Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Refact

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Refact actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Refact
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Refact
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Refact
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Refact
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Arnica
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Arnica
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Arnica
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Refact?
- Arnica starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does Arnica or Refact run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Refact cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceArnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceArnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs GitHub Copilot
- Arnica vs Swagger UI
- Arnica vs Sweep
- Arnica vs Coder
- Arnica vs Deep Code
- Arnica vs Pieces for Developers
- Arnica vs CodeSandbox
- Arnica vs GNU Emacs
- Arnica vs Moonrepo
- Arnica vs Pants Build
- Arnica vs Atlantis
- Arnica vs Backstage
- Arnica vs JetBrains Rider
- Arnica vs Spacelift
- Arnica vs Argo CD
- Arnica vs Blacksmith
- Refact vs Semgrep
- Refact vs Snyk
- Refact vs Chainguard
- Refact vs Tenable
- Refact vs Doppler
- Refact vs Aikido
- Refact vs Endor Labs
- Refact vs Trivy
- Refact vs Socket
- Refact vs Infisical
- Refact vs Bitwarden
- Refact vs RoboForm
- Refact vs Sardine
- Refact vs Semperis
- Refact vs SentinelOne
- Refact vs Shufti Pro
- Refact vs Nessus
- Refact vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Deep Code
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs JetBrains Rider
- Refact vs Spacelift
- Refact vs Argo CD
- Refact vs Blacksmith
