnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
Pix4D
- Split into separate products by job, so PIX4Dreact at $55 a month, PIX4Dfields at $111, PIX4Dmatic at $125 and PIX4Dmapper at $333 are different purchases rather than tiers
- Subscription only, with monthly, yearly or three year cycles and no perpetual licence
- No refunds, and cancellation only takes effect at renewal
- Cloud processing is an add-on to the desktop subscriptions
- Hardware scanning kit prices are quoted on request
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
Pix4D
Free- PIX4Dreact$55/month
- Accurate 2D maps from aerial imagery
- Processing in minutes
- Monthly, yearly, or 3-year subscription available
- PIX4Dfields$111/month
- Precision agriculture mapping
- Crop analysis and digital farming
- Monthly, yearly, or 3-year subscription available
- PIX4Dmatic$125/month
- Photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR capabilities
- Local machine processing with full control
- Monthly, yearly, or 3-year subscription available
- PIX4Dmapper$333/month
- Professional photogrammetry software
- Drone mapping capabilities
- Monthly, yearly, or 3-year subscription available
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose Pix4D if
- You need photogrammetry.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web.
- You also want 3d modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or Pix4D better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Pix4D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or Pix4D?
- Pix4D has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for Pix4D.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or Pix4D run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Pix4D runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web.
- Can I use Pix4D for free?
- Yes. Pix4D has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what Pix4D is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that Pix4D cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. Pix4D covers Photogrammetry, 3D modeling, Point clouds, Orthomosaics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
Pix4D: What is the lowest-cost PIX4D subscription?
PIX4Dreact starts at $55/month and produces accurate 2D maps from aerial imagery processed in minutes. Subscriptions are available on monthly, yearly, or 3-year billing cycles.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
Pix4D: Does PIX4D offer a free trial?
Yes, PIX4D provides a 15-day free trial with no credit card required to test the software before committing to a subscription.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
Pix4D: What payment methods does PIX4D accept?
PIX4D accepts credit cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Link globally. Regional options include bank transfers, SEPA Direct Debit for Europe, ACH transfers for the US, and country-specific payment methods.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs ForeFlight
- Agisoft Metashape vs Garmin Pilot
- Agisoft Metashape vs SkyDemon
- Agisoft Metashape vs AMOS
- Agisoft Metashape vs AviaSIM Pro
- Agisoft Metashape vs Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024
- Agisoft Metashape vs X-Plane 12
- Agisoft Metashape vs DJI FlightHub 2
- Agisoft Metashape vs Honeywell Aerospace Systems
- Agisoft Metashape vs ARINC Flight Operations Services
- Agisoft Metashape vs Sabre AirCentre
- Agisoft Metashape vs Amadeus Altea
- Agisoft Metashape vs NavLog
- Agisoft Metashape vs PFPX Flight Planning
- Agisoft Metashape vs Prepar3D Professional
- Agisoft Metashape vs Ramco Aviation Suite
- Agisoft Metashape vs Rocket Lab Mission Software
- Agisoft Metashape vs Safelog Pilot Logbook
- Pix4D vs QGIS
- Pix4D vs Correlator3D
- Pix4D vs Global Mapper
- Pix4D vs Cesium ion
- Pix4D vs Potree
- Pix4D vs Leica Infinity
- Pix4D vs Emlid Studio
- Pix4D vs onX Maps
- Pix4D vs SW Maps
- Pix4D vs Fused
- Pix4D vs Lonboard
- Pix4D vs Trailforks
- Pix4D vs Atlas.co
- Pix4D vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Pix4D vs Felt
- Pix4D vs Geographic Calculator
- Pix4D vs ForeFlight
- Pix4D vs Garmin Pilot
- Pix4D vs SkyDemon
- Pix4D vs AMOS
- Pix4D vs AviaSIM Pro
- Pix4D vs Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024
- Pix4D vs X-Plane 12
- Pix4D vs DJI FlightHub 2
- Pix4D vs Honeywell Aerospace Systems
- Pix4D vs ARINC Flight Operations Services
- Pix4D vs Sabre AirCentre
- Pix4D vs Amadeus Altea
- Pix4D vs NavLog
- Pix4D vs PFPX Flight Planning
- Pix4D vs Prepar3D Professional
- Pix4D vs Ramco Aviation Suite
- Pix4D vs Rocket Lab Mission Software
- Pix4D vs Safelog Pilot Logbook

