Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs GitHub Desktop

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

GitHub Desktop
Developer Tools
A free, open source Git client from GitHub for Windows and macOS that covers common workflows rather than all of Git.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Acunetix is an automated web vulnerability scanner.
- Both are free.
- Only Acunetix lists DAST scanning; only GitHub Desktop lists line-level staging.
- Where Acunetix falls short: pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and GitHub Desktop actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acunetix | GitHub Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Web, API | Windows, macOS |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2005 | 2008 |
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in GitHub Desktop
- Line-level staging
- Branch and merge UI
- Pull request integration
- Enterprise authentication
- Squash and reorder
- Drag cherry-pick
- Co-author attribution
- Editor and shell handoff
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot GitHub Desktop
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot GitHub Desktop
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not GitHub Desktop
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop
- Onboarding designers or technical writers who need to commit to a docs or assets repository without learning the command linenot Acunetix
- A new engineer's first weeks, where seeing the diff and the branch state visually prevents the common early mistakesnot Acunetix
- Reviewing a colleague's pull request branch locally with a readable diff before approving itnot Acunetix
- Small teams standardised entirely on GitHub who want SSO-backed authentication to work without managing personal access tokens by handnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
GitHub Desktop
- There is no official Linux build; the application ships for Windows and macOS only, and the community fork at shiftkey/desktop that packages it for Linux is maintained separately and lags official releases, so a mixed-OS team cannot standardise on one client
- Submodules are effectively unsupported: the app shows a submodule change as an opaque single line and gives you no way to initialise, update or navigate into it, so any repository using them needs the terminal anyway
- History rewriting is limited to squashing and reordering local commits by drag and drop; interactive rebase, fixup chains, editing an old commit's contents and bisect are all absent, which is exactly the set of operations a beginner needs help with most
- Pull request features only exist for GitHub remotes, so a team on GitLab or Bitbucket gets a plain Git client with an empty pull request pane and no review or checks view at all
- Commit signing with a key that requires a passphrase generally fails, because the app cannot surface the pinentry prompt, and the resulting error message does not say that is the cause
- GitHub staffs it lightly compared with its web and CI products, so long-standing feature requests and bugs sit open for years; if you file an issue you should plan around it rather than expect a fix
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
GitHub Desktop
Free- FreeFree
- Git repository management
- GitHub integration
- Visual diff tools
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, API.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose GitHub Desktop if
- You need line-level staging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS.
- You also want branch and merge ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or GitHub Desktop better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and GitHub Desktop at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or GitHub Desktop?
- GitHub Desktop has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for GitHub Desktop.
- Does Acunetix or GitHub Desktop run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Windows, macOS, Web, API. GitHub Desktop runs on Windows, macOS.
- Can I use GitHub Desktop for free?
- Yes. GitHub Desktop has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what GitHub Desktop is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that GitHub Desktop cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. GitHub Desktop covers Line-level staging, Branch and merge UI, Pull request integration, Enterprise authentication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceGitHub Desktop: Is there a Linux version?
Not an official one. GitHub ships Windows and macOS builds only. A community fork, shiftkey/desktop, produces Linux packages, but it is maintained by volunteers and trails the official releases.
GitHub Desktop: Does it work with GitLab or Bitbucket?
For plain Git operations, yes: you can clone, commit, push and pull against any remote. The pull request, review and checks features only work against GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise.
GitHub Desktop: What does it cost?
Nothing. It is free and the source is published under the MIT licence, and it is separate from any GitHub plan you may or may not pay for.
GitHub Desktop: Will it handle submodules?
No. Submodule changes appear as an unreadable single-line diff and there are no controls for initialising or updating them. Repositories that use submodules need the command line.
GitHub Desktop: Do I still need to learn Git?
For everyday work, no. For recovery, yes. Anything beyond the curated set of operations, including interactive rebase and reflog recovery, happens in the terminal, so a team using it should have at least one person who knows Git properly.
GitHub Desktop: Does it work with GitHub Enterprise Server?
Yes. It signs in to GitHub Enterprise Server and GitHub Enterprise Cloud as well as GitHub.com, and it honours organisations that enforce SAML single sign-on.
Related pages
More on GitHub Desktop
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Dashlane
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Passbolt
- Acunetix vs Ping Identity
- Acunetix vs Proofpoint
- Acunetix vs Qualys VMDR
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs GitLab
- Acunetix vs Postman
- Acunetix vs Atlantis
- Acunetix vs Depot
- Acunetix vs JetBrains Rider
- Acunetix vs Claude Code
- Acunetix vs RAD Studio
- Acunetix vs Docker
- Acunetix vs Earthly
- Acunetix vs Jenkins
- Acunetix vs Deep Code
- Acunetix vs Ansible
- Acunetix vs Buildkite
- Acunetix vs Helix
- Acunetix vs Neovim
- Acunetix vs pnpm
- Acunetix vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Acunetix vs Tilt
- GitHub Desktop vs Burp Suite
- GitHub Desktop vs Veracode
- GitHub Desktop vs Nessus
- GitHub Desktop vs OWASP ZAP
- GitHub Desktop vs Arnica
- GitHub Desktop vs Dashlane
- GitHub Desktop vs Doppler
- GitHub Desktop vs Aikido
- GitHub Desktop vs LogRhythm SIEM
- GitHub Desktop vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- GitHub Desktop vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- GitHub Desktop vs One Identity
- GitHub Desktop vs Ory Kratos
- GitHub Desktop vs Passbolt
- GitHub Desktop vs Ping Identity
- GitHub Desktop vs Proofpoint
- GitHub Desktop vs Qualys VMDR
- GitHub Desktop vs Tenable Nessus
- GitHub Desktop vs GitLab
- GitHub Desktop vs Postman
- GitHub Desktop vs Atlantis
- GitHub Desktop vs Depot
- GitHub Desktop vs JetBrains Rider
- GitHub Desktop vs Claude Code
- GitHub Desktop vs RAD Studio
- GitHub Desktop vs Docker
- GitHub Desktop vs Earthly
- GitHub Desktop vs Jenkins
- GitHub Desktop vs Deep Code
- GitHub Desktop vs Ansible
- GitHub Desktop vs Buildkite
- GitHub Desktop vs Helix
- GitHub Desktop vs Neovim
- GitHub Desktop vs pnpm
- GitHub Desktop vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- GitHub Desktop vs Tilt
