Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Keycloak

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Keycloak has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Acunetix does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Keycloak
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Keycloak
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Keycloak
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Acunetix
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Acunetix
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Acunetix
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Acunetix
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Keycloak?
- Keycloak has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for Keycloak.
- Does Acunetix or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Yes. Keycloak has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Keycloak cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Penpot
- Acunetix vs Soketi
- Acunetix vs Ansible
- Acunetix vs Atlantis
- Acunetix vs Vite
- Acunetix vs Depot
- Acunetix vs Pants Build
- Acunetix vs Buildkite
- Acunetix vs Coder
- Acunetix vs Jitsu
- Acunetix vs Bitbucket
- Acunetix vs Sweep
- Acunetix vs Azure DevOps
- Acunetix vs Backstage
- Acunetix vs Claude Code
- Acunetix vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Acunetix vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Burp Suite
- Keycloak vs Veracode
- Keycloak vs Nessus
- Keycloak vs OWASP ZAP
- Keycloak vs Arnica
- Keycloak vs Doppler
- Keycloak vs Aikido
- Keycloak vs NordPass
- Keycloak vs One Identity
- Keycloak vs Ory Kratos
- Keycloak vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Keycloak vs Tenable Nessus
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
