Accounting · head to head
Adyen vs IBM QRadar

Adyen
Accounting
The payments platform built for growth
- From
- $0.13/per-transaction
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Adyen there is a minimum monthly invoice, set by industry and business model and only disclosed through the sales team, so small volumes are not economic; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Adyen covers Payment processing, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Adyen and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Adyen | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0.13/per-transaction | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Pos | Web, Api |
| Category | Accounting | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2006 | 1911 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Adyen
- Payment processing
- Risk management
- Unified commerce
- Issuing
- Platform payments
- SAP
- Salesforce
- Oracle
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Adyen
- Card acquiring with interchange plus pricing for larger merchantsnot IBM QRadar
- Accepting local payment methods across multiple countriesnot IBM QRadar
- Settling in several currencies through linked bank accountsnot IBM QRadar
- Unified online and in-person paymentsnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Adyen
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Adyen
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Adyen
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Adyen
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Adyen
- There is a minimum monthly invoice, set by industry and business model and only disclosed through the sales team, so small volumes are not economic
- Published fees are indicative rather than a rate card, with real pricing negotiated
- Interchange++ means the card cost varies per transaction rather than being a single predictable percentage
- Alternative payment methods carry their own rates on top, such as 3.3 percent plus $0.10 for American Express in North America
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Adyen
$0.13/per-transaction- Transaction-Based Pricing$undefined/mo
- Fixed $0.13 USD per transaction
- Variable fee determined by payment method
- No setup fees
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Adyen if
- You need payment processing.
- You work on Web, Api, Pos.
- You also want risk management.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Adyen or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Adyen starts at $0.13/per-transaction and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Adyen or IBM QRadar?
- Adyen starts at $0.13/per-transaction and IBM QRadar at On request.
- Does Adyen or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Adyen runs on Web, Api, Pos. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- What is Adyen best used for?
- Adyen is most often used for card acquiring with interchange plus pricing for larger merchants, accepting local payment methods across multiple countries, settling in several currencies through linked bank accounts, unified online and in-person payments. Of those, card acquiring with interchange plus pricing for larger merchants and accepting local payment methods across multiple countries are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Adyen do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Adyen covers Payment processing, Risk management, Unified commerce, Issuing. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Adyen: How much does Adyen charge per transaction?
Adyen charges a fixed $0.13 USD per transaction plus a variable fee based on the payment method used. Credit cards typically cost $0.13 + 0.60% + interchange, while digital wallets and BNPL options cost between $0.13 + 0.99% to $0.13 + 4.99%+, depending on the specific method and region.
SourceIBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Adyen: Does Adyen have monthly subscription or setup fees?
No, Adyen has no setup fees or monthly recurring charges. You pay only for each transaction processed. The transaction fee structure remains the same regardless of transaction volume or business size.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Adyen: What's Adyen's Interchange++ pricing option?
Adyen offers an Interchange++ transparent pricing model that passes interchange and scheme fees directly to merchants instead of bundling them into a percentage rate. This allows visibility into exact costs for each payment method.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Adyen: Can I process payments in multiple currencies with Adyen?
Yes, Adyen supports 100+ payment methods across multiple currencies. You can link multiple bank accounts in different currencies to avoid currency conversion fees on international transactions.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Adyen vs Melio
- Adyen vs Ramp
- Adyen vs Airbase
- Adyen vs QuickBooks
- Adyen vs Dodo Payments
- Adyen vs Paddle
- Adyen vs Polar
- Adyen vs Invoice2go
- Adyen vs Zuora
- Adyen vs Medius
- Adyen vs Veem
- Adyen vs Wise Business
- Adyen vs Lexware
- Adyen vs Maxio
- Adyen vs Paychex
- Adyen vs Payoneer
- Adyen vs Rydoo
- Adyen vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Adyen vs 1Password
- Adyen vs Norton 360
- Adyen vs LastPass
- Adyen vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Adyen vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Adyen vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Adyen vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Adyen vs Recorded Future
- Adyen vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Adyen vs Proofpoint
- Adyen vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Adyen vs Arnica
- Adyen vs Authelia
- Adyen vs Authy
- Adyen vs Baffle
- Adyen vs Beyond Identity
- Adyen vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Melio
- IBM QRadar vs Ramp
- IBM QRadar vs Airbase
- IBM QRadar vs QuickBooks
- IBM QRadar vs Dodo Payments
- IBM QRadar vs Paddle
- IBM QRadar vs Polar
- IBM QRadar vs Invoice2go
- IBM QRadar vs Zuora
- IBM QRadar vs Medius
- IBM QRadar vs Veem
- IBM QRadar vs Wise Business
- IBM QRadar vs Lexware
- IBM QRadar vs Maxio
- IBM QRadar vs Paychex
- IBM QRadar vs Payoneer
- IBM QRadar vs Rydoo
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
