Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Refact

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Refact has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Refact actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
Both cover
- On-premise deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Refact
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Refact
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Refact
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Acunetix
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Acunetix
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Acunetix
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Refact?
- Refact has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for Refact.
- Does Acunetix or Refact run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Refact for free?
- Yes. Refact has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Refact cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration. Both handle On-premise deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs GitHub Copilot
- Acunetix vs Swagger UI
- Acunetix vs Sweep
- Acunetix vs Coder
- Acunetix vs Deep Code
- Acunetix vs Pieces for Developers
- Acunetix vs CodeSandbox
- Acunetix vs GNU Emacs
- Acunetix vs Moonrepo
- Acunetix vs Pants Build
- Acunetix vs Atlantis
- Acunetix vs Backstage
- Acunetix vs JetBrains Rider
- Acunetix vs Spacelift
- Acunetix vs Argo CD
- Acunetix vs Blacksmith
- Refact vs Norton 360
- Refact vs 1Password
- Refact vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Refact vs LastPass
- Refact vs Burp Suite
- Refact vs Veracode
- Refact vs Nessus
- Refact vs OWASP ZAP
- Refact vs Arnica
- Refact vs Doppler
- Refact vs Aikido
- Refact vs NordPass
- Refact vs One Identity
- Refact vs Ory Kratos
- Refact vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Refact vs Tenable Nessus
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Deep Code
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs JetBrains Rider
- Refact vs Spacelift
- Refact vs Argo CD
- Refact vs Blacksmith
